Pop-up English-Chinese

Pensions and multidimensional elderly poverty and inequality: a comparative perspective on urban and rural non-compulsory pension insurance

XIE E1

(1.School of Economics, Shandong University)

【Abstract】This paper uses the panel data of 2012 and 2014 CFPS to build elderly’s Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) and Correlation Sensitive Poverty Index (CSPI) , which includes consumption, health, living conditions (housing) , life satisfaction and future confidence in China. It then evaluates the effect of two non-compulsory pensions insurances, new rural resident pension insurance system and urban resident pension insurance system, on multidimensional poverty and inequality using the 2SLS fuzzy Regression Discontinuity Design techniques to account for the issue of endogeneity. The results show that urban and rural elderly multidimensional poverty and inequality of 2014 were lower than those of 2012.The future confidence is the largest contribution to urban and rural multidimensional poverty in 2012, while in 2014 is the housing condition. New rural resident pension insurance system and urban resident pension insurance system have no significant effect on not only the decrease of multidimensional poverty and multidimensional inequality of the elderly but also each of dimension in multidimensional poverty and multidimensional inequality. Suggestions derived from these findings are to continue to expand the coverage of two kinds of old-age insurance, to improve the level of pensions for urban and rural residents, and to remove bundled attendance.

【Keywords】 the elderly population; multidimensional poverty; inequality; pension insurance;

【DOI】

【Funds】 The phased achievement of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71673167).

Download this article

    Footnote

    [1]. (1) Due to space limitation, it is not listed here. [^Back]

    References

    1. Feng, J. et al. Economic Research Journal (经济研究), (11) (2010).

    2. Guo, X. & Zhou, Q. Economic Research Journal (经济研究), (6) (2016).

    3. Sui, D. et al. Social Sciences of Beijing (北京社会科学), (7) (2014).

    4. Wang, C. & Ye, Q. Economic Research Journal (经济研究), (12) (2014).

    5. Zhu, H. Social Sciences of Beijing (北京社会科学), (9) (2017).

    6. Alkire, Sabina, Foster, James (2011), Counting and Multidimensional Poverty Measurement. Journal of Public Economics. 95(7): 476–487.

    7. Atika Pasha (2016), Impact of Cash Grants on Multidimensional Poverty, Working Paper.

    8. Lawton M., P. (1982), Competence, Environmental Press, and the Adaptation of Older People, In: Lawton M. P., Windley P. G., Byerts T. O., editors. Aging and the Environment: Theoretical Approaches. New York: Springer, 33–59.

    9. McCrary, J. (2008), Manipulation of the Running Variable in the Regression Discontinuity Design: A Density Test. Journal of Econometrics. 142(2): 698–714.

    10. Rippin, N. (2015), Multidimensional Poverty in Germany: A Capability Approach, Working Paper.

    11. Sen, A. (1999), Development as Freedom, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.

    12. Thorbecke, E. (2011), A Comment on Multidimensional Poverty Indices. Journal of Economic Inequality. 9(3): 45–87.

    13. Van der Klaauw, W. (2002), Estimating the Effect of Financial Aid Offers on College Enrollment: A Regression-Discontinuity Approach. International Economic Review. 43(4): 1249–1287.

This Article

ISSN:1000-7881

CN: 11-1043/C

Vol , No. 05, Pages 62-73+127

October 2017

Downloads:6

Share
Article Outline

Abstract

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Data sources, index selection and multidimensional poverty and inequality measurement
  • 3 Breakpoint regression method
  • 4 Empirical analysis
  • 5 Conclusions and policy suggestions
  • Footnote

    References