Research on the dynamic mechanism of social trust production in Internet enterprises
【Abstract】This paper, taking the Internet-based home decoration platform Tubatu as an example, explores the innovation of trust production mechanisms during the development of Internet enterprises. The author argues that the essence of such trust production is to change the relationship structure and to empower the weak in the trust relationship. The root of this process lies in the fact that the ubiquitous technology of the Internet and the fact of de-localization have led to fundamental changes in the number and structure of all parties involved in economic activities. In the expanded overall market, the seller’s autonomy has declined due to intensified competition, and the economic value of the buyer’s demand has been enlarged due to integration. Therefore, the intrinsic motivation of profit-making has greatly stimulated the innovative behavior of enterprises, and promoted social trust and market prosperity.
【Keywords】 social trust ; Internet world ; enterprise innovation ; market expansion ; buyer integration;
. (1) According to the practice, this article treats respondents anonymously. In order to make the readers more impressed with the case, the Book of Family Names is used to sort. The surnames of four family heads who choose Internet-based home decoration are Zhao, Qian, Sun and Li, and those of the four family heads who do not use Internet-based home decoration are Zhou, Wu, Zheng and Wang. The surnames of bosses of the Internet-based home decoration companies are Feng and Chen, and those of bosses of the traditional home decoration companies are Chu and Wei. [^Back]
. (2) The official website of Tubatu (http://www.to8to.com). [^Back]
. (3) Tencent Home (http://news.qq.com/a/20160225/015645.htm). [^Back]
. (4) Due to space limit, this paper only summarizes the operation model of companies such as Tubatu in combination with the research purpose, and the omissions are inevitable. For example, Tubatu has also introduced a bidding mechanism, which allows three companies to design and quote at the same time. Those mechanisms working together attract property owners. For example, Zhao finally chose the company with the lowest offer. [^Back]
. (5) The author agrees with Giddens’ view that power is related to ability in either a broad or narrow sense (Giddens, 2003/1993: 212). Tubatu provides professional supervision services and professional knowledge to owners. In fact, the effort is to improve the owner’s ability and then to increase his/her power in the relationship. It is hereinafter referred to as empowerment. [^Back]
. (6) Zhao said that he had hinted staff from the home decoration company that he might introduce clients to them with the hope that he would receive its excellent service. What is implied here is efforts to produce repeated games. [^Back]
. (7) Liang, J. (http://ask.seowhy.com/article/6231), (2015-12-8). [^Back]
. (8) The concept of community usually emphasizes the common cognition and belonging of members while the demand group is not a community in the strict sense. However, the collective power booms as it exists as a group, and the joining of an individual makes it boast some essential features of the community since it can empower other individuals of the group at the same time. Meanwhile, the demand group is sometimes inspired by common awareness, such as right protection. This article uses the concept of demand community in this sense, and hereby explains. [^Back]
. (9) Manager Feng responsible for Zhao’s home decoration project said that he needed to pay CNY 200 for one piece of home decoration information by Tubatu as the information fee. Tubatu would dispatch three companies to provide designs and quotations for one property owner and the three needed to compete with each other for the project. Manager Feng needs to pay around CNY 7000 as the information fee to Tubatu per month and he is willing to do that. When he ran his own home decoration store, he received a small number of orders from mobile customers. It was extremely hard for him to get orders from those customers. Currently, Manager Zhao, as one of the earliest migrant workers, has managed to transform his company into an Internet-based home decoration company, despite that he had the educational background of senior high school only. He rented one office in the building to sign contracts with clients and for designers to draw pictures. He relies on various platforms and his own webpage to receive orders and the business runs well. [^Back]
. (10) Liu, Q. from Tubatu, (http://caijing.iqilu.com/cjzx/2015/0722/2491468.shtml). [^Back]
. (11) Liu, Q. from Tubatu, (http://caijing.iqilu.com/cjzx/2015/0722/2491468.shtml). [^Back]
. (12) China Industry News, (http://www.cinn.cn/headline/201907/t20190704_214916.html). [^Back]
Cai, S. Contemporary Finance & Economics (当代财经), (12) (2006).
Chen, H. & Jiang, X. Property Rights Guide (产权导刊), (5) (2007).
Chen, L. Sociological Studies (社会学研究), (6) (1998).
Cui, B. & Yin, J. Economic Survey (经济经纬), (2) (2012).
Cui, W., Chen, K. & Cui, X. Social Science Journal (社会科学辑刊), (2) (2014).
Fang, L. Sociological Studies (社会学研究), (2) (2009).
Grimen, H. Philosophical Analysis (哲学分析), (6) (2011).
[US] Fukuyama, F. Trust: the Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. Guo, H. (trans.) Guilin: Guangxi Normal University Press, (2016/1995).
[US] Harding, R. in Warren, M. (eds.) Democracy & Trust. Wu, H. (trans.) Beijing: Huaxia Publishing House, (2004).
