Side-by-side Chinese-English


贺路翔1 陈灯红1 杨紫辉1 杨乃鑫1 孙豹1

(1.三峡大学土木与建筑学院, 湖北宜昌 443002)

【摘要】为了研究在地震作用下混凝土重力坝的整体抗震性能,以我国西南地区200 m级的光照混凝土重力坝为例,建立了整体大坝的坝体-库水-地基系统三维有限元模型,基于增量动力分析法对该模型进行了地震响应分析及地震易损性分析。根据整体大坝模型的增量动力分析计算结果,分别提取了坝顶和底孔的位移进行IDA曲线、分位曲线以及地震易损性曲线的绘制。结果表明地震波的PGA在0. 2 g以下时,坝体出现破坏的概率很低; PGA为0. 3 g以下时,可满足坝体基本功能保障;PGA在0. 6 g以下时,能满足坝体基本安全保证。

【关键词】 混凝土重力坝;三维模型;增量动力分析;地震易损性;


【基金资助】 国家自然科学基金项目(51309143); 湖北省自然科学基金项目(2018CFB652); 流域水循环模拟与调控国家重点实验室开放研究基金(IWHR-SKL-201716);

Study on anti-seismic performance of three-dimensional concrete gravity dam system based on IDA

HE Luxiang1 CHEN Denghong1 YANG Zihui1 YANG Naixin1 SUN Bao1

(1.College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, China 443002)

【Abstract】For the aim of studying the anti-seismic performance of concrete gravity dam under earthquake loads, the Guangzhao concrete gravity dam with 200 meters height in the Southwest China was taken as an example. The three-dimensional finite element model of the dam body–reservoir water–foundation system was established. Dynamic analysis and seismic vulnerability analysis were carried out based on the incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) method. According to the IDA results of the whole dam model, the displacements of the dam crest and the bottom hole were extracted. The IDA curves, the fractile curves, and the seismic vulnerability curves were obtained. It is concluded that when the PGA of the seismic wave was below 0.2 g, the probability of damage to the dam was very low; when the PGA was 0.3 g or less, the basic function guarantee of the dam can be satisfied; when the PGA was below 0.6 g, the basic safety requirement of the dam can be met.

【Keywords】 concrete gravity dam; three-dimensional model; Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA); seismic vulnerability;


【Funds】 National Natural Science Foundation of China (51309143); Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (2018CFB652); Open Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin (IWHR-SKL-201716);

Download this article

    [1] Vamvatisikos D. Incremental Dynamic Analysis [M]. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2015.

    [2] Vamvastsikos D. Seismic performance uncertainty estimation via IDA with progress accelerogram-wise Latin hypercube sampling [J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2014, 140 (8): 657–670.

    [3] Soysal B F, Binici B, Arici Y. Investigation of the relationship of seismic intensity measures and the accumulation of damage on concrete gravity dams using incremental dynamic analysis [J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2016, 45 (5): 719–737.

    [4] Alembagheri M, Ghaemian M. Quantification of seismic potential failure modes in concrete dams [J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2016, 45 (6): 979–997.

    [5] Pan J W, Xu Y J, Jin F. Seismic performance assessment of arch dams using incremental nonlinear dynamic analysis [J]. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 2015, 19 (3): 305–326.

    [6] Wang J T, Zhang M X, Jin A Y, et al. Seismic fragility of arch dams based on damage analysis [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2018, 109: 58–68.

    [7] LI J, CHEN J Y, XU Q, et al. Study on index of seismic performance evaluation of arch dam [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2015, 46 (1): 118–124 (in Chinese).

    [8] ZHANG H Y, ZHANG L J, LI L X, et al. Study on influences from characteristics of ground motion design response spectrum on incremental dynamic analysis of intake tower [J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2017, 48 (9): 84–88 (in Chinese).

    [9] CEN W J, ZHANG Z Q, ZHOU T, et al. Maximum seismic capacity of a high concrete-face rockfill dam on alluvium deposit [J]. Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources, 2016, 36 (2): 1–5, 58 (in Chinese).

    [10] LI Q. Study and Application of Incremental Dynamic Analysis Method [D]. Xi’an: Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, 2011 (in Chinese).

    [11] NB 35047–2015, Code for Seismic Design of Hydraulic Structures in Hydropower Projects [S]. Beijing: China Electric Power Press, 2015 (in Chinese).

    [12] Vamvatsikos D, Cornell C A. Incremental dynamic analysis [J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2002, 31 (3): 491–514.

    [13] Cornell C A. Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines [J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2002, 128 (4): 526–533.

    [14] ZHANG H, MENG Y C, TIAN L Y. Seismic vulnerability factors analysis of masonry structure based on IDA [J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2017, 37 (1): 49–53 (in Chinese).

    [15] YAO X W. Performance-based Seismic Fragility Analysis and Safety Assessment of High Arch Dams [D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2013 (in Chinese).

    [16] Hariri-Ardebili M A, Saouma V. Collapse fragility curves for concrete dams: Comprehensive study [J]. American Society of Civil Engineers, 2016, 142 (10): 426–438.

    [17] REN Qingwen, DU Chengbin, et al. Study and development on the seismic safety of the dam of Guangzhao hydropower station [R]. Nanjing: Hohai University, 2009 (in Chinese).

    [18] Lee J, Fenves G. L. A plastic-damage concrete model for earthquake analysis of dams [J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1998, 27: 937–956.

    [19] XU B, ZHANG X, PANG R, et al. Seismic performance analysis of high core-wall rockfill dams based on deformation and stability [J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2018, 37 (10): 31–38 (in Chinese).

    [20] LI J, CHEN J Y, LU G SH. Damage analysis of gravity dam suffered from earthquake landslide surge [J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2015, 24 (5): 19–26 (in Chinese).

This Article


CN: 23-1324/X

Vol 28, No. 04, Pages 159-168

August 2019


Article Outline


  • 1 Anti-seismic analysis method based on IDA
  • 2 Project profile and calculation analysis
  • 3 Study on overall limit anti-seismic performance
  • 4 Failure mode analysis of whole dam
  • 5 Conclusions
  • References