Status constraints and lifestyle transition: latent class analysis of healthy lifestyles among different social strata in China

WANG Fuqin1

(1.Department of Sociology, Tongji University)

【Abstract】This paper used the Chinese General Social Survey data (CGSS2010) to measure the healthy lifestyle of Chinese people through multi-dimensional health behaviors. The analysis finds that people’s lifestyles manifest diversified characteristics, which can be divided into three latent types, namely, the healthy type, the hybrid type and the risky type. Further analysis reveals that individuals with higher socio-economic status adopt both healthy and risky lifestyles, whereas individuals with lower socio-economic status are more inclined to follow the hybrid lifestyle. Overall, the lifestyles of Chinese people are undergoing continuous transition. People from the middle-upper stratum are able to choose a lifestyle beneficial to their health on account of their advantaged position in the social structure. Yet they are also influenced by the Western lifestyle. People from the lower social classes are more constrained by their disadvantaged position in the social structure.

【Keywords】 socio-economic status; healthy lifestyle; lifestyle transition; latent class analysis;

【DOI】

【Funds】 Youth Program of National Social Science Fund of China (12CSH020)

Download this article

(Translated by BAI Dandan)

    Footnote

    [1]. ① The concepts of health behaviors and health lifestyle in this paper are general terms, and they are different from the healthy behaviors or healthy lifestyle in the Chinese context. In order to avoid misunderstanding, modifiers have been added in the paper when referring specifically to negatively unhealthy behaviors or lifestyles. [^Back]

    [2]. ① Pampel et al. (2010) pointed out in the study that there are nine explanations for the negative correlation between low socio-economic status and health behaviors. But one of the latent trait arguments is that statistically negative correlation is a pseudo-correlation rather than a causal relationship. This view has not been supported by empirical studies, so this study does not incorporate it into the analytical framework of individualism or structuralism. [^Back]

    [3]. ① Not all health behaviors require additional economic costs, such as jogging as a healthy form of aerobic exercises does not need any special fees. In contrast, health-risky behaviors, such as smoking and drinking, require the payment of relevant purchase costs. [^Back]

    [4]. ① See “price index” of related China Statistical Yearbook for the consumer price index of “tobacco” and “wine.” [^Back]

    [5]. ② Kim et al. adopted the data of China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS1993), and in the measurement of socio-economic status, only those who had received education in primary school or above were used for the measurement of education level. In terms of lifestyle measurement, behaviors such as diet, smoking, drinking and doing exercises were summarized to obtain the lifestyle index (0–100 scores), and those with a score below 60 were called unhealthy lifestyles, those with a score of 60–80 were called moderately healthy lifestyles, and those with a score above 80 were called healthy lifestyles. These aspects, like the previous studies, have obvious shortcomings. [^Back]

    [6]. ① For the specific sampling plan, please refer to the sampling plan of the second phase of CGSS (2010–2019). Relevant texts can be downloaded from the websites of NSRC at Renmin University of China, (http://www.chinagss.org/) or Chinese National Survey Data Archive (http://www.cnsda.org/). [^Back]

    [7]. ① Kim et al. used the CHNS data in 1993, and this study adopted the CGSS data in 2010; and the data collection time was 17 years apart. [^Back]

    [8]. ① Since the sample sizes of each model are different, and do not nested with each other, only the direction and significance test results of the parameters are compared here. [^Back]

    [9]. ② Except changed variable effects, the reason why parameters are not significant may also be related to the small sample size (only 17.8% of the total sample size) of the birth cohort in or after 1978, and the increase of standard error in parameter estimation. [^Back]

    References

    State Tobacco Monopoly Administration. China Tobacco Yearbook2013 (中国烟草年鉴2013). Beijing: China Science and Technology Press, (2013).

    National Health and Family Planning Commission (China). China Health and Family Planning Statistical Yearbook 2015 (中国卫生和计划生育统计年鉴 (2015)). Beijing: Peking Union Medical College Press, (2015).

    Jiao, K. Sociological Studies (社会学研究), (5) (2014).

    Li, X. The Change and Choice of Life Style (生活方式的变迁与选择). Beijing: People’s Publishing House, (2012).

    Liu, J. & Li, L. Sociological Studies (社会学研究), (3) (2005).

    Qiu, H. Latent Class Modeling: Principles and Techniques (潜在类别模型的原理与技术), Beijing: Educational Science Publishing House, (2008).

    Weber, M. Economy and Society Vol. 1. Lin, R. (trans.) Beijing: The Commercial Press, (2004/1946).

    Wang, F. Chinese Journal of Sociology (社会), (2) (2012).

    China Alcoholic Drinks Association & Editorial Board of Yearbook of China Alcoholic Drinks Industry. Yearbook of China Alcoholic Drinks Industry 2012–2013 (中国酒业年鉴2012–2013). Beijing: China Light Industry Press, (2015).

    Zhu, D. Social Sciences in Guangdong (广东社会科学), (3) (2013).

    Abel, Thomas, William C. Cockerham & Steffen Niemann 2000, “A Critical Approach to Lifestyle and Health.” In J. Watson & S. Platt (eds.), Researching Health Promotion. New York: Routledge.

    Biddle, Jeff E. & Daniel S. Hamermesh 1990, “Sleep and the Allocation of Time.” Journal of Political Economy 98(5).

