Impact of going public on quality upgrading of export products: evidence from China’s manufacturing firms

ZHU Shujin1 TANG Chao1

(1.School of Economics & Trade, Hunan University)

【Abstract】For the first time, this paper investigated the effect and mechanism of going public on the quality upgrading of export products. Based on the theoretical mechanism of the effect of going public on the quality upgrading of export products from the aspect of management quality, complexity of production technology and quality of intermediate inputs, this paper used the matched data of China’s public firms data, China Industrial Enterprises Database and China’s Customs database from 2000–2013 to provide an empirical test. The results show that going public has a significant promoting effect on the quality upgrading of export products, and in the long run, the effect has one-year lag period and then shows sustainability. After the method of regression estimation and the measurement of key variables are changed and potential omitted variables are controlled, the results are robust. Furthermore, the mediation effect model is used to test the mechanism and the results show that the improvement of management quality and the complexity of production technology are the channels of promoting the quality upgrading of export products, but the channel of improving the quality of intermediate inputs is not available. The conclusion shows that equity financing is beneficial to the quality upgrading of export products, and the management quality improvement arising from the high proportion of long-term institutional investors, production technology innovation and improvement, and the use of diversified intermediate inputs play an important role in the quality upgrading of export products. Therefore, this paper has important policy implications for China to deepen the structural reform of financial supply side and cultivate new competitive advantages for export firms.

【Keywords】 going public; export product quality; long-term institutional investors; management quality; complexity of production technology;

【DOI】

【Funds】 National Natural Science Foundation of China (71573076) The National Social Science Fund of China (18VSJ055)

Download this article

    Footnote

    [1]. ① Data come from National Bureau of Statistics of China (http://www.stats.gov.cn/ztjc/ztfx/ggkf40n/201809/t20180910_1621829.html). [^Back]

    [2]. ① This paper has adjusted different versions of HS codes at 6-digit and make it consistent to the 1996 version. [^Back]

    [3]. ① This paper has also examined the changes in quality of export products adjusted by country-product and time before and after a firm has gone public. The results are shown in the appendix on the website of China Industrial Economics (http://www.ciejournal.org). [^Back]

    [4]. ① The results on the balance diagnostics of propensity score matching can be found in the appendix on the website of China Industrial Economics (http://www.ciejournal.org). [^Back]

    [5]. ① This paper has also visualized the coefficients of key terms in a diagram, as shown in the appendix on the website of China Industrial Economics (http://www.ciejournal.org). [^Back]

    [6]. ②Before running regression, this paper has also examined whether the density function of the driving variables differs significantly on the breakpoints, as shown in the appendix on the website of China Industrial Economics. For the first-stage regression results, see the appendix on the website of China Industrial Economics (http://www.ciejournal.org). [^Back]

    [7]. ① This paper has also used the 1:3 matching ratio as well as the nearest neighbor matching PSM within a caliper for robustness test. In the meantime, this paper has also performed robustness test on the quality of export products after standardization and that measured by σ = 5 and σ = 10. Regression results can be found in the appendix on the website of China Industrial Economics (http://www.ciejournal.org). [^Back]

    [8]. ② The exact calculation steps of different types of institutional investors can be found in the appendix on the website of China Industrial Economics (http://www.ciejournal.org). [^Back]

    [9]. ① Following Bloom et al. (2018), this paper has also used firms’ intermediate inputs-number of the country of origin as a proxy for the complexity of production technology. Results are shown in the appendix on the website of China Industrial Economics (http://www.ciejournal.org). [^Back]

    [10]. ① The treatment of standardization and summation equation can be found in the appendix on the website of China Industrial Economics (http://www.ciejournal.org). [^Back]

    References

    [1] Kong, D., Wang, Y. & Dai, Y. Journal of Financial Research (金融研究), (7): 76–97 (2015).

    [2] Lian, Y., Peng, F. & Su, Z. Journal of Financial Research (金融研究), (10): 158–171 (2010).

