Source Apportionment of Ambient Carbonyl Compounds Based on a PMF and Source Tracer Ratio Method: A Case Based on Observations in Nanjing
(2.State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Formation and Prevention of the Urban Air Complex, Shanghai Academy of Environmental Sciences, Shanghai, China 200233)
(3.Nanjing Intelligent Environmental Sci-Tech Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China 211800)
【Abstract】Ambient carbonyl compounds play an important role in tropospheric atmospheric chemistry. Primary emissions and photochemical formation are both sources of carbonyls, and therefore it is challenging work to analyze their sources. In this study, carbonyl sources were apportioned using the source tracer ratio method (STR) and positive matrix factorization model (PMF) based on offline carbonyls observations at a site in Nanjing during March 2017. Eleven carbonyl compounds were detected, and their total concentrations were in the range of 2.57 × 10−9–22.83 × 10−9. Formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, and acetone were the main components, accounting for 36.8%, 21.6%, and 18.5% of the average concentration of eleven carbonyl compounds, respectively. The influences of tracer selection and background concentrations on the results of source apportionment using the STR based on comparing the results of acetylene and toluene as tracers and the 5th and 10th percentiles as background concentrations are presented. Five sources were resolved by PMF, including traffic emission, the petrochemical & chemical industry, paint & solvent use, secondary formation & background, and the chemical industry. Secondary formation & background sources were the largest contributors of carbonyl compounds, contributing 56.4%, 48.2%, and 58.3% to formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, and acetone, respectively. By comparing the carbonyl source apportionment results by STR and PMF, it was found that the STR depends on the selection of tracers. When the STR is applied in the areas with complex sources, it is difficult to use a tracer to indicate anthropogenic source emissions, and therefore it is not a suitable method for carbonyl source apportionment.
【Keywords】 carbonyl compounds; source apportionment; source tracer ratio method (STR); positive matrix factorization model (PMF); Nanjing;
(Translated by WANG YX)
 Jiang Z H, Wang Y J, Zheng X, et al. Variation characteristics of atmospheric carbonyl compounds in Zhangjiajie forest [J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2016, 29 (9): 1272–1278 (in Chinese).
 Zhou X M, Tan J H, Xiang P, et al. Chemical characteristics of atmospheric carbonyls in winter and summer in Foshan City [J]. China Environmental Science, 2017, 37 (3): 844–850 (in Chinese).
 Fan Z C, Ma W P, He Y, et al. Pollution characterizations of aldehydes and ketones in haze air during winter domestic heating season of Xi’an [J]. Environmental Pollution and Control, 2019, 41 (1): 85–88 (in Chinese).
 Villanueva-Fierro I, Popp C J, Martin R S. Biogenic emissions and ambient concentrations of hydrocarbons, carbonyl compounds and organic acids from ponderosa pine and cottonwood trees at rural and forested sites in Central New Mexico [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2004, 38 (2): 249–260.
 Wildt J, Kobel K, Schuh-Thomas G, et al. Emissions of oxygenated volatile organic compounds from plants part II: emissions of saturated aldehydes [J]. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry, 2003, 45 (2): 173–196.
 Lin Y C, Schwab J J, Demerjian K L, et al. Summertime formaldehyde observations in New York City: ambient levels, sources and its contribution to HOx radicals [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2012, 117 (D8), doi: 10.1029/2011JD016504.
 Millet D B, Donahue N M, Pandis S N, et al. Atmospheric volatile organic compound measurements during the Pittsburgh Air Quality Study: results, interpretation, and quantification of primary and secondary contributions [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2005, 110 (D7), doi: 10.1029/2004JD004601.
 Friedfeld S, Fraser M, Ensor K, et al. Statistical analysis of primary and secondary atmospheric formaldehyde [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2002, 36 (30): 4767–4775.
 de Gouw J A, Middlebrook A M, Warneke C, et al. Budget of organic carbon in a polluted atmosphere: results from the New England Air Quality Study in 2002 [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2005, 110 (D16), doi: 10. 1029/2004JD005623.
 Duan J C, Tan J H, Yang L, et al. Concentration, sources and ozone formation potential of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) during ozone episode in Beijing [J]. Atmospheric Research, 2008, 88 (1): 25–35.
Chen W T, Shao M, Lu S H, et al. Understanding primary and secondary sources of ambient carbonyl compounds in Beijing using the PMF model [J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2014, 14 (6): 3047–3062.
 Yuan B, Shao M, de Gouw J, et al. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in urban air: how chemistry affects the interpretation of Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) analysis [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2012, 117 (D24), doi: 10.1029/2012JD018236.
