Mobility turn in policy transfer research: from state-centric to comparative urban approach

XIAO Yun1

(1.School of Government, Sun Yat-sen University)

【Abstract】In the age of globalization, frequent inter-urban policy transfer profoundly transforms the urban governance by connecting local policy regimes to the global urban policy community. Cities have become the most active participants in the global governance system, absorbing and contributing to different models of best practices. However, the traditional policy transfer research is marked by a state-centric approach, which lacks a comparative urban framework to conceptualize the precise process. In light of this deficiency, scholars coined a new term “policy mobility” to account for the inter-urban policy transfer from a multidisciplinary perspective. Policy mobility framework also directs the attention to the global-relational and socio-spatial construction along the process of policy transfer. This paper reviews the origin, theoretical basis and practical significance of the mobility turn. It also proposes future research projects, with the hope to contribute to comparative urban study and the multidisciplinary conversation in policy study in China.

【Keywords】 policy transfer; mobility; urban governance; globalization;

【DOI】

【Funds】 Phased Achievements of Major Project of Ministry of Education Base (16JJD630010)

Download this article

    References

    Bauman, Z. Liquid Modernity (流动的现代性). Shanghai: Shanghai Joint Publishing Company, (2002).

    Chen, F. Journal of Xiamen University (Arts & Social Sciences) (厦门大学学报 (哲学社会科学版) ), (6)(2013).

    Chen, X. & Yang, X. Journal of Public Management (公共管理学报),(3)(2009).

    He, X. & Yuan, Y. Journal of East China Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) (华东师范大学学报 (哲学社会科学版) ), (6) (2017).

    He, Y. & Li, N. Wuhan University Journal (Philosophy & Social Sciences) (武汉大学学报 (哲学社会科学版)), (1) (2017).

    Miao, C. Human Geography (人文地理), (4) (2004).

    Tang, We. Journal ofSocial Sciences (社会科学), (8) (2011).

    Wang, F. & Liu, Y. Human Geography (人文地理), (5) (2015).

    Wu, J., Liang, M., Su, T. et al., Journal of Public Management (公共管理学报), (1) (2011).

    Wu, Y. Journal of East China Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) (华东师范大学学报 (哲学社会科学版) ), (6) (2017).

    Yang, X. Public Management Research (公共管理研究), (1) (2011).

    Zhou, L. 转型中的地方政府—官员激励与地方治理. Shanghai: Gezhi Publishing House (2008).

    Zhu, Y. Wuhan University Journal(Philosophy & Social Sciences) (武汉大学学报 (哲学社会科学版)), (4) (2010).

    Zhu, Y. & Xiao, D. Sociological Study (社会学研究), (3) (2014).

    Allen, J. & A. Cochrane 2010, “Assemblages of State Power: Topological Shifts in the Organization of Government and Politics.” Antipode 42 (5).

    Andrews, M. 2012, “The Logical Limits of Best Practice Administrative Solutions in Developing Countries.” Public Administration and Development 32 (2).

    Baker, T. & C. Temenos 2015, “Urban Policy Motilities Research: Introduction to a Debate.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 39 (4).

    Beaumont, J. & W. Nicholls 2007, “Between Relationality and Territoriality: Investigating the Geographies of Justice Movements in the Netherlands and the United States.” Environment and Planning A 39 (11).

    Benson, D. & A. Jordan 2011, “What Have We Learned from Policy Transfer Research? Dolowitz and Marsh Revisited.” Political Studies Review 9 (3).

    Berry, F. S. & W. D. Berry 2014, Innovation and Diffusion Models in Policy Research: Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder: Westive Press.

    Binkley, S. & J. Capetillo 2009, “Foucault for the 21st Century: Governmentality, Biopolitics and Discipline in the New Millennium.” Journal of Experimental Biology 27 (3–4).

    Bockman, J. & G. Eyal 2002, “Eastern Europe as a Laboratory for Economic Knowledge: The Transnational Roots of Neo-Liberalism.” American Journal of Sociology 108.

    Brannan, T., C. Durose, P. John & H. Wolman 2008, “Assessing Best Practice as a Means of Innovation.” Local Government Studies 34 (1).

    Brenner, N. 2004, New State Spaces:Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Brenner, N. 2010, “The Urban Question as a Scale Question: Reflections on Henri Lefebvre, Urban Theory and the Politics of Scale.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 24 (2).

    Brenner, N. & N. Theodore 2002, “Cities and the Geographies of Actually Existing Neoliberalism” In N. Brenner & N. Theodore (eds.), Spaces of Neoliberalism.Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Bulmer, S., D. Dolowitz, P. Humphreys & S. Padgett 2007, Policy Transfer in the European Union. London: Routledge.

    Castells, M. 2000, The Rise of the Network Society. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Clarke, N. 2012, “Urban Policy Mobility, Anti-politics and the Histories of the Transnational Municipal Movement.” Progress in Human Geography 31 (1).