    [3] Liu, J. & Xu, H. Journal of Financial Research (金融研究), (9): 141–154 (2012).

    [4] Ma, J., Dong, X., Shi, H. et al. Finance & Trade Economics (财贸经济), (1): 5–21 (2016).

    [5] Shi, B. & Shao, W. Management World (管理世界), (9): 90–106 (2014).

    [6] Su, D., Sheng, B. & Zhao, Z. China Industrial Economics (中国工业经济), (11): 117–135 (2018).

    [7] Wang, H., Xu, H. & Shao, X. The Journal of World Economy (世界经济), (3): 94–117 (2019).

    [8] Wei, H., Bai, M. & Guo, Y. Journal of Financial Research (金融研究), (2): 98–116 (2019).

    [9] Wen, Z., Zhang, L., Hou, J. et al. Acta Psychologica Sinica (心理学报), (5): 614–620 (2004).

    [10] Xu, Z. Economic Research Journal (经济研究), (7): 4–20 (2018.

    [11] Xu, H. & Wang, H. The Journal of World Economy (世界经济), (7): 73–96 (2016).

    [12] Xu, M. The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics (数量经济技术经济研究), (9): 40–57 (2016a).

    [13] Xu, M. Economic Review (经济评论), (5): 96–109 (2016b).

    [14] Yu, M. & Zhang, R. Journal of Macro-quality Research (宏观质量研究), (3): 23–31 (2016).

    [15] Zhang, J., Li, H. & He, H. Journal of Financial Research (金融研究), (5): 160–175 (2017).

    [16] Zhang, M. & Ji, K. China Industrial Economics (中国工业经济), (1): 5–23 (2018).

    [17] Zhu, S., Duan, F., Shao, X. et al. The Journal of World Economy (世界经济), (8): 121–145 (2019).

    [18] Acharya, V. and Xu, Z. (2017). Financial Dependence and Innovation: The Case of Public versus Private Firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 124(2): 223–243.

    [19] Aghion, P., Reenen, J. V. and Zingales, L. (2013). Innovation and Institutional Ownership. American Economic Review, 103(1): 277–304.

    [20] Bena, J. and Li, K. (2014). Corporate Innovations and Mergers and Acquisitions. Journal of Finance, 69(5): 1923–1960.

    [21] Bernini, M., Guillou, S. and Bellone, F. (2015). Financial Leverage and Export Quality: Evidence from France. Journal of Banking & Finance, (59): 280–296.

    [22] Bertrand, M. and Mullianathan, S. (2003). Enjoying the Quiet Life? Corporate Governance and Managerial Preferences. Journal of Political Economy, 111(5): 1043–1075.

    [23] Bloom, N., Manova, K., Reenen, J. V., Sun, S. T. and Yu, Z. (2018). Managing Trade: Evidence from China and the U.S. NBER Working Paper, 2018.

    [24] Broda, C. and Weinstein, D. E. (2006). Globalization and the Gains from Variety. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(2): 541–585.

    [25] Bushee, B. J. (1998). The Influence of Institutional Investors on Myopic R&D Investment Behavior. Accounting Review, 73(3): 305–333.

    [26] Cai, H. and Liu, Q. (2009). Competition and Corporate Tax Avoidance: Evidence from Chinese Industrial Firms. Economic Journal, 119(537): 764–795.

    [27] Chemmanur, T. J., He, S. and Nandy, D. K. (2010). The Going-Public Decision and the Product Market. Review of Financial Studies, 23(5): 1855–1908.

    [28] Coles, J., Daniel, N. and Naveen, L. (2006). Managerial Incentives and Risk-Taking. Journal of Financial Economics, 79(2): 431–468.

    [29] Derrien, F. and Kecskés, A. (2013). The Real Effects of Financial Shocks: Evidence from Exogenous Changes in Analyst Coverage. Journal of Finance, 68(4): 1407–1440.