Hu, R. Sociological Studies (社会学研究), (3) (2007).
Hu, X. Philosophical Research (哲学研究), (10) (2016).
[UK] Giddens, A. Modernity and Self-identity: Self and Society in Late Modern Age. Zhao, X. & Fang, W. (trans.) Beijing: SDX Joint Publishing Company, (1998/1991).
[UK] Giddens, A. The Consequences of Modernity. Tian, H. (trans.) Nanjing: Yilin Press, (2000/1990).
[UK] Giddens, A. New Rules of Sociological Method: A Positive Critique of Interpretive Sociologies. Tian, Y. & Liu, J. (trans.) Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press, (2003/1993).
Li, H. doctoral thesis, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, (2011).
Li, J. & Yang, Y. Social Security Studies (社会保障研究), (1) (2018).
Li, T., Huang, C., He, X. & Zhou, K. Economic Research Journal (经济研究), (2) (2008).
Li, W., Wu, D. & Xu, H. Nankai Business Review (南开管理评论), (5) (2007).
[Germany] Luhmann, N. Trust: A Mechanism for the Reduction of Social Complexity. Qu, T. & Li, Q. (trans.) Shanghai: Shanghai Century Publishing Group, Shanghai People’s Publishing House, (2005/1973).
Lu, Y. Journal of Fujian University of Technology (福建工程学院学报), (2) (2007).
Luo, H. Business Management Journal (经济管理·新管理), (16) (2003).
[US] Putnam, R. Making Democracy Work. Wang, L. & Lai, H. (trans.) Nanchang: Jiangxi People’s Publishing House, (2001/1999).
Peng, J. Academic Research (学术研究), (2) (2017).
Shuai, M. Sociological Studies (社会学研究), (3) (2013).
Wang, H. Chinese Journal of Sociology (社会), (5) (2009).
Wang, J., Huo, X. & Jia, D. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics (农林技术经济), (2) (2011).
Wang, S. & Liu, X. Sociological Studies (社会学研究), (3) (2002).
Wang, X. Chinese Journal of Management (管理学报), (6) (2006).
Wang, X., Hu, L. & Wang, T. Management Review (管理评论), (12) (2018).
Wu, D. China Economic Quarterly (经济学(季刊)), (3) (2007).
Xie, K. & Xiao, J. Economic Survey (经济经纬), (3) (2014).
Xiong, Y. Commercial Times (商业时代), (31) (2006).
Zhai, X. Social Science Research (社会科学研究), (4) (2008).
Zhai, X. Open Times (开放时代), (4) (2008).
Zhang, W. 信息,信任与法律. Beijing: SDX Joint Publishing Company, (2003).
Zhao, H., Wang, X. & Yang, J. China Management Informationization (中国管理信息化), (8) (2010).
Zhou, X. Commercial Research (商业研究), (10) (2010).
Zhou, X. Sociological Studies (社会学研究), (4) (1999).
Zhou, Y. (ed.) Whom Do We Trust? Social Scientific Investigation in Trust Pattern and Mechanism (我们信谁:关于信任模式与机制的社会科学探索). Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press (2014).
Alesina, Alberto & Eliana La Ferrara 2002, “Who Trusts Others?” Journal of Public Economics 85(2).
Berg, J., J. Dickhaur & K. McCabe 1995, “Trust, Reciprocity and Social History.” Games and Behavior 10.
Camén, C., P. Gottfridsson & B. Rundh 2011, “To Trust or Not to Trust? Formal Contracts and the Building of Long-term Relationships.” Management Decision 49(3).
Doney, P. & J. Cannon 1997, “An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer-Seller Relationship.” Journal of Marketing 61(2).
Gereke, J., M. Schaub & D. Baldassarri 2018, “Ethnic Diversity, Poverty and Social Trust in Germany: Evidence from a Behavioral Measure of Trust.” PLoS ONE 13(7) (https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199834).
Grnroos, C. 1994, “Quo Vadis, Marketing? Toward a Relationship Marketing Paradigm.” Journal of Marketing Management 10(5).
Lyons, B. & J. Mehta 1997, “Contracts, Opportunism and Trust: Self-Interest and Social Orientation.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 21(2).
Mayer, R. C., J. H. Davis & F. D. Schoorman 1995, “An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust.” The Academy of Management Review 20(3).
McKnight, D. H., L. L. Cummings & N. L. Chervany 1998, “Initial Trust Formation in New Organizational Relationships.” Academy of Management 23(3).
Morgan, R. & S. Hunt 1994, “The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing.” Journal of Marketing 58(3).
Rousseau, D., S. Sitkin, R. Burt & C. Camerer 1998, “Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View of Trust.” Academy of Management Review 23(3).
Zucker, L. G. 1985, “Production of Trust: Institutional Sources of Economic Structure, 1840 to 1920.” In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 8). Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.