Evaluating the impact of the farmland consolidation and titling policy on agricultural scale management and development: evidence from quasi-natural experiments
【Abstract】This article uses Difference-in-Differences method to analyze the effect of farmland management scale and service scale management of land consolidation and titling by employing the quasi-natural experimental data of land consolidation and titling in Yangshan County, Guangdong Province. The study shows that land consolidation and titling policies have significantly increased the scale of agricultural land and the expansion of farmers’ agricultural land management. At the same time, the impact of the implementation of land consolidation and titling policies on the accessibility and utilization rate of farmers’ agricultural outsourcing service has shifted over time from a potential degree to a significantly positive effect.
【Keywords】 farmland consolidation and titling; agricultural scale management; quasi-natural experiment; Difference-in-Differences;
. ① Source: National Rural Operation and Management Statistics (2013) (全国农村经营管理统计资料(2013)) and National Rural Operation and Management Statistics (2016) (全国农村经营管理统计资料(2016)) of the Rural Economic System and Management Department, Ministry of Agriculture. [^Back]
. ① In 2013, when Yangshan became a pilot county for the farmland consolidation and titling policy, Libu was selected as one of the pilot towns. Then, the Town chose Shengping as a pilot village for the farmland titling. Therefore, Shengping was a pilot area for farmland consolidation and titling. [^Back]
. ① The shared area per household for farmland infrastructure construction was calculated after deducting the area increased due to land plot consolidation, field ridges removal, and so on. [^Back]
. ① Shengping was chosen for farmland consolidation and titling in January-March, because with the period as a local slack season and the farmers returning home during the Spring Festival, they could coordinate and promote farmland improvement and titling without delaying the production in the following spring. [^Back]
1. Chen, Q. 高级计量经济学及Stata应用(第二版). Beijing: Higher Education Press, (2014).
2. Chen, X. & Hu, X. Academic Research (学术研究), (9) (2018).
3. Cheng, L., Zhang, Y. & Liu, Z. Management World (管理世界), (1) (2016).
4. Fang, D. & Sun, M. East China Economic Management (华东经济管理), (2) (2016).
5. Gu, T., Ji, Y. & Zhong, F. Chinese Rural Economy (中国农村经济), (2) (2017).
6. He, X. Issues in Agricultural Economy (农业经济问题), (15) (2016).
7. He, X. 农村工作通讯, (15) (2016).
8. Huang, J. & Ji, X. Management World (管理世界), (9) (2012).
9. Hu, X., Zhu, W. & Luo, B. Tianjin Social Sciences (天津社会科学), (4) (2016).
10. Luo, B. South China Journal of Economics (南方经济), (5) (2014).
11. Luo, B. Chinese Rural Economy (中国农村经济), (11) (2017).
12. Luo, B. & Hu, X. Rural Economy (农村经济), (1) (2016).
13. Luo, M. & Liu, K. Guizhou Social Sciences (贵州社会科学), (6) (2017).
14. Qian, J., Chen, Z., Mateusz, F. et al. Journal of China Agricultural University (中国农业大学学报), (9) (2017).
15. Su, Z., Yang, Y., Gan, Y. et al., in Proceedings of the 11th China Soft Science Academic Annual Conference. 第十一届中国软科学学术年会论文集 (上). Beijing, (2015).
16. Sun, B., Liu, Q., Hu, S. et al. East China Economic Management (华东经济管理), (1) (2016).
17. Tian, W. Management and Administration on Rural Cooperative (农村经营管理), (7) (2015).
18. Tan, Y. & Zeng, H. Rural Economy (农村经济), (4) (2017).
19. Wang, Y. Management and Administration on Rural Cooperative (农村经营管理), (8) (2016).
20. Wang, Y., Pan, H. & Zhang, W. Farmers’ Daily (农民日报), 4 (2017-5-10).
21. Wang, Z., Shen, H. & Liao, X. Chinese Rural Economy (中国农村经济), (9) (2011).
22. Zheng, X., Wang, H. & Zhao, Y. Management World (管理世界), (8) (2011).
23. Zhou, L. & Chen, Y. Economic Research Journal (经济研究), (8) (2005).
24. Almond, D., H. Li, and S. Zhang, 2013, “Land Reform and Sex Selection in China”, NBER Working Paper 19153, http: www.nber.org/papers/w19153.
25. Alston, L. J., G. D. Libecap, and R. Schneider, 1996, “The Determinants and Impact of Property Rights: Land Titles on the Brazilian Frontier”, Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 12 (1): 25–61.
26. Coase, R. H., 1960, “The Problem of Social Cost”, Journal of Law & Economics, 3 (4): 1–44.
27. Conning, J. H., and J. A. Robinson, 2007, “Property Rights and the Political Organization of Agriculture”, Journal of Development Economics, 82 (2): 416–447.
28. Deininger, K., and G. Feder, 2009, “Land Registration, Governance, and Development: Evidence and Implications for Policy”, World Bank Research Observer, 24 (2): 233–266.
29. Deininger, K., S. Q. Jin, and H. K. Nagarajan, 2009, “Determinants and Consequences of Land Sales Market Participation: Panel Evidence from India”, World Development, 37 (2): 410–421.
30. Deininger, K., S. Jin, S. Liu, and F. Xia, 2015, “Impact of Property Rights Reform to Support China’s Rural-urban Integration: Household-level Evidence from the Chengdu National Experiment”, Policy Research Working Paper Series, The World Bank, http://hdl.handle.net/10986/22438.
31. De Soto H., 2000, The Mystery of Capital, New York: Basic Books.
32. Feder, G., and A. Nishio, 1998, “The Benefits of Land Registration and Titling: Economic and Social Perspectives”, Land Use Policy, 15 (1): 25–43.
33. Gandelman, N., and A. Rasteletti, 2016, “The Impact of Bank Credit on Employment Formality: Evidence from Uruguay”, Research Department Publications, 52 (7): 1–18.
34. Jacoby, H., and B. Minten, 2006, “Land Titles, Investment, and Agricultural Productivity in Madagascar: A Poverty and Social Impact Analysis”, World Bank Other Operational Studies, http://hdl.handle.net/10986/12661.
35. Kemper, N., L. V. Ha, and R. Klump, 2015, “Property Rights and Consumption Volatility: Evidence from a Land Reform in Vietnam”, World Development, 71:107–130.
36. Libecap, G. D., and D. Lueck, 2011, “The Demarcation of Land and the Role of Coordinating Property Institutions”, Journal of Political Economy, 119 (3): 426–467.
37. Place, F., and S. E. Migot-Adholla, 1998, “The Economic Effects of Land Registration on Smallholder Farms in Kenya: Evidence from Nyeri and Kakamega Districts”, Land Economics, 74 (3): 360–373.