    [30] Fan, H., Li, Y. A. and Yeaple, S. R. (2015). Trade Liberalization, Quality, and Export Prices. Review of Economics and Statistics, 97(5): 1033–1051.

    [31] Fang, V. W., Tian, X. and Tice, S. (2014). Does Stock Liquidity Enhance or Impede Firm Innovation. Journal of Finance, 5(10): 2085–2125.

    [32] Gao, H., Harford, J. and Li, K. (2013). Determinants of Corporate Cash Policy: Insights from Private Firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 109(3): 623–639.

    [33] Gao, H., Hsu, P. H. and Li, K. (2018). Innovation Strategy of Private Firms. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 53(1): 1–32.

    [34] Hall, B. H. and Lerner, J. (2010). The Financing of R&D and Innovation. Hall, B. H., and N. Rosenberg. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    [35] He, J. and Tian, X. (2013). The Dark Side of Analyst Coverage: The Case of Innovation. Journal of Financial Economics, 109(3): 856–878.

    [36] Head, K. and Ries, J. (2003). Heterogeneity and the FDI versus Export Decision of Japanese Manufacturers. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 17(4): 448–467.

    [37] Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H. and Todd, P. E. (1997). Matching as an Econometric Evaluation Estimator: Evidence From Evaluating a Job Training Programme. Review of Economic Studies, 64(4): 605–654.

    [38] Hummels, D., Ishii, J. and Yi, K-M. (2001). The Nature and Growth of Vertical Specialization in World Trade. Journal of International Economics, 54(1): 75–96.

    [39] Jain, B. A. and Kini, O. (1994). The Post-Issue Operating Performance of IPO Firms. Journal of Finance, 49(5): 1699–1726.

    [40] Jensen, M. C. and Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4): 305–360.

    [41] Khandelwal, A. K., Schott, P. K. and Wei, S. J. (2013). Trade Liberalization and Embedded Institutional Reform: Evidence from Chinese Exporters. American Economic Review, 103(6): 2169–2195.

    [42] Kugler, M. and Verhoogen, E. (2012). Prices, Plant Size, and Product Quality. Review of Econominc Studies, (79): 307–339.

    [43] Lee, D. S. and Lemieux, T. (2010). Regression Discontinuity Designs in Economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(2): 281–355.

    [44] Maksimovic, V., Phillips, G. and Yang, L. (2013). Private and Public Merger Waves. Journal of Finance, 68(5): 2177–2217.

    [45] Matsumoto, D. A. (2002). Management’s Incentives to Avoid Negative Earnings Surprises. Accounting Review, 77(3): 483–514.

    [46] Piveteau, P. and Smagghue, G. (2019). Estimating Firm Product Quality using Trade Data. Journal of International Economics, (118): 217–232.

    [47] Porter, M. E. (1992). Capital Disadvantage: America’s Failing Capital Investment System. Harvard Business Review, 70(5): 65–82.

    [48] Shapiro, C. (1983). Premiums for High Quality Products as Returns to Reputations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98(4): 659–679.

    [49] Stein, J. C. (1989). Efficient Capital Markets, Inefficient Firms: A Model of Myopic Corporate Behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104(4): 655–669.

    [50] Yan, X. and Z. Zhang. (2009). Institutional Investors and Equity Returns: Are Short-Term Institutions Better Informed. Review of Financial Studies, 22(2): 893–924.

    [51] Yu, M. (2015) Processing Trade, Tariff Reductions and Firm Productivity: Evidence From Chinese Firms. Economic Journal, 125(585): 943–988.

This Article

ISSN:1006-480X

CN: 11-3536/F

Vol , No. 02, Pages 117-135+1-8

February 2020

Downloads:0

Share
Article Outline

Abstract

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Analysis of the impact mechanism of public listing of firms on the upgrading of export product quality
  • 3 Data sources, variable definitions and descriptive statistics
  • 4 Baseline regression and robustness test
  • 5 Examination of the impact mechanism
  • 6 Conclusion and policy implication
  • Footnote

    References