    Bourdieu, Pierre 1984, Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Chan, C. W. & S. F. Leung 2015, “Lifestyle Health Behaviors of Hong Kong Chinese: Results of a Cluster Analysis.” Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health 27(3).

    Christensen, V. T. & R. M. Carpiano 2014, “Social Class Differences in BMI among Danish Women: Applying Cockerham’s Health Lifestyles Approach and Bourdieu’s Theory of Lifestyle.” Social Science and Medicine 112.

    Cockerham, William C. 2010, “Health Lifestyles: Bringing Structure Back.” In W. C. Cockerham (ed.), The New Blackwell Companion to Medical Sociology. Willey: Blackwell.

    Cockerham, William C. 2014, Medical Sociology. Routledge.

    Cutler, D. M. & A. Lleras-Muney 2010, “Understanding Differences in Health Behaviors by Education.” Journal of Health Economics 29(1).

    Ferrer, Rebecca A. & William Mp Klein 2015, “Risk Perceptions and Health Behavior.” Current Opinion in Psychology 91.

    Friestad, C. & K. I. Klepp 2006, “socio-economic Status and Health behavior Patterns through Adolescence: Results from a Prospective Cohort Study in Norway.” European Journal of Public Health 16(1).

    Gilbert, P. A. & S. E. Zemore 2016, “Discrimination and Drinking: A Systematic Review of the Evidence.” Social Science and Medicine 161.

    Griep, Rosane H., Aline A. Nobre, Márcia Gm Alves, Maria Jm Da Fonseca, Letícia O Cardoso Luana Giatti, Enirtes Cp Melo, Susanna Toivanen & Dóra Chor 2015, “Job Strain an Unhealthy Lifestyle: Results from the Baseline Cohort Study, Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (Elsa-Brasil).”BMC Public Health 15(1).

    Kaljee L. M. & X. Chen 2011, “Social Capital and Risk and Protective Behaviors: A Global Health Perspective.” Adolescent Health Medicine and Therapeutics 2(2).

    Kawachi, Ichiro, S. V. Subramanian & Daniel Kim 2008, Social Capital and Health. New York: Springer.

    Kim, Soowon, Michael Symons & Barry M. Popkin 2004, “Contrasting socio-economic Profiles Related to Healthier Lifestyles in China and the United States.” American Journal of Epidemiology 159(2).

    Lindström, Martin 2008, “Social Capital and Health-Related Behaviors.” In I. Kawachi, S. V. Subramanian & D. Kim (eds.), Social Capital and Health. New York, NY: Springer New York.

    Mirowsky, John & Catherine E. Ross 1998, “Education, Personal Control, Lifestyle and Health: A Human Capital Hypothesis.” Research on Aging 20(4).

    Mirowsky, John & Catherine E. Ross 2007, “Life Course Trajectories of Perceived Control and Their Relationship to Education.” American Journal of Sociology 112(5).

    Morris, L. J., C. D’Este, K. Sargent-Cox & K. J. Anstey 2016, “Concurrent Lifestyle Risk Factors: Clusters and Determinants in an Australian Sample.” Preventive Medicine 84.

    Pampel, F. C., P. M. Krueger & J. T. Denney 2010, “socio-economic Disparities in Health Behaviors.” Annual Review of Sociology 36(1).

    Pearlin, L. I. & E. G. Menaghan 1981, “The Stress Process.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior 22(4).

    Popkin, Barry M. 2003, “The Nutrition Transition in the Developing World.” Development Policy Review 21(5–6).

    Powell, L. M., S. Slater, F. J. Chaloupka & D. Harper 2006, “Availability of Physical Activity-Related Facilities and Neighborhood Demographic and socio-economic Characteristics: A National Study.” American Journal of Public Health 96(9).

    Roshchina, Y. 2016, “Health-Related Lifestyle: Does Social Inequality Matter?” Journal of Economic Sociology-Ekonomicheskaya Sotsiologiya 17(3).

    Skalamera, J. & R. A. Hummer 2016, “Educational Attainment and the Clustering of Health-Related Behavior among U.S. Young Adults.” Preventive Medicine 84.

    Wang, Z., F. Zhai, S. Du & B. Popkin 2008, “Dynamic Shifts in Chinese Eating Behaviors.” Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition 17(1).

    World Health Organization (WHO) 2005, Preventing Chronic Diseases: A Vital Investment. WHO Global Report. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Zhai, Feng Ying, Hui Jun Wang, Shu Fa Du, Yuna He, Zhi Hong Wang, Ke You Ge, B. M Popkin, L. Serramajem, J. Ngo & J. Aranceta 2010, “Prospective Study on Nutrition Transition in China.” Nutrition Reviews 67(s1).

    Zhao, M., Y. Konishi & P. Glewwe 2012, “Does Information on Health Status Lead to a Healthier Lifestyle? Evidence from China on the Effect of Hypertension Diagnosis on Food Consumption.” Journal of Health Economics 32(2).

This Article

ISSN:1002-5936

CN: 11-1100/C

Vol 32, No. 06, Pages 117-140+244-245

November 2017

Downloads:0

Share
Article Outline

Knowledge

Abstract

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Low socio-economic status and health-risky behaviors
  • 3 Chinese residents’ lifestyle changes and class differences
  • 4 Research hypotheses
  • 5 Study design
  • 6 Data analysis
  • 7 Conclusion and discussion
  • Footnote

    References