Housing sources and its determinants of China's urban youth: empirical analysis based on only-child property and floating features

SONG Jian1 LI Jing1

(1.School of Sociology and Population Studies, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China 100872)

【Abstract】Housing problem has been one of the important economic,social and livelihood issues for youth. Based on the data of 2009 National Urban Youth Survey, ANOVA and multi-nomial logistic regression are used to analyze housing sources and its determinants of urban youth from the perspective of only-child property, floating features and marriage status. It turns out that housing stratification exists among the urban youth. Compared with their counterparts who have siblings, only-children are more likely to purchase houses, but mostly with the aid of their parents. The floating status of youth may lessen the probability of purchasing houses, and make youth more likely to rent houses. The first marriage will dramatically increase the probability of purchasing houses for the youth, and childbearing will increase the probability of purchasing houses for non-only-children. Besides, family and personal characteristics also have significant effects on housing sources of youth. Solving the housing problem of youth will contribute to reducing the social differentiation and promoting the social stability.

【Keywords】 urban youth; housing sources; only-child; floating features; life events;

【DOI】

【Funds】 Supported by Science Research Fund (Central Universities Scietific Research Special Fund) of Renmin University of China: Study on China's social policies in the only-child era (10XNJ025)

Download this article

(Translated by LIU Yingyi)

    Footnote

    [1]. 1 The survey is funded by "Survey and Analysis on Chinese Only-children" Project 985 by Renmin University of China. [^Back]

    [2]. 1 As remarried, divorced and widowed urban young people account for only 0.73% of total sample, only first marriage is considered in this paper. [^Back]

    [3]. 2 Gross income in the questionnaire is a continuous variable, with median being CNY 20,000, upper and lower quartiles being CNY 12,000 and CNY 30,000. [^Back]

    References

    [1] Li, Q. & Wang, M. Academics (学术界), (4): 25-33 (2009).

    [2] Wang, N. & Chen, S. Journal of Lanzhou University (Social Science Edition) (兰州大学学报(社会科学版)) (4): 1-12 (2003).

    [3] Gu, H. Capital Economy (首都经济), (10): 17-20 (1999).

    [4]Yi, Chengdong & Huang, Youqin. Housing Consumption and Housing Inequality in Chinese Cities during the First Decade of the Twenty-First Century [J]. Housing Studies, 2014, 29(2): 291-311.

    [5] Pan, H. Economic Forum (经济论坛), (10): 117-121 (2012).

    [6] Min, X. Chinese Youth Study (中国青年研究), (1): 36-41 (2011).

    [7] Guan, C. & Tang, Y. Real Estate Information of China (中国房地产), (22): 30-40 (2011).

    [8] Zhang, T. Beijing Planning Review (北京规划建设), (4): 54-57 (2012).

    [9] Li, B. Journal of Central South University (Social Science Edition) (中南大学学报(社会科学版)), (2): 166-171 (2004).

    [10] Liu, G., Deng, L. & Li, Z. Chinese Youth Study (中国青年研究), (5): 71-76 (2011).

    [11] Feng, X. Academia Bimestrie (学海), (5): 24-30 (2009).

    [12] Song, J. & Qi, J. Population and Development (人口与发展), (5) 57-64 (2011).

    [13] Wang, L. South China Population (南方人口), (5): 57-64 (2011).

    [14] Feng, X. Journal of Nanjing University (Philosophy, Humanities and Social Science) (南京大学学报(哲学·人文科学·社会科学版)), (1): 73-81 (2011).

    [15] Zhu, D. Jiangsu Social Science (江苏社会科学), (3): 63-68 (2012).

    [16] Sato, Hiroshi. Housing Inequality and Housing Poverty in Urban China in the Late 1990s [J]. China Economic Review, 2006, (17): 37-50.

    [17] Zhang, Z. Population Journal (人口学刊), (2): 16-20 (2005).

    [18] Wu, W. & Wang, H. Sociological Studies (社会学研究), (3): 92-110 (2002).

    [19] Jiang, L., Pang, L. & Zhang, Z. Population Research (人口研究), (4): 16-27 (2005).

    [20] Zhao, W. & Zhang, N. Real Estate Market (房地产市场), (20): 28-34 (2014).

    [21] Wang, X. Jianghai Academic Journal (江海学刊), (1): 101-108 (2013).

    [22]Mcallister, Ian. Housing Tenure and Party Choice in Australia, Britain and the United States [J]. British Journal of Political Science, 1984, 14(4): 509-522.

    [23]Flippen, Chenoa A. Racial and Ethnic Inequality in Homeownership and Housing Equity [J]. The Sociological Quarterly, 2001, 42(2): 121-149.

    [24]Krivo, Lauren J & Kaufman, Robert L. Housing and Wealth Inequality: Racial-Ethnic Differences in Home Equity in the United States [J]. Demography, 2004, 41(3): 585-605.

    [25] Liu, J. & Li, L. Sociological Studies (社会学研究), (3): 52-81 (2005).

    [26]Rex, J & Moore, R. Race, Community and Conflict [M]. London: Oxford University Press, 1967.

    [27]Saunders, P. Beyond Housing Classes: The Sociological Significance of Private Property Rights in the Means of Con sumption [J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1984, 8(2): 202-227.

    [28]Wang, Yaping & Murie, Alan. Social and Spatial Implications of Housing Reform in China [J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2000, 24(2): 397-417.

    [29] Bian, Y. & Liu, Y. Sociological Studies (社会学研究), (3): 82-98 (2005).

    [30] Liu, Z. & Mao, X. Social Science in China (中国社会科学), (2): 94-109 (2012).

    [31] Dong, H. & Guo, Y. Chinese Youth Study (中国青年研究), (4): 5-7 (2008).

    [32] Wang, C. & Liang, H. Seeker (求索), (1): 105-107 (2011).

    [33] Payne, Judy & Payne, Geoff. Housing Pathways and Stratification: A Study of Life Chances in the Housing Market [J]. Journal of Social Policy, 1977, 6(2): 129-156.

This Article

ISSN:1004-129X

CN: 22-1017/C

Vol 37, No. 06, Pages 14-24

November 2015

Downloads:7

Share
Article Outline

Abstract

  • 1 Background
  • 2 Issue, theory and assumption
  • 3 Data sources, main concepts and variables
  • 4 Main housing sources of urban youth
  • 5 Factors that influence housing sources of urban youth
  • 6 Conclusion and discussion
  • Footnote

    References