The measurement method of middle-income group and its application: empirical evidence from CHIP

WENG Jie1 WANG Jing1

(1.School of Management, Zhejiang University of Technology)

【Abstract】Scientific measurement of the middle-income group is an important prerequisite for determining quantitative policy objectives and monitoring the group’s scale effectively. The ideal measurement needs to meet at least three requirements, which relate to economic rationality, regional differences and automatic adjustment. The evaluation of the existing measurement methods shows that the hybrid standard method has more advantages than the relative standard method and the absolute standard method. According to the principle of the hybrid standard method, a new measurement method of the middle-income group is developed. The middle-income group is defined as the households with a per capita annual income between three times per capita food consumption expenditure of urban households in the region and three times the median of per capita annual income of the household. The empirical results from CHIP data reveal that China has formed a large-scale middle-income group, and its distribution has been of obvious regional differences and urban-rural differences. The comparative analysis of the measurement results suggests that the measurement results obtained by the new method are more reasonable.

【Keywords】 middle-income group; measurement method; median income; structure of income distribution;

【DOI】

【Funds】 The National Social Science Fund of China (18BJY047)

Download this article

    References

    1. Li, C. Hebei Academic Journal (河北学刊), (2) (2017).

    2. Li, C. Journal of Beijing University of Technology (Social Sciences Edition) (北京工业大学学报(社会科学版)), (2) (2018).

    3. Li, P. Studies in Labor Economics (劳动经济研究), (1) (2017).

    4. Li, P. & Zhu, D. Social Sciences in China (中国社会科学), (1) (2015).

    5. Li, Q. & Xu, L. Social Sciences of Beijing (北京社会科学), (7) (2017).

    6. Li, S. Social Governance Review (社会治理), (6) (2017).

    7. Long, Y. Statistical Research (统计研究), (2) (2015).

    8. Wang, H. Reform (改革), (5) (2013).

    9. Wu, P. & Chang, Y. Social Science Research (社会科学研究), (2) (2018).

    10. Zhu, B. & Fan, X. Jianghai Academic Journal (江海学刊), (1) (2019).

    11. Zhu, D. Hebei Academic Journal (河北学刊), (2) (2017).

    12. Banerjee, A. V., Duflo, E. (2008), What is Middle Class about the Middle Classes around the World?. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 22(2): 3–28.

    13. Birdsall, N. (2010), The (Indispensable) Middle Class in Developing Countries; or, The Rich and the Rest, Not the Poor and the Rest. Center for Global Development Working Paper 207.

    14. Birdsall, N., Graham, C., Pettinato, S. (2000), Stuck in Tunnel: Is Globalization Muddling the Middle Class? Brookings Institution Working Paper No. 14.

    15. Bonnefond, C., Clement, M., Combarnous, F. (2015), In Search of the Elusive Chinese Urban Middle Class: An Exploratory Analysis. Post-Communist Economies. 27(1): 41–59.

    16. Chen, C., Qin, B. (2014), The Emergence of China’s Middle Class: Social Mobility in a Rapidly Urbanizing Economy. Habitat International. 44: 528–535.

    17. Kharas, H. (2010), The Emerging Middle Class in Developing Countries. OECD Development Centre Working Paper No. 285.

    18. Pressman, S. (2007), The Decline of the Middle Class: An International Perspective. Journal of Economic Issues. 41(1): 181–200.

    19. Pressman, S. (2015), Defining and Measuring the Middle Class. American Institute for Economic Research Working Paper 007.

This Article

ISSN:1000-7881

CN: 11-1043/C

Vol , No. 05, Pages 43-55+127

October 2019

Downloads:0

Share
Article Outline

Abstract

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Measurement method of the middle-income group and its evaluation
  • 3 New measurement methods and the measurement results of the middle-income group
  • 4 Comparative analysis of major measurement results
  • 5 Conclusions
  • References