A study of payment mechanism of flexible employment in pension insurance: from the perspective of families’ expected utility

MU Huaizhong1 CHEN Yang2 CHEN Xi1

(1.Institute of Population Research, Liaoning University)
(2.School of Economics, Liaoning University)

【Abstract】From the perspective of family, this paper examines the impact of families' expected utility on payment mechanism of flexible employment in pension insurance. The paper points out that risk aversion mentality of the insured, unexpectation of personal life cycle, the differences of local institution or policy, and the utility loss after delaying retirement are the internal mechanisms that restrict insured families’ expected utility and affect their insurance decision. According to the above four internal incentive mechanisms, three system schemes are designed, and an insured families' expected utility model is established. The quantitative analysis finds that the risk duration and risk degree of the insured family are positively correlated to the pay duration and pay level. However, the current system scheme is still incentive and becomes more incentive with the expansion of life expectancy. ‍The scheme 1 should be adjusted timely according to long-time risk duration and high level of risk. The scheme 2, in some regions, improves expected utility but does not conform to the rule of endowment insurance development. The scheme 3 with a large relevant legal basis is the best choice leading to a win-win situation of the government and the families. With the above analysis, some relevant suggestions are put forward.‍

【Keywords】 pension insurance; flexible employment; rate of participating in pension insurance; families’ expected utility; life expectancy;

【DOI】

【Funds】 This paper is a phased achievement of project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71373110).

Download this article

(Translated by LIU Jiao)

    Footnote

    [1]. (1) Calculated according to data of 2014 China Labor Statistical Yearbook. [^Back]

    [2]. (1) Data are from 2009 China Human Resources and Social Security Yearbook (the working volume). [^Back]

    [3]. (2) Rate of participating in pension insurance = number of flexible employees participating in workers’ pension insurance / number of flexible employees. Data are from China Statistical Yearbook and 2015 China Pension Report. [^Back]

    [4]. (3) Data are from 2011 and 2012 China Pension Report, and 2014 and 2015 annual report by China Social Insurance Fund. [^Back]

    [5]. (1) Urban employees’ pension insurance adopts different calculating methods for the “old employees,” “middle-aged employees” and “new employees.” However, subjects of flexible employees in pension insurance are new employees, so it is assumed that flexible employees are “new employees.” [^Back]

    [6]. (1) At present, earnings of individual accounts are calculated as per interest income of one-year deposit of the bank. [^Back]

    [7]. (2) Standards of invalidity pensions are different in different situations. Comparatively speaking, this group is of small number and great particularity, so they are not the focus of this paper. It is assumed the insured do not withdraw invalidity pensions here. [^Back]

    [8]. (1) See Article 18 of Interim Measures of the Basic Pension Insurance of Urban Flexible Employees in Hubei and Article 9 of the Decision of Sichuan on Improving the System of the Basic Old Age Insurance for Enterprise Employees. [^Back]

    [9]. (1) Data of 2014 World Health Statistics reveal that overall life expectancy in China had increased 6 years over the past 22 years, in which life expectancy of Chinese males had increased nearly 7 years. According to this speed, life expectancy of males can reach about 80 years old in 2035. [^Back]

    References

    1. Deng, D. & Yang, J. Statistics and Decision (统计与决策), (19) (2007).

    2. Dong, X. & Luo, W. Theory Journal (理论学刊), (2) (2010).

    3. Gao, W. & Gao, M. Journal of Central China Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences) (华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)), 54(03): 38–43 (2015).

    4. He, P. Research on Social Security Issues of Informal Employment (非正规就业群体社会保障问题研究), China Labor Social Security Publishing House, (2008).

    5. Li, L., Zuo, X. & Song, Ze. Statistical Research (统计研究), 31(05): 61–65 (2014).

    6. Li, L., Song, Z. & Chen, Q. The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics (数量经济技术经济研究), 32(05): 88–100 (2015).

    7. Liu, Q. & Shen, Y. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Social Sciences) (成都理工大学学报(社会科学版)), 20(05): 66–72 (2012).

    8. Sun, T. Journal of Northwest Normal University (Social Sciences) (西北师大学报(社会科学版)), 52(03): 16–23 (2015).

    9. Wang, G. et al. Population & Economics (人口与经济), (06): 78–85 (2011).

    10. Wei, X. & Yu, L.The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics (数量经济技术经济研究), 29(01): 78–90 (2012).

    11. Xiao, J. & Hu, P. Economist (经济学家), (12) (2014).

    12. Yang, C. Tribune of Social Sciences (社会科学论坛), (9) (2014).

    13. Yang, Y. & He, W. Chinese Journal of Population Science (中国人口科学), (06): 35–45, 127 (2015).

    14. Yin, W. & Ye, N. Journal of Zhejiang University (Humanities and Social Sciences) (浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)), 40(01): 152–160 (2010).

    15. Zeng, Y. Journal of China Institute of Industrial Relations (中国劳动关系学院学报), (01): 50–54 (2008).

    16. Zheng, C. Chinese Journal of Population Science (中国人口科学), (01): 88–97, 128 (2013).

    17. Ginneken W. (1999), Social Security for the Informal Sector: A New Challenge for the Developing Countries.International Social Security View. 52(1): 49–69.

    18. Holzmann R., Stiglitz J.E. eds..(2001), New Ideas about Old-Age Security. Washington DC: Toward Sustainable Pension Systems in the 21st Century AUTHOR, World Bank.

    19. Midgley, J., & Tracy, M. (1996), Challenges to Social Security: An International Exploration. Auburn House.

This Article

ISSN:1000-7881

CN: 11-1043/C

Vol , No. 06, Pages 11-24+126

December 2016

Downloads:3

Share
Article Outline

Abstract

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Theoretical analysis of families’ expected utility for the payment of pension insurance
  • 3 Model construction and parameter selection of the families’ expected utility for payment of pension insurance
  • 4 Empirical analysis of families’ expected utility for the payment of pension insurance
  • 5 Pathway of improving families’ expected utility of the payment of pension insurance
  • 6 Conclusion and suggestion
  • Footnote

    References