    Cook, I. R. 2015, “Policy Mobilities and Interdisciplinary Engagement.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 39 (4).

    Cochrane, A. 2007, Understanding Urban Policy. A Critical Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Cohen, M.D., J. G.March & J.P.Olsen 1972, “A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice.” Administrative Science Quarterly 17 (1).

    Cresswell, T. 2006, On the Move: Mobility in the Modern Western World. London and New York: Routledge.

    Czarniawska, B. 2002, A Tale of Three Cities. Or the Globalization of City Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Dolowitz, D. P. & D. Marsh 1996, “Who Learns What from Whom?A Review of the Policy Transfer Literature.” Political Studies 44 (2).

    Dussauge-Laguna, M. 2012, “On the Past and Future of Policy Transfer Research:Benson and Jordan Revisited.” Political Studies Review 10 (3).

    Evans, M.2006, “At the Interface Between Theory and Practice: Policy Transfer and Lesson Drawing.” Public Administration 84 (2).

    Evans, M.2009, “Policy Transfer in Critical Perspective.” Policy Studies 30 (3).

    Fawcett, P.& D.Marsh 2012, “Policy Transfer and Policy Success: The Case of the Gateway Review Process (2001-2010).” Government and Opposition 47 (2).

    Gilardi, F.2010, “Who Learns from What in Policy Diffusion Processes?” American Journal of Political Science 54 (3).

    Hannam, K., M.Sheller & J.Urry 2006, “Mobilities, Immobilities and Moorings.” Mobilities 1 (1).

    Harvey, D.1982, The Limits to Capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Harvey, D.1993, “From Space to Place and Back Again: Reflections on the Condition of Modernity.” In D. Harvey (ed.), Justice, Nature and the Politics of Difference. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Heyman, J. M. & H. Cunningham 2004, “Movement on the Margins: Mobility and Enclosures at Borders.” Identities 11 (3).

    James, O.& M.Lodge 2003, “The Limitations of ‘Policy Transfer’ and ‘Lesson Drawing’ for Public Policy Research.” Political Studies Review 1 (2).

    Kantor, P. & H. V. Savitch 2005, “How to Study Comparative Urban Development Politics: A Research Note.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 29 (1).

    Kingdon, J. W. 1984, Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.

    Larner, W. 2001, “Governing Globalisation: The New Zealand Call Centre Attraction Initiative” Environment and Planning 33 (2).

    Larner, W.2002, “Globalization, Governmentality, and Expertise: Creating a Call Centre Labour Force.” Review of International Political Economy 9 (4).

    Larner, W.2003, “Neoliberalism?” Environment and Planning D:Society and Space 21 (1).

    Larner, W.& R.Le Heron 2002, “The Spaces and Subjects of a Globalizing Economy: A Situated Exploration of Method.” Environment and Planning D:Society and Space 20 (2).

    Lindblom, C.E.1979, “Still Muddling, Not Yet Through.” Public Administration Review 39 (6).

    Lodge, M.2003, “Competition Policy: From Centrality to Muddling Through.” In Dyson, Kenneth & Klaus H. Goetz (eds.) Germany, Europe, and the Politics of Constraint. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Marston, S.A.2000, “The Social Construction of Scale.” Progress in Human Geography 24 (2).

    Massey, D. 2005, For Space. London: Sage.

    Massey, D. 2007, World City. London: Polity.

    Massey, A. 2009, “Policy Mimesis in the Context of Global Governance.” Policy Studies 30 (3).

    McCann, E.2008, “Expertise, Truth, and Urban Policy Mobilities: Global Circuits of Knowledge in the Development of Vancouver, Canada’s ‘Four Pillar’ Drug Strategy.” Environment and Planning A 40 (4).

    McCann, E.2011a, “Urban Policy Mobilities and Global Circuits of Knowledge:Toward a Research Agenda.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 101 (1).

    McCann, E. 2011b, “Knowledge of Elsewhere in the Politics of Urban Drug Policy.” In E. McCann & K. Ward (eds.), Mobile Urbanism:Cities & Policymaking in the Global Age. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    McCann, E.2012, “Policy Assemblages, Mobilities and Mutations:Towards a Multi-disciplinary Conversation.” Political Studies Review 10 (3).

    McCann, E.& K.Ward 2010, “Relationality/ Territoriality: Toward a Conceptualization of Cities in the World.” Geoforum 41 (2).

    McCann, E.& K.Ward 2011, “Urban Assemblages:Territories, Relations, Practices and Power.” In E. McCann & K. Ward (eds.), Mobile Urbanism:Cities & Policymaking in the Global Age. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    McCann, E. & K.Ward 2012, “Policy Assemblages, Mobilities and Mutations:Toward a Multidisciplinary Conversation.” Political Studies Review 10 (3).

