Zero-sum and expansionist thinking and religious policies of pre-modern empires: an analysis framework centered on church-state relations

SUN Yanfei1

(1.Department of Sociology, Zhengjiang University)

【Abstract】Recent scholars of pre-modern empires like to compare pre-modern empires with modern nation-states and stress the propensity of pre-modern empires to tolerate diverse religions and cultures under their control. This emphasis, however, belies the fact that the religious policies of pre-modern empires differ significantly: while some allowed all kinds of religions to exist and flourish, others persecuted heretics and non-believers, and carried out forced conversions. This paper examines the religious policies of 23 pre-modern empires and ranks them into six tiers according to their degree of tolerance towards non-state religions. Arguing against the existing theory that highlights state capacity of empires as the key to explaining their religious tolerance, it proposes a new theory that stresses the nature of the state religion and the related church-state relations. More specifically, it argues that pre-modern empires associated with a state religion that had a zero-sum mentality towards other religions and a strong drive to convert people tended to be intolerant towards non-state religions. Among these empires, those whose political power was more circumscribed by the power of the state religion are found to be even more religiously intolerant.

【Keywords】 pre-modern empires; religious tolerance; church-state relations; zero-sum and expansionist thinking;

【DOI】

Download this article

    Footnote

    [1]. (1) The Chinese “基督教” mentioned in this paper corresponds to Christianity in English and is a general designation for all denominations that take Jesus Christ as their savior. [^Back]

    [2]. (2) Zhou has conducted many meaningful discussions on the governance logic of the Chinese Empire in recent years (Zhou, 2014, 2016). However, from a theoretical point of view, there are two problems in his view: first, he ignores the influence of ideology on the logic of an empire’s behavior; and secondly, the various “imperial logics” he proposed and analyzed are often only some general organizational behavior logics, not peculiar to empires. [^Back]

    [3]. (3) When Weber uses the concept of “world religion,” he refers to several major religions or value systems with followers of wide geographical distribution and far-reaching influence on the process of world history. Mann also uses this concept in this sense. For them, world religions generally include Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, Judaism, and sometimes Confucianism and Taoism. [^Back]

    [4]. (4) Please refer to Sun (2017). [^Back]

    [5]. (5) This study is still in progress. This paper is the result of the first stage of the study, focusing on the empires that appeared in Eurasia and had great influences on the process of world history. The Buddhist and Hindu empires have yet to be included. [^Back]

    [6]. (6) The religious policies of Cyrus the Great and Darius the Great, which were very tolerant of the conquered peoples, were not unique in ancient Near East empires deeply rooted in polytheistic traditions. For political reasons, these empires sometimes forcibly moved people, even desecrated and destroyed their temples, but they all allowed conquered peoples to continue to believe in their gods. [^Back]

    [7]. (7) He was the emperor of the eastern half of the Roman Empire from 379 to 392 and the emperor of the unified Roman Empire from 392 to 395. [^Back]

    [8]. (8) For example, such persecution and conversion occurred during the reigns of the Byzantine emperors Heraclius I (610–641) and Basil I (867–886). [^Back]

    [9]. (9) In the Reconquista, the persecution of Jews began in the 14th century in places that the Spanish forces had regained control from the Muslim regimes. In 1391, social riots and massacres against Jews swept through many cities, forcing a large number of Jews to convert to Christianity. After that, the royal family grew more and more strict with the Jews and formulated and implemented discriminatory policies. In order to identify the hypocrites and heretics among the Jews who converted to Christianity, the royal family established the Inquisition in 1478 (Kamen, 2014). [^Back]

    [10]. (10) “Zero-sum nature” in this paper refers to a state where my gain is your loss, and the more I gain, the more you lose. In other words, zero-sum nature is a strong exclusivity. [^Back]

    [11]. (11) The definition of religion can start from two approaches, namely, functional definition and substantive definition. According to most functional definitions, Confucianism can undoubtedly be regarded as a religion. Most substantive definitions regard interactions with supernatural forces as the most essential feature of religion. According to this definition, Confucianism may not be a typical religion. [^Back]

    [12]. (12) Even so, out of religious piety and fanaticism, individual kings of these empires may deviate from the more tolerant religious policies, which once again proves the dominance of ideology. For example, the Mughal Empire’s Aurangzeb renounced the tolerant policies of previous emperors because of its devout Sunni faith, triggering an insurgency by Hindus and Sikhs, which led to a sharp decline in the country’s fortunes and the empire soon fell apart. [^Back]

    [13]. (13) Advocacy of Ghazan Khan of the Ilkhanate of Islam as the state religion is a typical example. [^Back]

    References

    Ma, R. Academic Monthly (学术月刊), (1) (2008).

    Wang, J. Historical Review (史林), (1) (2003).

    Wang, Z. Social Sciences in China (中国社会科学), (1) (1992).

    Zhao, D. Beijing Cultural Review (文化纵横), (1) (1992).

    Zhao, Y. Government Regulations and Policies toward the Religions and Religious Believers during the Ming Dynasty (明代国家宗教管理制度与政策研究). Beijing: China Social Sciences Press, (2008).

    Zhao, X. Open Times (开放时代), (4) (2014).

    Zhao, X. Chinese Journal of Sociology (社会), (1) (2016).

    Abisaab, Rula Jurdi 2004, Converting Persia: Religion and Power in the Safavid Empire. New York: I. B. Tauris.

    Arendzen, J. 1910, “Manichaeism.” The Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.

