Fiscal cost of urbanization of population and its formation mechanism—experience from major world powers since 1960

LI Meng1,2

(1.Research Center of Finance and National Governance, Shanghai Administration Institute 200233)
(2.Institute of Finance and Banking, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences)

【Abstract】The urbanization of population is different from the urbanization of the land world in the key points and performance. The latter is fruitful, while the former is less effective. This paper does research on the government debt formed in the process of the urbanization of population, and draws two conclusions. ① Urbanization is an important driving force of public debt, and the structure of fiscal expenditure plays the role as a bridge. Specifically, urbanization reversely forces governments to transfer fiscal funds from high-productivity constructive projects to low-productivity social projects. As a result, the acceleration of public sectors’ productivity slows down but the cost problem of public sectors is increasingly prominent, and the gap of fiscal revenue and expenditure is formed and continuously increased. Different social projects have the order of priorities in the allocation of fiscal funds. Those compressive funds for constructive projects are generally used for social insurance and welfare spending, and health expenditure. In the changing process of urban spatial form, when population move from gathering to spreading, public facilities will be repeatedly constructed and operated inefficiently, and it may accelerate the transformation of fiscal structure. ② The fiscal impact of urbanization is different in different stages of urbanization. When the urbanization rate is over 55%, the influence coefficient of urbanization on the government debt will be more significant, due to the changing flow of essential production factors in private sectors. In the early-mid stage, essential factors mainly shift from agriculture that has lower productivity to the manufacturing industry and the service industry that have higher productivity. The structural acceleration of economic growth has partially covered up the problem of the public debt. In the mid-late stage, essential factors shift from the manufacturing industry that has higher productivity to the service industry that has lower productivity. In this way, the structural slowdown in economic growth and the transformation of the structure of fiscal expenditure form a superimposed effect and completely exposes the public debt together.

【Keywords】 urbanization; government debt; structure of fiscal expenditure;

【DOI】

【Funds】 Youth Project of National Social Science Fund (15CJL009)

Download this article

(Translated by LV yafei)

    Footnote

    [1]. ① It should be noted that “cheng zhen hua (townization)” is a concept with Chinese characteristics. In the relevant official documents issued by the government, the expression of “cheng zhen hua (townization)” is used more. As this paper mainly focuses on the international experience, the expression of “cheng shi hua (urbanization)” is used unanimously. [^Back]

    [2]. ① Covering the costs of social insurance, urban infrastructure construction, housing, living and intelligence. [^Back]

    [3]. ② Including housing, basic pension insurance, residents of cooperative medical care, social insurance fees, compulsory education fees of children of migrant workers and urban management fees. Including housing, basic pension insurance, residents of cooperative medical care, social insurance fees, compulsory education fees of children of migrant workers and urban management fees. [^Back]

    [4]. ③ In this paper, the citizenization cost of migrant workers is divided into three parts: public cost, individual cost and enterprise cost. [^Back]

    [5]. ④ Some studies believe that the Chinese government is still an economically constructive government,[15] and the government finance has significant constructive characteristics.[16, 17] The main purpose of the government debt financing in Western countries is to bridge the gap of pension systems, make up for public consumption deficit and redistribute the revenue. However, the government debt financing in China is mainly used for infrastructure construction and public welfare projects, forming land reserves, municipal facilities, transportation facilities, indemnificatory housing and other large quantities of high-quality assets, which have the considerable operating revenue as a source of debt payment and the basis is more solid.[18, 19] [^Back]

    [6]. ① It is worth mentioning that Jiao[22] believes the S-shape curve of urbanization originates from the book of Economic Geography edited by the American economic geologist scholar Northam, and named it as Northam Curve. Since then, most of the studies related to the urbanization curve in China will refer to the contribution of Northam, while ignoring the research of the United Nations. [^Back]

    [7]. ① Wherein, the constructive characteristics are reflected in the horizontal comparison between foreign countries and China, which means China’s fiscal funds are used more in economic affairs. Consumer tendencies are reflected in the vertical comparison between the past and the present, which means the current fiscal funds are increasingly used in non-economic affairs. [^Back]

    References

    [1] Li, Y. Scientific Development (科学发展), (10): 5–8 (2014).

    [2] Research Group in Development Research Center of the State Council. Management World (管理世界), (6): 9–18 (2014).

