Can agricultural growth improve environmental productivity? —an empirical test of conditional Environmental Kuznets Curve
(2.Soochow University Think Tank)
【Abstract】According to the characteristics of agricultural tri-dimensional and cross pollution and its negative impact on the degradation of China’s ecological environment, first of all, we used the GML method to measure China’s agricultural productivity with environmental factors, to explore the relationship between agricultural growth and agricultural environment from the perspective of productivity, and thus to expand the traditional Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC). Secondly, by using China’s provincial-level panel data and a variety of methods including the dynamic GMM, this paper identified the relationship between the two sides, and meanwhile used the threshold regression model to test the formation mechanism of conditional EKC. The study showed that there existed a stable U-shaped relation between agricultural growth and environmental productivity and that the agricultural EKC was generally supported in China. However, along with economic development, most areas of China were still in the down trend of environmental productivity. Moreover, the forming of the EKC should meet some conditions and had a certain threshold effect, which meant that the progress of agricultural technology played a key role in the formation of the U-shaped curve and the promotion of environmental productivity.
【Keywords】 agricultural growth; agricultural environmental productivity; technological progress; the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC);
(Translated by GUO Changlei)
. ① Data source: http://news.xinhuanet.com [^Back]
. ② Data source: http:jcs.mep.gov.cn [^Back]
. ③ Data source: http://www.stats.gov.cn [^Back]
. ① The density of fertilizer input equals the ratio of chemical fertilizer to the grain yield; the density of pesticides input equals the ratio of pesticides to food production; livestock and poultry excrement equals the ratio of excrement to the grain yield. [^Back]
. ① Total-factor energy efficiency refers to the ratio of energy input to its actual input for a certain output according to the optimal state of production practice under the premises that factors except input of energy are unchanged. [^Back]
. ① Specific expressions are shown in studies by Oh (2009). [^Back]
. ② Because China’s agricultural non-point source pollution mainly includes fertilizer, pesticides, and farm wastes and the utilization rate of fertilizer is only 10%, so 90% of pesticides flow into and polluted rivers via surface and soil infiltrations. [^Back]
. ③ Due to the lack of some data on the Tibet Autonomous Region and Hainan Province, these regions are not considered in this paper [^Back]
. ④ National Bureau of Statistics (eds.). China Statistical Yearbook (2000–2012, over the years) (中国统计年鉴, 2000–2012). Beijing: China Statistics Press. [^Back]
. ⑤ Department of Rural Surveys, National Bureau of Statistics of China (eds.). China Rural Statistical Yearbook (2000–2012, over the years) (中国农村统计年鉴,2000-2012). Beijing: China Statistics Press. [^Back]
. ⑥ National Bureau of Statistics (eds.). China Statistical Yearbook on Environment (2000–2012, over the years) (中国环境计年鉴, 2000-2012). Beijing: China Statistics Press. [^Back]
. ① See regression functions 3–7 in Table 2. [^Back]
. ① The SYS-GMM can use the variables that lag several terms as instrumental variables by adding zero. [^Back]
. ② The TPR was proposed by Hansen (1999). Its principle was to incorporate a certain threshold variable into the regression model, to construct a piecewise function, and to conduct a test on the threshold effect; the threshold value and its number were given by the system endogenously. By adopting the asymptotic distribution theory, this method set the confidence interval of parameters to be estimated and estimated and tested the significance of the threshold value with the bootstrap method. [^Back]
. ① Due to the limitation of space, this paper does not provide the detailed results of the threshold effect tests. If you are interested in them, you can contact the author. [^Back]
. ① In Table 3, after the variable of agricultural technological progress is added to Regression Model 3, the threshold value of per-capita agricultural added value drops from CNY 10875 to CNY 8807. [^Back]
1 Blundell, R. and Bond, S.: Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models, Journal of Econometrics, 87(1): 115–143, 1998.
2 Bond, S.: Dynamic Panel Data Models: A Guide to Micro Data Methods and Practice, CEMMAP Working Paper No. CWP09P02, 2002.
3 Boyce, J. K.: Inequality as a Cause of Environmental Degradation, Ecological Economics, 11(3): 169–178, 1994.
4 Cameron, A. Conlin and Pravin, K.: Micro Econometrics Using Stata, Stata Press, 2009.
5 Chambers, R. G.; Chung, Y. and Färe, R.: Benefit and Distance Functions, Journal of Economic Theory, 70(2): 407–419, 1996.
6 Chung, Y. H. and Fare, R. and Grosskoph, S.: Productivity and Undesirable Outputs: A Directional Distance Function Approach, Journal of Environmental Management, 51(3): 229–240, 1997.
7 Grossman, G. M. and Krueger, A. B.: Economic Growth and the Environment, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2): 353–377, 1995.
8 Hansen, B.: Threshold Effects in Non-dynamic Panels: Estimation, Testing and Inference, Journal of Econometrics, 93(2): 345–368, 1999.
9 Hu, J .L. and Wang, S. C.: Total-factor Energy Efficiency of Regions in China, Energy Policy, 34(17): 3206–3217, 2006.
10 Iwata, H.; Okada, K and Samreth, S.: Empirical Study on the Environmental Kuznets Curve for CO2 in France: The Role of Nuclear Energy, Energy Policy, 38(8): 4057–4063, 2010.
11 Kahn, M. E.: A Household Level Environmental Kuznets Curve, Economics Letters, 59(2): 269–273, 1998.
12 Kumar, S.: Environmentally Sensitive Productivity Growth: A Global Analysis Using Malmquist-Luenberger Index, Ecological Economics, 56(2): 280–293, 2006.
13 Luenberger, D. G.: New Optimality Principles for Economic Efficiency and Equilibrium, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 75(2): 221–264, 1992.
14 Oh, D. H.: A Global Malmquist-Luenberger Productivity Index, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 34(3): 183–197, 2010.
15 Williams, S. P. and Shumway, C. R.: Trade Liberalization and Agricultural Chemical Use: United States and Mexico, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 82(1): 183–199, 2000.
16 Windmeijer, F.: A Finite Sample Correction for the Variance of Linear Efficient Two-step GMM Estimators, Journal of Econometrics, 126(1): 25–52, 2005.
17 Lewandrowski, J.; Tobey, J. and Cook, Z.: The Interface between Agricultural Assistance and the Environment: Chemical Fertilizer Consumption and Area Expansion, Land Economics, 73(3): 404–427, 1997.
18 Cao, D. & Li, G. Soft Science (软科学), (7) (2011).
19 Du, J. & Liu, Y. World Economic Papers (世界经济文汇), (3) (2009).
20 Li, G., Fan, L. & Min, R. The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics (数量经济技术经济研究), (10) (2011).
21 Li, H., Ye, H. & Zhang, J. Chinese Journal of Population, Resources and Environment (中国人口•资源与环境), (2) (2006).
22 Li, W. Economic Research Journal (经济研究), (7) (2008).
23 Li, Z. Economic Perspectives (经济学动态), (11) (2008).
24 Liu, Y., Chen, S. & Zhang, Y. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin (中国农学通报), (16) (2009).
25 Shen, N., Zhou, J. & Wang, Q. Chinese Rural Economy (中国农村经济), (12) (2013).
26 Wang, B., Yang, H. & Zhu, N. South China Journal of Economics (南方经济), (10) (2011).
27 Zhang, H. & Hu, H. Chinese Rural Economy (中国农村经济), (16) (2009).