Research on separated development of virtual and real economy : evidences from listed companies in China during 2006–2013

WEN Chunhui1,2 REN Guoliang3

(1.School of Finance, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai, China 200433)
(2.College of Economics, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China 410128)
(3.Research Institute of China United Insurance Holding Co. Ltd., Beijing, China 100032)

【Abstract】Based on a two-stage dynamic game model of ultimate controlling shareholders, mid- and small-cap shareholders and management, this paper analyzes the different economic effects the degree of separation of two rights (ownership and control (management) right) caused by pyramidal ownership structure has on two types of agent cost and corporate values, exploring from microscopic perspective the mechanism of separated development of virtual economy and real economy caused by the ultimate control of listed companies. This paper undertakes empirical tests using the panel data of listed companies in China during 2006–2013. The research results show: the degree of separation of separation of two rights has an inhibitory effect on the private benefit of management, a promotive effect on the private benefit of control and an erosive effect on corporate value; because of the differences the ultimate controllers of the listed companies have of the two agent costs and separation of two rights under pyramidal ownership structure, the phenomenon of a higher agent cost level of companies controlled by virtual ultimate controllers than those controlled by real ultimate controllers occurs, and the degree of separation of two rights caused by the pyramidal ownership structure of virtual ultimate controllers leads to a higher inhibitory effect on the private benefit of management, a higher promotive effect of the private benefit of control and a higher erosive effect of corporate value than those of the listed companies controlled by real ultimate controllers. In addition, based on the perspective of division of work of listed companies’ ultimate control, the paper explores the reasons for the separated development of virtual economy and real economy in China.

【Keywords】 virtual economy; real economy; pyramidal shareholding; private benefit of control right; separation of two rights;

【DOI】

【Funds】 the Youth Project of National Social Sciences Fund Youth Project (13CJY008) the General Project of Human Province Social Sciences (15YBA206)

Download this article

(Translated by LAN yuanqin)

    Footnote

    [1]. ①Here, α measures the marginal earnings of participants grabbing private benefit of control. One can also regard the value added of utility of insider’s private benefit grabbing as α. [^Back]

    References

    〔1〕Ye, X. & Yan, Z. Social Sciences in China (中国社会科学), (9): 63–81 (2012).

    〔2〕La Porta R., Lopez-De-Silanes F., and Shleifer A.Corporate Ownership around the World [J]. The Journal of Finance, 1999, 54(2): 471–517.

    〔3〕Ma, L. & Xu, X. Reviews on Several Important Theoretical Issues about Company Governance(公司治理若干重大理论问题述评). Beijing: Economic Science Press, (2008).

    〔4〕Liu, S., Sun, P. & Liu, N. Economic Research Journal (经济研究), (4): 51–62 (2003).

    〔5〕Michael. Financial Innovation and Financial Fragility [J]. Journal of Economic Issues, 1989, 23(3): 779–793.

    〔6〕Jensen, and Meckling. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behaviour,Agency Costs and Capital Structure [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976, (3): 305–360.

    〔7〕Wei, G. Economic Research Journal (经济研究), (3): 32–39 (2000).

    〔8〕Xia, J. & Zhang, Y. Economic Research Journal (经济研究), (3): 87–98 (2008).

    〔9〕Harold Demsetz, and Kenneth Lehn. The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and Consequences [J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1985, 93(6): 1155–1177.

    〔10〕Pei, X. Journal of Hebei University of Economics andBusiness (河北经贸大学学报), (3): 1–6 (2005).

    〔11〕Lv, C. & Zhao, Y. Management World (管理世界), (11): 99–109 (2008).

    〔12〕Gao, L., He, S. & Huang, Z. China Economic Quarterly (经济学(季刊)), (4): 1157–1178 (2006).

    〔13〕Firth, M., Fung,P. M. Y., and Rui, O. M. Corporate Performance and CEO Compensation in China [J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2006, 12(4): 693–714.

    〔14〕Quan, X., Wu S. & Wen, F. Economic Research Journal (经济研究), (11): 73–86 (2010).

    〔15〕Luo, W., Zhang, Y., and Zhu, N. Bank Ownership and Executive Perquisites: New Evidence from an Emerging Market [J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2011, 17(2): 352–370.

    〔16〕Feng, X. China Economic Quarterly (经济学(季刊)), (3): 943–968 (2012).

    〔17〕Jiang, R. & Liu X. Economic Research Journal (经济研究), (10): 133–143 (2010).

    〔18〕Hao, Y & Ren, G. Collected Essays on Finance and Economics(财经论丛), (4): 87–92 (2010).

    〔19〕Liu, Y., Ren, G. & Wen, C. Journal of Zhengzhou University(郑州大学学报), (2): 68–74 (2014).

    〔20〕Liu, J. & Wu, C. Economic Research Journal (经济研究), (4): 60–69 (2004).

    〔21〕Zhou, X. & Chen, Q. Forum of World Economics & Politics (世界经济与政治论坛), (6): 140–152 (2013).

    〔22〕Wen, C. & Sun, L. Chinese Social Sciences Today (中国社会科学报), (2013–09–02).

    〔23〕Wang, Y., Liang, H. & Qin, Y. Forum of World Economics & Politics (世界经济与政治论坛), (6): 66–83 (2014).

    〔24〕Najah Attig, K. P. Fischer, Yoser Gadhoum. On the Determinants of Pyramidal Ownership: Evidence on Dilution of Minority Interests [R]. EFA Maastricht Meetings Paper, 2004.

    〔25〕Zuo, P. Forum of World Economics & Politics (世界经济与政治论坛), (3): 118–124 (2013).

This Article

ISSN:1006-480X

CN: 11-3536/F

Vol , No. 12, Pages 115-129

December 2015

Downloads:0

Share
Article Outline

Abstract

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Microscopic mechanism of the separated development of virtual and real economies
  • 3 Theoretical analysis and hypothesis proposal
  • 4 Empirical research design
  • 5 Empirical results and analysis
  • 6 Further discussions
  • 7 Major conclusion
  • Footnote

    References