Transcending westernization and localization: substance and direction of the construction of a sociological discourse with Chinese characteristics in the new era
【Abstract】Sociology with Chinese characteristics in the new era needs to be firm with its direction, responds to practical needs, adjusts its development strategy, pays attention to the construction of discourse and strengthens the influence of the discipline. The degree of maturity of a disciplinary discourse depends largely on the degree of the discipline’s development. The construction of sociological discourse with Chinese characteristics needs to recognize the difference and relationship between it and localization of sociology in China, in order to transcend westernization and localization of sociology. Guided by scientific thoughts, we should aim at promoting and guiding the development of sociology around the world, increasing its ability to respond to major issues, as well as increasing the influence of Chinese sociological discourse. It is a long-term systematic effort to accelerate the construction of sociological discourse with Chinese characteristics, encompassing a variety of projects, such as promoting the guiding ideology, the academic system, talent training, international exchanges and scholars’ abilities.
【Keywords】 new era ; sociology with Chinese characteristics; discourse system; localization; Marxism;
(Translated by LI Hui)
. ① Researcher Jing once pointed out that the ancient and modern problems in China and the Western countries were fundamental and inevitable in Chinese sociology. If this problem was avoided, the so-called Chinese sociology could not be established, or even if it was established, such sociology would never have Chinese styles or Chinese manner, nor could it answer the special questions related to China (Jing, 2014). [^Back]
. ① In this regard, some scholars have carried out special studies. Among them, Researcher Jing explored the historical and cultural roots of Chinese sociology and tried to propose a conceptual system (Jing, 2017). [^Back]
1 Fei, X. Social Science Front (社会科学战线), (3) (1980).
2 Fei, X. 江苏社联通讯, (17) (1981).
3 Fei, X. Social Science Research (社会科学研究), (5) (1982).
4 Fei, X. Chinese Journal of Sociology (社会), (2) (1986).
5 Fei, X. Journal of Peking University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) (北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版), (3) (1997).
6 Fei, X. Social Sciences in China (中国社会科学), (1) (2000).
7 Fei, X. Journal of Peking University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) (北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版), (3) (2003a).
8 Fei, X. Academic Research (学术研究), (7) (2003b).
9 Hong, D. Jiangsu Social Sciences (江苏社会科学), (5) (2010).
10 Jing, T. Academics in China (学术界), (9) (2014).
11 Jing, T. Journal of Beijing University of Technology (Social Sciences Edition) (北京工业大学学报(社会科学版)), (4) (2017).
12 Li, P. People’s Daily (人民日报), (2017–1–23).
13 Lin, N. Sociological Studies (社会学研究), (1) (1986).
14 Xi, J. People’s Daily (人民日报), (2016–5–19).
15 Xi, J. Secure a Decisive Victory in Building a Moderately Prosperous Society in All Respects and Strive for the Great Success of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era—Delivered at the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China (决胜全面建成小康社会,夺取新时代中国特色社会主义伟大胜利—在中国共产党第十九次全国代表大会上的报告). Beijing: People’s Publishing House, (2017)
16 Zheng, H. Jiangsu Social Sciences (江苏社会科学), (5) (2009).
17 Zheng, H. Social Sciences in China (中国社会科学), (2) (2011).
18 Zheng, H. Chinese Social Sciences Today (中国社会科学报), (2014–1–17).