Strategic uncertainty in the background of adjustment of US Grand Strategy: Trump’s DPRK policy and evolution of Peninsular security
【Abstract】Since taking over the presidency, Donald Trump has replaced Mr. Obama’s DPRK Policy of “strategic patience” with “maximum pressure and engagement.” In the last two years, Trump Government has applied policies including military threats, economic sanctions, diplomatic persuasion and verbal aggression, which highly influenced the development of security situation of Korean Peninsula. Trump’s adjustment of DPRK policy, including the threat of war or the historical meeting with DPRK leader, originates from a simplified consideration by utilizing “strategic uncertainty.” Trump’s policy could be viewed as a part of the US Grand Strategy of dealing with competition of great powers, especially China. Trump’s policy could not decisively change the status quo of Korean Peninsula or even resolve the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, and the Peninsula’s security situation will go back to multilateral diplomatic wrangling. China should deeply analyze the logic and core of US policy to China, DPRK and the Peninsula and after that reset the priority of China’s strategic aims in related issues in order to stabilize the Peninsula security.
【Keywords】 the US; DPRK; the nuclear issue on the Korean Peninsula; strategic uncertainty; security;
(Translated by LI Mengling)
. ① They are Resolution 2356 adopted on June 2, Resolution 2371 adopted on August 5, Resolution 2375 adopted on September 11 and Resolution 2397 adopted on December 22 respectively. [^Back]
 Carl Von Clausewitz. On War. trans.by Michael Howard and Peter Paret. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007: 14.
 Leif-Eric Easley. From Strategic Patience to Strategic Uncertainty: Trump, North Korea, and South Korea’s New President. World Affairs, 2017 (2): 7–9.
 Art, R. A Grand Strategy for America. Guo, S. (trans.) Beijing: Peking University Press, 59–61 (2014).
 Posen, B. Restraint: A New Foundation for U.S. Grand Strategy. Qu, D. (trans.) Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press (China), 122 (2016).
 Niv Farago. Washington’s Failure to Resolve the North Korean Nuclear Conundrum: Examining Two Decades of US Policy. International Affairs, 2016 (5): 1128–1134.
 The White House. National Security Strategy of the United States of America(2002).Washington D.C.: The White House, 2002: 14.
 Evans J. R. Revere. Tough Challenges, Hard Choices: Dealing with North Korea after the Collapse of the Leap Day Agreement. American Foreign Policy Interests, 2012 (4): 171–172.
 The White House. National Security Strategy of the United States of America (2017). Washington D.C.: The White House, 2017: 1–25.
 https://www. washingtonpost. com/politics/trump-tweets-news-report-citing-anonymous-sources-on-n-korea-movements/2017/08/08/47a9b9c0-7c48-11e7-83c7-5bd5460f0d7e_story.html?utm_term=.ec4cf20c6a40
 Victor Cha and Katrin Fraser Katz. The Right Way to Coerce North Korea: Ending the Threat without Going to War. Foreign Affairs, 2018 (3): 87–88.
 Ge, H. Journal of International Security Studies (国际安全研究), (3): 89–94 (2018).
 Juergen Kleiner. The Bush Administration and the Nuclear Challenges by North Korea. Diplomacy and Statecraft, 2005 (2): 206–371.
 Barry R. Posen. The Rise of Illiberal Hegemony: Trump’s Surprising Grand Strategy. Foreign Affairs, 2018 (2): 20.
 Department of Korean history, Korea University. 新编韩国史. Sun, K. (trans.) Jinan: Shandong University Press, 191 (2010).
 Patrick McEachern, and Jaclyn O’Brien McEachern. North Korea, Iran, and the Challenge to International. Order: A Comparative Perspective. London & New York: Routledge, 2018: 103–139.
 Robert Jervis, and Mira Rapp-Hooper. Perception and Misperception on the Korean Peninsula: How Unwanted Wars Begin. Foreign Affairs, 2018 (3): 104.
 Ge, H. Peace and Development (和平与发展), (5): 46–47 (2017).