Relationship between anticipated communication and creativity: the moderating role of construal level

LUAN Mo1,2 WU Shuang2,3 LI Hong2,4

(1.Business School, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing, China 100029)
(2.Department of Psychology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China 100084)
(3.Rady School of Management, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA)
(4.Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Shenzhen 518055)

【Abstract】The current research examines the influence of anticipated communication on creativity and the moderating role of construal levels in this process. Experiment 1 adopted a structured imagination task to explore the main effect of anticipated communication on creativity. The results of Experiment 1 showed that compared with the no anticipated communication group, the anticipated communication group showed higher creativity. Experiment 2 used a creative generation task to measure creativity and examined the moderating role of construal levels. Results of Experiment 2 suggested that when completing abstract and high construal-level tasks, the anticipated communication group showed higher creativity in dimensions of originality and flexibility, but there was no difference in creativity between the two groups in terms of concrete and low construal-level tasks. That is to say, anticipated communication promotes creativity only when creative tasks require abstract and high construal-level thinking. In conclusion, this study, based on previous studies on communication and creativity and construal level and creativity, found that for abstract creative tasks, merely anticipated communication enhances creativity even though the actual communication has not yet occurred.

【Keywords】 anticipated communication; creativity; construal level; moderating effect;

【DOI】

【Funds】 National Natural Science Foundation of China (71871124) The National Social Science Fund of China (20AZD085)

Download this article

    References

    Aiken, M., & Hage, J. (1971). The organic organization and innovation. Sociology, 5(1), 63–82.

    Amabile, T. M. (1979). Effects of external evaluation on artistic creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(2), 221–233.

    Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(5), 997–1013.

    Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357–376.

    Amabile, T. M. (1985). Motivation and creativity: Effects of motivational orientation on creative writers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(2), 393–399.

    Amabile, T. M., & Pillemer, J. (2012). Perspectives on the social psychology of creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(1), 3–15.

    Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organization Science, 3(3), 321–341.

    Barron, F. (1955). The disposition toward originality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(3), 478–485.

    Dijksterhuis, A., & Meurs, T. (2006). Where creativity resides: The generative power of unconscious thought. Consciousness and Cognition, 15(1), 135–146.

    Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2003). Effects of communication goals and expectancies on language abstraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 682–696.

    Ebadi, Y. M., & Utterback, J. M. (1984). The effects of communication on technological innovation. Management Science, 30(5), 572–585.

    Förster, J., Friedman, R. S., & Liberman, N. (2004). Temporal construal effects on abstract and concrete thinking: Consequences for insight and creative cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 177–189.

    Grant, A. M., & Berry, J. (2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 54(1), 73–96.

    Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-based Approach (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Publications.

    Hirt, E. R., Devers, E. E., & McCrea, S. M. (2008). I want to be creative: Exploring the role of hedonic contingency theory in the positive mood-cognitive flexibility link. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(2), 214–230.

    Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1122–1131.

    Jia, L., Hirt, E. R., & Karpen, S. C. (2009). Lessons from a faraway land: The effect of spatial distance on creative cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(5), 1127–1131.

    Joshi, P. D., & Wakslak, C. J. (2014). Communicating with the crowd: Speakers use abstract messages when addressing larger audiences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(1), 351–362.

    Joshi, P. D., Wakslak, C. J., Raj, M., & Trope, Y. (2016). Communicating with distant others: The functional use of abstraction. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(1), 37–44.

    Kanter, R. M. (1988). Three tiers for innovation research. Communication Research, 15(5), 509–523.

    Koestler, A. (1964). The Act of Creation. New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Lepper, M. R., Greene, D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1973). Undermining children’s intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the “overjustification” hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28(1), 129–137.

    Lu, J. G., Akinola, M., & Mason, M. F. (2017). “Switching On” creativity: Task switching can increase creativity by reducing cognitive fixation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 139, 63–75.

    Lu, J. G., Hafenbrack, A. C., Eastwick, P. W., Wang, D. J., Maddux, W. W., & Galinsky, A. D. (2017). “Going out” of the box: Close intercultural friendships and romantic relationships spark creativity, workplace innovation, and entrepreneurship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(7), 1091–1108.

    Monge, P. R., Cozzens, M. D., & Contractor, N. S. (1992). Communication and motivational predictors of the dynamics of organizational innovation. Organization Science, 3(2), 250–274.

    Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103(1), 27–43.

    Paulus, P. B., & Nijstad, B. A. (2003). Group Creativity: Innovation Through Collaboration. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

    Plucker, J. A., & Makel, M. C. (2010). Assessment of creativity. In J. C.Kaufman & R. J.Sternberg (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (pp. 48–73). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

    Polman, E., & Emich, K. J. (2011). Decisions for others are more creative than decisions for the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(4), 492–501.

    Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Educating for innovation. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1(1), 41–48.

    Semin, G. R., de Montes, G. L., & Valencia, J. F. (2003). Communication constraints on the linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(2), 142–148.

    Shalley, C. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 33–53.

    Shalley, C. E., & Perry-Smith, J. E. (2001). Effects of social-psychological factors on creative performance: The role of informational and controlling expected evaluation and modeling experience. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84(1), 1–22.

    Silvia, P. J., Winterstein, B. P., Willse, J. T., Barona, C. M., Cram, J. T., Hess, K. I., ... Richard, C. A. (2008). Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: Exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(2), 68–85.

    Simonton, D. K. (2000). Creativity: Cognitive, personal, developmental, and social aspects. American Psychologist, 55(1), 151–158.

    Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., & Fong, G. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 845–851.

    Steinmetz, J., & Pfattheicher, S. (2017). Beyond social facilitation: A review of the far-reaching effects of social attention. Social Cognition, 35(5), 585–599.

    Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440– 463.

    Uziel, L. (2007). Individual differences in the social facilitation effect: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(3), 579–601.

    Uziel, L. (2010). Look at me, I’m happy and creative: The effect of impression management on behavior in social presence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(12), 1591–1602.

    Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1989). Levels of personal agency: Individual variation in action identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 660–671.

    van de Ven, A. H. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32(5), 590–607.

    Ward, T. B. (1994). Structured imagination: The role of category structure in exemplar generation. Cognitive Psychology, 27(1), 1–40.

    Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293–321.

This Article

ISSN:0439-755X

CN: 11-1911/B

Vol 52, No. 10, Pages 1178-1188

October 2020

Downloads:2

Share
Article Outline

Abstract

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Experiment 1: the effect of anticipated communication on creativity
  • 3 Experiment 2: the role of construal level in the ef­f­ect of anticipated communication on creativity
  • 4 General discussion
  • References