    Asmussen, J. P. 1983, “Christians in Iran.” In Ehsan Yarshater (ed.), The Cambridge History of Iran. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Barkey, Karen 2008, Empire of Difference: The Ottomans in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Bivar, A. D. H. 1983, “The Political History of Iran Under the Arsacids.” In Ehsan Yarshater (ed.), The Cambridge History of Iran. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Bowersock, Glen Warren 1996, Hellenism in Late Antiquity. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Burbank, Jane & Frederick Cooper 2010, Empires in World History: Power and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Chazan, Robert 1987, European Jewry and the First Crusade. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Cohen, Jeremy 1999, Living Letters of the Law: Ideas of the Jew in Medieval Christianity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Dale, Stephen F. 2009, The Muslim Empires of the Ottomans, Safavids, and Mughals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    de Ste. Croix, Geoffrey E. M. 2006, Christian Persecution, Martyrdom, and Orthodoxy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Deane, Jennifer Kolpacoff 2011, A History of Medieval Heresy and Inquisition. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Doyle, Michael W. 1986, Empires. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Emmerick, R. E. 1983, “Buddhism among Iranian Peoples.” In Ehsan Yarshater (ed.), The Cambridge History of Iran. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Evans, Peter 1995, Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Fried, Johannes 2016, Charlemagne. Translated by Peter Lewis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Gibbon, Edward 1837/1776, The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. London: Frederick Westley & A. H. Davis.

    Hall, John A. 1985, Powers and Liberties: The Causes and Consequences of the Rise of the West. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Hall, John A. 2012, “Imperial Universalism—Further Thoughts.” In Peter Fibiger Bang & Dariusz Kolodziejczyk (eds.), Universal Empire: A Comparative Approach to Imperial Culture and Representation in Eurasian History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Herrin, Judith & Dimiter Angelov 2012, “The Christian Imperial Tradition—Greek and Latin.” In Peter Fibiger Bang & Dariusz Kolodziejczyk (eds.), Universal Empire: A Comparative Approach to Imperial Culture and Representation in Eurasian History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Hume, David 1957, The Natural History of Religion. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Hussey, J. M. 2010, The Orthodox Church in the Byzantine Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Kamen, Henry 2014, The Spanish Inquisition: A Historical Revision. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Kaplan, Benjamin J. 2009, Divided by Faith: Religious Conflict and the Practice of Toleration in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Kumar, Krishan 2017, Visions of Empire: How Five Imperial Regimes Shaped the World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Laitin, David D. 2009, “Empires in Macro-Sociology.” International Studies Review 11 (3).

    Lane, George 2006, Daily Life in the Mongol Empire. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.

    Lewis, Bernard 1994, Islam and the West. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Mallowan, Max 1985, “Cyrus the Great (558–529 B.C.).” In I. Gershevitch (ed.), The Cambridge History of Iran. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Mann, Michael 1986, The Sources of Social Power: Volume 1, A History of Power from the Beginning to AD 1760. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Menocal, María Rosa 2002, The Ornament of the World: How Muslims, Jews, and Christians Created a Culture of Tolerance in Medieval Spain. New York: Little Brown.

    Mesa, Enrique Soria 2012, “Los Moriscos Que Se Quedaron. La Permanencia de La Población de Origen Islámico En La Espaňa Moderna (Reino de Granada, Siglos XVII–XVIII).” Vínculos de Historia 1.

    Migdal, Joel S. 1988. Strong Societies and Weak States: State-Society Relations and State Capabilities in the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Momigliano, Arnaldo & Simon Price 2005, “Roman Religion: The Imperial Period.” Encyclopedia of Religion. Detroit, MI: Macmillan Reference.

    Moore, Robert I. 2008, The Formation of a Persecuting Society: Authority and Deviance in Western Europe 950–1250. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Neusner, Jacob 1983, “Jews in Iran.” In Ehsan Yarshater (ed.), The Cambridge History of Iran. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Perry, Mary Elizabeth 2013, The Handless Maiden: Moriscos and the Politics of Religion in Early Modern Spain. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Rist, Rebecca 2016, Popes and Jews, 1095–1291. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Rose, Jenny 2014, Zoroastrianism: An Introduction. New York: I. B. Tauris.

    Sharf, Andrew 1971, Byzantine Jewry from Justinian to the Fourth Crusade. New York: Schocken Books.

    Sun, Yanfei 2017, “The Rise of Protestantism in Post-Mao China: State and Religion in Historical Perspective.” American Journal of Sociology 122 (6).

    Weber, Max 1946, From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Yarshater, Ehsan 1983a, “Iranian Common Beliefs and World-View.” In Ehsan Yarshater (ed.), The Cambridge History of Iran. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Yarshater, Ehsan 1983b, “Mazdakism.” In Ehsan Yarshater (ed.), The Cambridge History of Iran. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Zagorin, Perez 2013, How the Idea of Religious Toleration Came to the West. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Zhao, Dingxin 2015, The Confucian-Legalist State: A New Theory of Chinese History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Zhao, Dingxin & John A. Hall 1994, “State Power and Patterns of Late Development: Resolving the Crisis of the Sociology of Development.” Sociology 28.

This Article

ISSN:1002-5936

CN: 11-1100/C

Vol 34, No. 02, Pages 96-122+244

March 2019

Downloads:0

Share
Article Outline

Abstract

  • 1 Concepts and theories
  • 2 Examined objects
  • 3 Measuring the religious tolerance of empires
  • 4 Interpretations
  • 5 Conclusion and discussions
  • Footnote

    References