Social supervision, group identity and farmers’ behavior in disposing domestic waste: an analysis based on mediating and moderating effects of the face consciousness
(2.Hubei Rural Development Research Center)
【Abstract】Farmers’ behavior is the result of interaction between internal and external factors. By incorporating the face consciousness, group identity and social supervision into one analytical framework, this paper explores the influence of internal factors (face consciousness and group identity) and external one (social supervision) on farmers’ behavior in disposing domestic waste (disposing domestic waste in a centralized way or littering). Based on the analysis, it further examines the mechanism underlying the interaction between internal and external factors. Finally, it uses data on 1,883 rural households in Hubei Province to conduct an empirical test. The results show that firstly, supervision by village cadres and cleaners has a significantly positive effect on farmers’ behavior in disposing domestic waste (namely prompting them to dispose domestic waste in a centralized way). Secondly, the face consciousness also has a significantly positive effect on farmers’ such behavior, whereas group identity has no direct influence on the behavior. But the group identity indirectly influences the farmers’ behavior via the face consciousness. Thirdly, the face consciousness has a positive moderating effect on the relationship between the supervision by village cadres and cleaners and farmers’ behavior in disposing domestic waste. That is to say, for farmers who have a strong face consciousness, tightened supervision by village cadres and cleaners will facilitate farmers’ centralized disposal behavior to an even greater extent.
【Keywords】 social supervision; group identity; face consciousness; domestic waste disposal;
. ① Source: Calculated based on relevant data in China Statistical Yearbook 2017 (compiled by the National Bureau of Statistics and published by China Statistics Press in 2017). [^Back]
. ① The social facilitation theory was put forward by American scholar R. B. Zajonc in 1965. It can explain the phenomena of social facilitation and social interference. Social facilitation refers to the phenomenon that an individual’s performance will be improved due to the presence of others (real, imagined or implied presence of others) when he or she is performing an activity. Contrary to social facilitation is social interference (or social inhibition), which refers to a decline in an individual’s performance due to the presence of others. [^Back]
. ① http://hbt.hubei.gov.cn: 8080/pub/root8/auto588/201503/t20150306 _ 75707.html; http://www.hubei.gov.cn/2018/zdly/201809/t20180906_1338698.shtml. [^Back]
. ② Source: Hubei Statistical Yearbook 2017, compiled by Hubei Provincial Bureau of Statistics and Survey Office of National Bureau of Statistics in Hubei. Beijing: China Statistics Press (2017). [^Back]
. ① In this paper, centralized disposal of domestic waste by farmers refers to the behavior of dumping their domestic waste at designated sites for centralized treatment (such as public dumping sites, waste collection pools, waste bins and other facilities). [^Back]
1. Cui, Y. & Bluemling B. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment (干旱区资源与环境), (4) (2018).
2. Dong, L. & Guo, J. Social Sciences in China (中国社会科学), (8) (2017).
3. Fang, J. & Zhang, M. Acta Psychologica Sinica (心理学报), (10) (2012).
4. Gui, H. & Ouyang, J. Journal of Minzu University of China (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) (中央民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版)), (1) (2012).
5. Huang, Z. 谁是农业结构调整的主体？—农户行为及决策分析. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, (2005).
6. Lin, L., Liu Z. & Huang S. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment (生态与农村环境学报), (2) (2017).
7. Lin, Y. 制度, 技术与中国农业发展. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House, (1994).
8. Liu, Y. & Huang, J. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics (农业技术经济), (7) (2013).
9. Liu, Y. & Wang, F. Chinese Rural Economy (中国农村经济), (3) (2012).
10. Liu, C. & Wang, J. Industrial Economic Review (产经评论), (2) (2014).
11. Luo, B. China Rural Survey (中国农村观察), (2) (2007).
12. Meng, H. & Zhu, P. Journal of Yunnan Finance and Trade Institute (云南财经大学学报), (6) (2017).
13. Shi, Z., Wu, L. & Kuang, Z. Journal of Marketing Science (营销科学学报), (2) (2014).
14. Shi, J., Hao, Z. & Cui, L. Psychological Science (心理科学), (2) (2012).
15. Wang, A., Gao, Q. & Shi, Y. Issues in Agricultural Economy (农业经济问题), (4) (2016).
16. Wen, Z., Hou, J. & Zhang, L. Acta Psychologica Sinica (心理学报), (2) (2005).
17. Wen, Z. & Ye, B. Advances in Psychological Science (心理科学进展), (5) (2014).
18. Xu, Z., Yao, S. & Miao, S. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment (干旱区资源与环境), (2) (2016).
19. Yang, J. Jiangxi Social Sciences (江西社会科学), (6) (2013).
20. Yang, Z. Chinese Rural Economy (中国农村经济), (4) (2018).
21. Yang, J. & Chen, Z. Chinese Rural Economy (中国农村经济), (5) (2016).
22. Zhang, M. Studies in Science of Science (科学学研究), (3) (2013).
23. Zhang, X. Journal of Marketing Science (营销科学学报), (1) (2012).
24. Zhao, Z. Collected Essays on Finance and Economics (财经论丛), (2) (2017).
25. Zhi, J. & Chen, Q. World Economic Papers (世界经济文汇), (1) (2018).
26. Chen, X. P., S. A. Wasti, and H. C. Triandis, 2007, “When Does Group Norm or Group Identity Predict Cooperation in a Public Goods Dilemma? The Moderating Effects of Idiocentrism and Allocentrism”, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 31(2): 259–276.
27. Kathuria, V., 2007, “Informal Regulation of Pollution in a Developing Country: Evidence from India”, Ecological Economics, 63(2): 425–436．
28. Klandermans, B., 2002, “How Group Identification Helps to Overcome the Dilemma of Collective Action”, American Behavioral Scientist, 45(5): 887–900.
29. Mael, F. A, and B. E. Ashforth, 1992, “Alumni and Their Alma Mater: A Partial Test of the Reformulated Model of Organizational Identification”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2): 103–123.
30. Tajfel, H., 1986, “The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior”, Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 13(3): 7–24.
31. Zajonc, R. B., 1965, “Social Facilitation”, Science, 149(3681): 269–274.