 Rappenglück B, Dasgupta P K, Leuchner M, et al. Formaldehyde and its relation to CO, PAN, and SO2 in the Houston-Galveston airshed [J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2009, 9 (6): 24193–24223.
 Parrish D D, Ryerson T B, Mellqvist J, et al. Primary and secondary sources of formaldehyde in urban atmospheres: Houston Texas region [J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2012, 12 (7): 3273–3288.
 Nanjing Municipal Ecology and Environment Bureau. 2019年南京市环境状况公报 [EB/OL]. http://hbj.nanjing.gov.cn/njshjbhj/202006/t20200603_1903785. html, 2020–06–03 (in Chinese).
 Xia S J, Liu Q, Zhao Q Y. Emission inventory of anthropogenically sourced VOCs and its contribution to ozone formation in Jiangsu Province [J]. Environmental Science, 2018, 39 (2): 592–599 (in Chinese).
 Hu K, Wang M, Zheng J, et al. Quantification of the influence of industrial emissions on Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) using PMF model: a case study of Jiangbei industrial zone in Nanjing [J]. Environmental Science, 2018, 39 (2): 493–501 (in Chinese).
 Compendium Method TO-11A, Determination of formaldehyde in ambient air using adsorbent cartridge followed by High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC): active sampling methodology [S].
 Wang M, Zeng L M, Lu S H, et al. Development and validation of a cryogen-free automatic gas chromatograph system (GC-MS/FID) for online measurements of volatile organic compounds [J]. Analytical Methods, 2014, 6 (23): 9424–9434.
 Qian X, Shen H Q, Chen Z M. Characterizing summer and winter carbonyl compounds in Beijing atmosphere [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2019, 214: 116845.
Yang Z, Cheng H R, Wang Z W, et al. Chemical characteristics of atmospheric carbonyl compounds and source identification of formaldehyde in Wuhan, Central China [J]. Atmospheric Research, 2019, 228: 95–106.
 Pang X B, Lee X. Temporal variations of atmospheric carbonyls in urban ambient air and street canyons of a Mountainous city in Southwest China [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2010, 44 (17): 2098–2106.
 Huang X F, Zhang B, Xia S Y, et al. Sources of Oxygenated Volatile Organic Compounds (OVOCs) in urban atmospheres in North and South China [J]. Environmental Pollution, 2020, 261, doi: 10.1016/j.cnvpol.2020.114152.
 Ho K F, Ho S S H, Huang R J, et al. Spatiotemporal distribution of carbonyl compounds in China [J]. Environmental Pollution, 2015, 197: 316–324.
 Jiang Z H, Grosselin B, Daële V, et al. Seasonal, diurnal and nocturnal variations of carbonyl compounds in the semi-urban environment of Orléans, France [J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2016, 40: 84–91.
 Possanzini M, Tagliacozzo G, Cecinato A. Ambient levels and sources of lower carbonyls at Montelibretti, Rome (Italy) [J]. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 2007, 183(1–4): 447–454.
 Atkinson R, Baulch D L, Cox R A, et al. Evaluated kinetic and photochemical data for atmospheric chemistry: volume II-gas phase reactions of organic species [J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2006, 6 (11): 3625–4055.
 Harley R A, Hannigan M P, Cass G R. Respeciation of organic gas emissions and the detection of excess unburned gasoline in the atmosphere [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 1992, 26 (12): 2395–2408.
 Liu Y, Shao M, Fu L L, et al. Source profiles of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) measured in China: part I [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2008, 42 (25): 6247–6260.
 Yuan B, Shao M, Lu S H, et al. Source profiles of volatile organic compounds associated with solvent use in Beijing, China [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2010, 44 (15): 1919–1926.
An J L, Zhu B, Wang H L, et al. Characteristics and source apportionment of VOCs measured in an industrial area of Nanjing, Yangtze River Delta, China [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2014, 97: 206–214.
 Li J, Wu R R, Li Y F, et al. Effects of rigorous emission controls on reducing ambient volatile organic compounds in Beijing, China [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 557–558: 531–541.
 Jobson B T, Berkowitz C M, Kuster W C, et al. Hydrocarbon source signatures in Houston, Texas: influence of the petrochemical industry [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2004, 109 (D24), doi: 10. 1029/2004JD004887.
 Cai C J, Geng F H, Tie X X, et al. Characteristics and source apportionment of VOCs measured in Shanghai, China [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2010, 44 (38): 5005–5014.
 Wang Y T, Li W, Zhang X L, et al. Relationship between atmospheric boundary layer and air pollution in summer stable weather in the Beijing urban area [J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2012, 25 (10): 1092–1098 (in Chinese).