    [3] Glaeser, E. Urban Public Finance. NBER Working Paper, 2012.

    [4] Wildasin, D. Urban Public Finance. Chur, Switzerland: Harwood Academic Press, 1986.

    [5] Tiebout, C. A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 1956, 64(5): 416–424.

    [6] Buchanan, J., and R. Wagner. Democracy in Deficit: The Political Legacy of Lord Keynes. New York: Academic Perss, 1997.

    [7] Ferreira, F., and J. Gyourko. Do Political Parties Matter? Evidence from U. S. Cities. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2009, 124(1): 399–422.

    [8] Jetter, M., and C. Parmeter. Does Urbanization Mean Bigger Governments. Documentos de trabajo Economía y Finanzas, 2013.

    [9] ZHANG, G. China Soft Science (中国软科学), (4): 56–69 (2009).

    [10] Research Group of Development Research Centre of the State Council. Reform (改革), (5): 5–29 (2011).

    [11] Pan, J. & Wei, H. Urban Development Report in China: Citizenization of Agricultural Transferring Population. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press, 2013.

    [12] Qu, X. & Cheng, J. Reform (改革), (3): 37–44 (2013).

    [13] Qu, X. & Xu, D. Economic Perspectives (经济学动态), (2): 36–43 (2014).

    [14] Yu, H. Economic Research Journal (经济研究), (10): 104–118 (2015).

    [15] An, T. & Ren, Q. Finance & Trade Economics (财贸经济), (8): 48–53 (2007).

    [16] Li, Y. China Economic Quarterly (经济学季刊), (1): 307–332 (2010).

    [17] Fu, W. & Shen, K. Economic Research Journal (经济研究), (5): 45–57 (2012).

    [18] Wang, G. & Zhang, Y. Economic Perspectives (经济学动态), (9): 14–23 (2014).

    [19] Yang, C. & Lu, Y. Public Finance Research (财政研究), (9): 50–57 (2015).

    [20] United Nations. Methods for Projections of Urban and Rural Population. Population and Development Review, 1975, (2): 320–331.

    [21] Northam, R. Urban Geography. New York: Wiley, 1979.

    [22] Jiao, X. City Planning (城市规划), (5): 34–38 (1987).

    [23] Chen, M., Ye, C. & Zhou, Y. Geographical Research (地理研究), (08): 1499–1507 (2011).

    [24] Li, E. Population Research (人口研究), (3): 28–40 (2014).

    [25] Jeanne, O., and G. Anastasia. Government Debt in Emerging Market Countries: A New Dataset. IMF Working Paper, 2006.

    [26] Jaimovich, D., and U. Panizza. Public Debt around the World: A New Data Set of Central Government Debt. Applied Economics Letters, 2010, (1): 19–24.

    [27] Reinhart, C., and K. Rogoff. From Fiscal Crash to Debt Crisis. American Economic Review, 2011, (5): 1676–1706.

    [28] Wang, X., Xie, X. & Yang, B. Economic Review (经济评论), (2): 16–27 (2014).

    [29] Yuan, F. Economic Research Journal (经济研究), (3): 127–140 (2012).

    [30] Baumol, W. Macroeconomics of Unbalanced Growth: The Anatomy of Urban Crisis. American Economics Review, 1967, 57(3): 415–426.

    [31] Wang, X. Historical Research (历史研究), (6): 130–146 (2014).

    [32] Mao, J., Guan, H. & Lin, Z. Economic Research Journal (经济研究), (7): 87–101 (2015).

    [33] Wei, S., Chen, Y. & Lu, S. China Industrial Economics (中国工业经济), (8): 58–75 (2016).

    [34] Zheng, B. Chinese Journal of Population Science (中国人口科学), (5): 2–15 (2011).

    [35] Li, M. Chinese Review of Financial Studies (金融评论), (2): 57–73 (2015).

    [36] Wen, J. Exploration and Free Views (探索与争鸣), (1): 57–60 (2013).

    [37] Wei, H. China Industrial Economics (中国工业经济), (3): 18–30 (2014).

This Article

ISSN:1006-480X

CN: 11-3536/F

Vol , No. 10, Pages 40-56

October 2016

Downloads:0

Share
Article Outline

Abstract

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Typical facts and propositions to be tested
  • 3 Measurement methods and data
  • 4 Analysis on the empirical results
  • 5 Conclusions and suggestions
  • Footnote

    References