From health advantage to health disadvantage: the epidemiological paradox in rural migrants

LI Jianmin1,2 WANG Ting1 SUN Zhishuai1

(1.School of Economics, Nankai University)
(2.Collaborative Innovation Center for China Economy, Nankai University)

【Abstract】Using the data from China Labor-force Dynamics Survey, this paper analyzed the change of health gap between rural migrants and urban residents as well as the mechanisms causing this change in the process of rural-urban migration. By applying the logit model and Fairlie non-linear decomposition method, we have the following findings. (1) There is a health loss mechanism during the rural-urban migration process in accordance with the “epidemiological paradox.” A transition is observed from health advantage into health disadvantage for rural migrants comparing to urban residents, suggesting that rural-urban migration has a negative impact on the health conditions of rural migrants. (2) The health maintenance factor and the health loss factor are important reasons for the health gap between rural migrants and urban residents, while the health loss factor is more important. Variables such as living environment, individual income deprivation, workload, and living with spouse have great contribution to the health gap. (3) The changing trend of health conditions of male and female rural migrants is consistent with the whole sample. The relationship of the health conditions between male and female rural migrants is in line with the “gender paradox of health,” with different factors affecting the health conditions of male and female rural migrants.

【Keywords】 rural migrants; urban residents; epidemiological paradox; health maintenance factor; health loss factor;

【DOI】

Download this article

    Footnote

    [1]. (1) In this paper, “China” refers specifically to Chinese mainland (editor’s note). [^Back]

    [2]. (2) The migrants (floating population) refers to a group of people whose permanent residence are different from their household registration places and have left the household registration places for more than half a year. In view of the purpose of this study, samples of urban-rural migrants, urban-urban migrants, rural residents, and migrants who had returned to their hometowns were excluded. [^Back]

    [3]. (3) Another commonly used method to classify self-rated health is to assign a score of 0 to the options “very healthy,” “healthy” and “fair,” and assign a score of 1 to the options “unhealthy” and “very unhealthy.” This study also used this classification method to fit the data. The results were consistent with the basic conclusions of this paper. [^Back]

    [4]. (4) Kakwani’s formula for calculating the deprivation of individual income yi is as follows:Among them, Y is a group with the sample number of n, arranged in ascending order of income, namely, y1y2 ≤ . . . ≤ yn. The income vector is y = (y1, y2, . . . yn), and MY is the mean of the group Y. [^Back]

    [5]. (5) The data was compiled by the authors according to the China Health and Family Planning Statistical Yearbook 2017. [^Back]

    [6]. (6) BMI = [^Back]

    [7]. (7) This study used the variance inflation factor (VIF) to perform multi-collinearity test. The maximum VIF was 1.61, which is much smaller than the empirical rule of 10. Therefore, there was no multi-collinearity. [^Back]

    References

    1 Baker E. H., Rendall M. S. and Weden M. M. 2015. Epidemiological Paradox or Immigrant Vulnerability? Obesity Among Young Children of Immigrants. Demography 4: 1295–1320.

    2 Benjamins M. R., Hummer R. A., Eberstein I. W. and Nam C. B. 2004. Self-reported Health and Adult Mortality Risk: An Analysis of Cause-specific Mortality. Social Science & Medicine 6: 1297–1306.

    3 Benzeval M. and Judge K.2001. Income and Health: The Time Dimension. Social Science & Medicine 9: 1371–1390.

    4 Birch S. and Gafni A. 2005. Achievements and Challenges of Medicare in Canada: Are We There Yet? Are We on Course? International Journal of Health Services 3: 443–463.

    5 Dean J. A. and Wilson K. 2010. “My Health has Improved Because I Always Have Everything I Need Here…”: A Qualitative Exploration of Health Improvement and Decline among Immigrants. Social Science & Medicine 8: 1219–1228.

    6 Duleep H. O. and Dowhan D. J. 2008. Research on Immigrant Earnings. Social Security Bulletin 1: 31–50.

    7 Fairlie R. W. 1999. The Absence of the African-American Owned Business: An Analysis of the Dynamics of Self Employment. Journal of Labor Economics 1: 80–108.

