Parental influence on women’s second-child birth plan in urban China

JIN Yongai1 ZHAO Menghan1 SONG Jian1

(1.Center for Population Development Studies, Renmin University of China)

【Abstract】Using data from the 2016 fertility survey conducted in 12 cities of 6 provinces in Chinese mainland, this study discussed the intergenerational effects on women’s plan for a second child in the era of universal two-child policy. We only focus on the main targeted group of this policy change—married women aged 20–44 who have only one child in urban China, contributing to the discussions regarding future fertility trend. Overall, the results suggest that parental childcare supports and fertility preferences significantly affect women’s birth plan. Specifically, the probability of having a second-child birth plan is higher if parents can provide childcare assistance, prefer to have two or more grandchildren or have sex preference. Also, family income is positively associated with women’s plan to have a second child and moderates parental effects. The influence of parental sex preference on women’s second child plan is stronger in families with higher income.

【Keywords】 second-child birth plan; parental influence; birth preference; instrumental support;

【DOI】

【Funds】 Projects of National Social Science Fund of China (16CRK003, 15BRK010) Major Project of National Social Science Fund of China (15ZDC036)

Download this article

(Translated by ZHAO Wenyue)

    Footnote

    [1]. ① The study also makes models and analyses of parents and parents-in-law respectively, and the conclusion remains unchanged. [^Back]

    [2]. ② It should be noted that there are only 89 people whose parents and parents-in-law have different preference for the number of children (one party wishes to have two or more children and the other wishes to have one). The conclusion is not affected whether these samples are deleted or put into any category. In order not to lose these samples, we classified either of parents who want to have two or more children into the category where both parents want to have two or more children. [^Back]

    [3]. ① Chi-square tests are all significant. [^Back]

    [4]. ① Calculation method: (exp(0.622) − 1) * 100%. [^Back]

    References

    1 Aassve Arnstein, Elena Meroni, and Chiara Pronzato. 2012. Grandparenting and Childbearing in the Extended Family European. Journal of Population 4: 499–518.

    2 Attané Isabelle. 2016. Second Child Decisions in China. Population and Development Review 3: 519–36.

    3 Axinn William G., Marin E. Clarkberg, and Arland Thornton. 1994. Family Influences on Family Size Preferences. Demography 1: 65–79.

    4 Balbo Nicoletta and Melinda Mills. 2011. The Effects of Social Capital and Social Pressure on the Intention to Have a Second or Third Child in France, Germany, and Bulgaria, 2004-05. Population Studies 3: 335–51.

    5 Bernardi Laura. 2003. Channels of Social Influence on Reproduction. Population Research and Policy Review 225–6: 427–555.

    6 Bian Fuqin, John R. Logan, and Yanjie Bian. 1998. Intergenerational Relations in Urban China: Proximity, Contact, and Help to Parents. Demography 1: 115–24.

    7 Boca Daniela Del. 2002. The Effect of Child Care and Part Time Opportunities on Participation and Fertility Decisions in Italy. Journal of Population Economics 3: 549–73.

    8 Bongaarts John. 2001. Fertility and Reproductive Preferences in Post-Transitional Societies. Population and Development Review 27: 260–81.

    9 Bühler Christoph and Dimiter Philipov. 2005. Social Capital Related to Fertility: Theoretical Foundations and Empirical Evidence from Bulgaria. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 3: 53–81.

    10 Chen Feinian, Guangya Liu, and Christine A. Mair. 2011. Intergenerational Ties in Context: Grandparents Caring for Grandchildren in China. Social Forces 2: 571–94.

    11 Chen Feinian, Susan E. Short, and Barbara Entwisle. 2000. The Impact of Grandparental Proximity on Maternal Childcare in China. Population Research and Policy Review 6: 571–90.

    12 Cook Sarah and Xiao-yuan Dong. 2011. Harsh Choices: Chinese Women’s Paid Work and Unpaid Care Responsibilities under Economic Reform. Development and Change 4: 947–65.

    13 Du Fenglian and Xiaoyuan Dong. 2013. Women’s Employment and Child Care Choices in Urban China during the Economic Transition. Economic Development and Cultural Change 1: 131–55.

    14 García-Morán, Eva, and Zoё Kuehn. 2017. With Strings Attached: Grandparent-Provided Child Care and Female Labor Market Outcomes. Review of Economic Dynamics 23 (January): 80–98.

