Information governance and social discrimination: the strategy and practice of privacy legislation in China
【Abstract】The actual effect of privacy governance to a large extent depends upon the preferences expressed in the privacy choices of different interest groups or individuals. The issue of privacy governance in the information age must answer the question of who benefits from the protection of privacy. The traditional idea of empowerment governance often ignores the psychological factors of the decision maker, such as his/her cognitive ability and motivation. This causes statistical discrimination and personality discrimination. Research shows that reinforcing privacy control causes the problem of statistical discrimination by shielding normal information flow. At the same time, strengthening privacy self-management causes the problem of personality discrimination by inducing signal transmission. In order to resolve the above dilemma, China should modify its overall direction of privacy governance, explore the privacy decision variables in the complex situation full of constraints, as well as take moderate, scientific and efficient interventions. By doing so, it can predict and regulate privacy behaviors in a more accurate manner.
【Keywords】 information governance; statistical discrimination; personality discrimination; signaling; privacy legislation;
(Translated by GUO Yue)
Aronson, E., Timothy, D. Wilson & Robin M. Akert Social Psychology (社会心理学). Hou, Y et al. (trans) Beijing: World Publishing Corporation, (2012).
Bai, J. & Lian, Li. Management World (管理世界), (6) (2012).
Posner, R. The Economics of Justice (正义/司法的经济学). Su, L. (trans) Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law Press, (2002).
Vermeij, G. Nature: An Economic History (自然地经济史). Wang, Z. (trans) Hangzhou: Zhejiang University Press, (2012).
Goffman, O. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (日常生活中的自我呈现). Feng, G. (trans) Beijing: Peking University Press, (2008).
Ge, Y. & Zeng, X. Economic Research Journal (经济研究), (6) (2011).
Xing, H. Youth Studies (青年研究), (2) (2007).
Hu, L. Peking University Law Journal (中外法学), (2) (2012).
Jiang, C. Economic Research Journal (经济研究), (9) (2010).
Jing, J. Sociological Studies (社会学研究), (5) (2006a).
Jing, J. Social Science (社会科学), (8) (2006b).
Li, C. & Li, S. Sociological Studies (社会学研究), (2) (2008).
Liu, L., Zhang, Y. & Li, Y. Statistical Research (统计研究), (7) (2012).
Liu, N. Sociological Studies (社会学研究), (6) (2005).
Mayer-Schönberger, V. & Cukier, K. Big Data: Revolution that Will Transform How We Live, Work and Think. Sheng, Y. & Zhou, T. (trans) Hangzhou: Zhejiang University Press, (2013).
Turkle, S. Alone Together (群体性孤独). Zhou, K. & Liu, J. (trans) Hangzhou: Zhejiang University Press, (2014).
Wan, H. & Li, S. Economic Research Journal (经济研究), (9) (2013).
Wang, L. The Jurist (法学家), (1) (2012).
Xia, G. & Yang, X. Social Sciences in China (中国社会科学), (6) (2006).
Xu, X. Sociological Studies (社会学研究), (1) (2009).
Zhang, W. Game theory and Society (博弈与社会). Beijing: Peking University Press, (2013).
Zhang, X. Studies on Public Privacy under a Transformation of Mass Media (大众媒体变迁中的隐私公开现象研究). Beijing: China University of Communication Press, (2012).
Zhang, X. & Ren, Y. Chinese Journal of Law (法学研究), (6) (2013).
Acquisti, A., L. Brandimarte & G. Loewenstein 2015, “Privacy and Human Behavior in the Age of Information.” Science 347.
Allport, G. W. 1954, The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Altman, I. & D. Taylor 1973, Social Penetration: The Development of Interpersonal Relationships. California: Holt, Rinehart & Wioston.
Aronson, E. & D. Bridgeman 1979, “Jigsaw Groups and the Desegregated Classroom: In Pursuit of Common Goals.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 5.
Ayres, I. 1991, “Fair Driving: Gender and Race Discrimination in Retail Car Negotiations.” Harvard Law Review, 104.
Beales II, J. H. & T. J. Muris 2008, “Choice or Consequences: Protecting Privacy in Commercial Information.” The University of Chicago Law Review, 75.
Brandimarte, L., A. Acquisti, & G. Loewenstein 2013, “Misplaced Confidences: Privacy and the Control Paradox.” Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4.