    McCann, E. & K. Ward 2015, “Thinking Through Dualisms in Urban Policy Mobilities.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 39 (4).

    Nadesan, M. H. 2008, Governmentality, Biopower and Everyday Life. London: Routledge.

    Peck, J. 2003, “Geography and Public Policy: Mapping the Penal State.” Progress in Human Geography 27 (2).

    Peck, J. 2005, “Struggling with the Creative Class.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 29 (4).

    Peck, J. 2011, “Geographies of Policy: From Transfer-diffusion to Mobility-mutation.” Progress in Human Geography 35 (6).

    Peck, J. & N. Theodore 2001, “Exporting Workfare/ Importing Welfare-to-work: Exploring the Politics of Third Way Policy Transfer.” Political Geography 20 (2).

    Peck, J. & N. Theodore 2008, “Embedding Policy Mobilities”. Working Paper, Department of Geography, University of British Columbia.

    Peck, J. & N. Theodore 2010, “Mobilising Policy Models, Methods and Mutations.” Geoforum, 41 (3).

    Peck, J. & A.Tickell 2002, “Neoliberalizing Space.” In N. Brenner & N. Theodore (eds.) Spaces of Neoliberalism. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Prince, R. 2010, “Policy Transfer as Policy Assemblage: Making Policy for the Creative Industries in New Zealand.” Environment and Planning A 42 (2).

    Robertson, D. B. & J. L. Waltman 1993, “The Politics of Policy Borrowing.” In D. Finegold, L. McFarland & W. Richardson (eds.), Something Borrowed, Something Learned? The Transatlantic Market in Education and Training Reform. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

    Robinson, J. 2011, “Cities in a Word of Cities: The Comparative Gesture.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35 (1).

    Robinson, J. 2015, “‘Arriving at’ Urban Policies: The Topological Spaces of Urban Policy Mobility.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 39 (4).

    Rogers, E. M. 1983, Diffusion of Innovation. New York: The Free Press.

    Rose, R. 1993, Lesson-Drawing in Public Policy. Chatham: Chatham House Publishers.

    Rose, N. & P. Miller 1992, “Political Power beyond the State:Problematics of Government.” British Journal of Sociology 43 (2).

    Sabatier, P. A. 1987, “Knowledge, Policy Oriented Learning, and Policy Change: An Advocacy Coalition Framework.” Science Communication 8 (4).

    Sartori, G. 1970, “Concept Misinformation in Comparative Politics.” The American Political Science Review 64 (4).

    Sayer, A. 1992, Method in Social Science:A Realist Approach. London and New York: Routledge.

    Sheller, M. 2004, “Mobile Publics: Beyond the Network Perspective.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 22 (1).

    Sheller, M. & J. Urry 2006, “The New Mobilities Paradigm.” Environment and Planning A 38 (1).

    Stone, D.1999, “Learning Lessons and Transferring Policy Across Time, Space and Disciplines.” Politics 19 (1).

    Stone, D. 2004, “Transfer Agents and Global Networks in the ‘Transnationalization’ of Policy.” Journal of European Public Policy 11 (3).

    Taylor, P. J. 2007, World City Network. London and New York: Routledge.

    Temenos, C. & T. Baker 2015, “Enriching Urban Policy Mobilities Research.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 39 (4).

    Temenos, C. & E. J. McCann 2013, “Geographies of Policy Mobilities.” Geography Compass 7 (5).

    Urry, J. 2000, Sociology Beyond Societies: Mobilities for the Twenty-first Century. London and New York: Routledge.

    Urry, J.2004, “Connections.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 22 (1): 27-37.

    Urry, J. 2007, Mobilities. London: Polity.

    Walker, J.1969, “The Diffusion of Innovations among the American States.” American Political Science Review 33 (3).

    Walters, W. 2002, Governmentality:Critical Encounters. New York:Routledge.

    Ward, K.2006, “‘Policies in Motion’, Urban Management and State Restructuring: The Trans-local Expansion of Business Improvement Districts.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 30 (1).

    Ward, K. 2010, “Towards a Relational Comparative Approach to the Study of Cities.” Progress in Human Geography 34 (4).

    Ward, K.2011, “Policies in Motion and in Place: The Case of Business Improvement Districts.” In E. McCann & K. Ward (eds.), Mobile Urbanism:Cities & Policymaking in the Global Age. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Westney, E. D. 1987, Imitation and Innovation: The Transfer of Western Organizational Patterns in Meiji Japan. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

This Article

ISSN:1002-5936

CN: 11-1100/C

Vol 34, No. 03, Pages 219-241+246

May 2019

Downloads:0

Share
Article Outline

Abstract

  • 1 Limitations of traditional policy transfer research
  • 2 Post-transfer era: from policy transfer to urban policy mobility
  • 3 Mobility turn: understanding new dimensions of urban policy making and innovation
  • 4 Some thoughts on research issues of policy mobility
  • References