    8 Fairlie R. W. 2003 An Extension of the Blinder-Oaxaca Decomposition Technique to Logit and Probit Models. Social Science Electronic Publishing 30: 305–316.

    9 Findley SE. 1988. The Directionality and Age Selectivity of the Health-Migration Relation: Evidence from Sequences of Disability and Mobility in the United States. International Migration Review 3: 4–29.

    10 Gravelle H. and Sutton M. 2009. Income, Relative Income, and Self-reported Health in Britain 1979–2000. Health Economics 2: 125–145.

    11 Henriksen K. and Blom S. 2009. Living Conditions among Immigrants in Norway 2005/2006. Statistics Norway.

    12 Houle R. and Yssaad L. 2010. Recognition of Newcomers’ Foreign Credentials and Work Experience. Statistics Canada 75: 18–33.

    13 Hu X., Cook S. and Salazar M.A. 2008. Internal Migration and Health in China. Lancet 9651: 1717–1719.

    14 Karno M. and Edgerton R. B. 1969. Perception of Mental Illness in a Mexican-American Community. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2: 233–238.

    15 Kakwani N. 1984. The Relative Deprivation Curve and its Applications. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 2: 384–394.

    16 Lu Y. 2008. Test of the ‘Healthy Migrant Hypothesis’: A Longitudinal Analysis of Health Selectivity of Internal Migration in Indonesia. Social Science & Medicine 8: 1331–1339.

    17 Lu Y. 2010. Mental Health and Risk Behaviors of Rural-urban Migrants: Longitudinal Evidence from Indonesia. Population Study 2: 147–163.

    18 Lu Y. and Qin L. 2014. Healthy Migrant and Salmon Bias Hypotheses: A Study of Health and Internal Migration in China. Social Science & Medicine 2: 41–48.

    19 Mcdonald J. T. and Kennedy S. 2004. Insights into the ‘Healthy Immigrant Effect’: Health Status and Health Service Use of Immigrants to Canada. Social Science and Medicine 8: 1613–1627.

    20 Newbold B. 2009. The Short-term Health of Canada’s New Immigrant Arrivals: Evidence from LSIC. Ethnicity & Health 3: 315–336.

    21 Subedi R. P. and Rosenberg M. W. 2014. Determinants of the Variations in Self-reported Health Status among Recent and More Established Immigrants in Canada. Social Science & Medicine 4: 103–110.

    22 Zeman M. V., Hiraki L. and Sellers E. M. 2002. Gender Differences in Tobacco Smoking: Higher Relative Exposure to Smoke than Nicotine in Women. Womens Health Gend Based Med 2: 147–153.

    23 Ji, Y., Yuan, Y. Li, C. et al. Population Journal (人口学刊), (2): 90–96 (2013).

    24 Niu, J. Social Sciences in China (中国社会科学), (2): 46–63 (2013).

    25 Qi, Y. Chinese Journal of Sociology (社会), (6): 196–215 (2014).

    26 Qi, Y., Niu, J., Mason, W. et al. Population Research (人口研究), (1): 102–112 (2012).

    27 Wang, C. & Sun, Z. Modern Preventive Medicine (现代预防医学), (9): 1710–1712 (2013).

    28 Wang, G., Su, X. & Wen, M. Population Research (人口研究), (2): 60–72 (2011).

    29 Zhu, L. Social Sciences in China (中国社会科学), (1): 133–149 (2009).

    30 Zhu, L., Wang, T. Zhou, L. et al. Modern Preventive Medicine (现代预防医学), (18): 3343–3345 (2015).

This Article

ISSN:1002-8986

CN: 11-1170/C

Vol 29, No. 03, Pages 34-52+5-6

June 2015

Downloads:2

Share
Article Outline

Abstract

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Literature review
  • 3 Research hypotheses
  • 4 Models
  • 5 Data and variables
  • 6 Full sample empirical analysis
  • 7 Empirical analysis by sex
  • 8 Robustness test
  • 9 Conclusion and discussion
  • Footnote

    References