    15 Hank Karsten and Michaela Kreyenfeld. 2003. A Multilevel Analysis of Child Care and Women’s Fertility Decisions in Western Germany. Journal of Marriage and Family 3: 584–596.

    16 Ji Yingchun. 2015. Between Tradition and Modernity: “Leftover” Women In Shanghai. Journal of Marriage and Family 5: 1057–1073.

    17 Ji Yingchun, Feinian Chen, Yong Cai and Zhenzhen Zheng. 2015. Do Parents Matter? Intergenerational Ties and Fertility Preferences in a Low-Fertility Context. Chinese Journal of Sociology 4: 485–514.

    18 Kaptijn Ralf, Fleur Thomese, Theo G. van Tilburg, and Aart C. Liefbroer. 2010. How Grandparents Matter. Human Nature 4: 393–405.

    19 Kumar Abhishek, Bordone Valeria, and Raya Muttarak. 2016. Like Mother (-in-law) Like Daughter? Influence of the Older Generation’s Fertility Behaviors on Women’s Desired Family Size in Bihar, India. European Journal of Population 5: 629–660.

    20 Lu Yao and Ran Tao. 2015. Female Migration, Cultural Context, and Son Preference in Rural China. Population Research and Policy Review 5: 665–86.

    21 Moscovici Serge and Claude Faucheux. 1972. Social Influence, Conformity Bias, and the Study of Active Minorities. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, edited by Leonard Berkowitz 6: 149–202. Academic Press.

    22 Murphy Rachel, Ran Tao, and Xi Lu. 2011. Son Preference in Rural China: Patrilineal Families and Socioeconomic Change. Population and Development Review 4: 665–90.

    23 Nath, C., Dilip and Kenneth C. Land. 1994. Sex Preference and Third Birth Intervals in a Traditional Indian Society. Journal of Biosocial Science 3: 377–388.

    24 Poston Jr Dudley L. 2002. Son Preference and Fertility in China. Journal of Biosocial Science 3: 333–347.

    25 Qian Yue and Yongai Jin. 2018. Women’s Fertility Autonomy in Urban China: The Role of Couple Dynamics Under the Universal Two-Child Policy. Chinese Sociological Review 1: 1–35.

    26 Tanskanen Antti and Anna Rotkirch. 2014. The Impact of Grandparental Investment on Mothers’ Fertility Intentions in Four European Countries. Demographic Research 1: 1–26.

    27 Waynforth David. 2012. Grandparental Investment and Reproductive Decisions in the Longitudinal 1970 British Cohort Study. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 279, 1155–1160.

    28 Yan Yunxiang. 2013. Parent-Driven Divorce and Individualisation Among Urban Chinese Youth. International Social Science Journal 64. 213–214: 317–330.

    29 Yoon Soo-Yeon. 2017. The Influence of a Supportive Environment for Families on Women’s Fertility Intentions and Behavior in South Korea. Demographic Research 7: 227–254.

    30 Zhao Menghan. 2018. From Motherhood Premium to Motherhood Penalty? Heterogeneous Effects of Motherhood stages on Women’s Economic Outcomes in Urban China. Population Research and Policy Review https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-018-9494-0

    31 Chen, W. & Jin, Y. Population Journal (人口学刊), (2): 3–13 (2011).

    32 Jin, Y. Chinese Social Sciences Today (中国社会科学报), (2017-3-22).

    33 Jin, Y., Song, J. & Chen, W. Population Journal (人口学刊), (6): 22–37 (2016).

    34 Song, J. & Qi, J. Population and Development (人口与发展), (5): 57–64 (2011).

    35 Song, J., Qin, T. & Song, H. Population Journal (人口学刊), (2): 15–25 (2018).

    36 Wang, J. & Yang, X. Journal of Public Administration (公共行政评论) 2: 140–155 (2017).

    37 Xu, Q. Chinese Journal of Sociology (社会), (2): 216–240 (2017).

    38 Yan, Y. & Ni, S. International Social Science Journal (Chinese Edition) (国际社会科学杂志), (1): 143–157 (2016).

    39 Zhao, M. Population Journal (人口学刊), (6): 38–48 (2016).

This Article

ISSN:1000-6087

CN: 11-1489/C

Vol 42, No. 05, Pages 17-29

September 2018

Downloads:0

Share
Article Outline

Abstract

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Literature review and theoretical hypothesis
  • 3 Data and method
  • 4 Analysis result
  • 5 Conclusion and discussion
  • Footnote

    References