Calo, R. 2014, “Digital Market Manipulation.” The George Washington Law Review, 82.
Cialdini, R. B. & N. J. Goldstein 2004，“Social Influence: Compliance and Conformity.” Annual Review of Psychology, 55.
Crawford, V. P. & J. Sobel 1982, “Strategic Information Transmission.” Econometrica, 50.
DePaulo, B. M. & W. L. Morris 2006, “The Unrecognized Stereotyping and Discrimination Against Singles.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 15.
Granovetter, M. 1985, “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.” The American Journal of Sociology, 91.
Holzer, H. J., S. Raphael & M, A. Stoll 2006, “Perceived Criminality, Criminal Background Checks and the Racial Hiring Practices of Employers.” The Journal of Law and Economics, 49.
Janger, E. J. & P. M. Schwartz 2002, “The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, Information Privacy, and the Limits of Default Rules.” Minnesota Law Review, 86.
Jolls, C., C. R. Sunstein & R. Thaler 1998 “A Behavioral Approach to Law and Economics.”Stanford Law Review, 50.
Jolls, C. & C. R. Sunstein. 2006, “Debiasing through Law.” The Journal of Legal Studies, 35.
Kunda, Z. & K. C. Oleson 1997, “When Exceptions Prove the Rule: How Extremity of Deviance Determines the Impact of Deviant Examples on Stereotypes.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72.
Lewis, G.2011, “Asymmetric Information, Adverse Selection and Online Disclosure: The Case of eBay Motors.” The American Economic Review, 101.
Lundberg, S. J. 1991, “The Enforcement of Equal Opportunity Laws Under Imperfect Information: Affirmative Action and Alternatives.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106.
McAdams，R. H. 1996, “Group Norms, Gossip, and Blackmail.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 144.
Montjoye, Y. D.，L. Radaelli, V. K. Singh & A. S. Pentland 2015, “Unique in the Shopping Mall: On the Reidentifiability of Credit Card Metadata.” Science, 347.
Peppet, S. R. 2011, “Unraveling Privacy: The Personal Prospectus and the Threat of A Full-Disclosure Future.” Northwestern University Law Review, 105
Persico, N. 2002, “Racial Profiling, Fairness, and Effectiveness of Policing.” The American Economic Review, 92.
Persico, N. & P. E. Todd 2005, “Passenger Profiling, Imperfect Screening, and Airport Security.” The American Economic Review, 95.
Peterson, C. 2010, “Losing Face: An Environmental Analysis of Privacy on Facebook.” (Available at: http://etc.cpeterson.org/research/workingpapexs/2010/Iosmg/Iosmgxs/2010/Ios.pdf)
Phelps, E. S. 1972, “The Statistical Theory of Racism and Sexism.” The American Economic Review, 62.
Schwab, S. 1986, “Is Statistical Discrimination Efficient?” The American Economic Review, 76.
Schwartz, P. M. 2005, “Privacy Inalienability and the Regulations of Spyware.” Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 20.
Schwartz, P. M. & D. J. Solove 2011, “The PII Problem: Privacy and a New Concept of Personally Identifiable Information.” New York University Law Review, 86.
Slovic, P. 1995, “The Construction of Preference.” The American Psychologist 50.
Solove, D. J. 2013, “Introduction: Privacy Self-Management and the Consent Dilemma.” Harvard Law Review, 126.
Sovem, J. 1999, “Opting In, Opting Out, or No Options At All: The Fight for Control of Personal Information.” Washington Law Review, 74.
Spence, M. 1973, “Job Market Signaling.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87.
Stiglitz, J. E. & A. Weiss 1981, “Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information.” The American Economic Review, 71.
Strahilevitz, L. J. 2008a, “Privacy versus Antidiscrimination.” The University of Chicago Law Review, 75.
Strahilevitz, L. J. 2008b, “Reputation Nation: Law in an Era of Ubiquitous Personal Information.” Northwestern University Law Review, 102
Strahilevitz, L. J. 2013, “Toward a Positive Theory of Privacy Law.” Harvard Law Review, 126.
Sunstein, C. R. 2013, “Deciding by Default.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 162.
Weber, R. & J. Crocker 1983, “Cognitive Processes in the Revision of Stereotypic Beliefs.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45.