State autonomy and the future of Korean Peninsula

LIU Xuelian1,2 MENG Xiangchen1

(1.Department of Political Science in School of Public Administration at Jilin University)
(2.Institute of Northeast Asia Geo-politics and Geo-economics of Jilin University)

【Abstract】The situation in Northeast Asia has attracted worldwide attention because of the fourth and fifth nuclear tests conducted by the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) and the deployment of “Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD)” by the Republic of Korea (ROK) and the US on the Korean Peninsula. Scholars have launched a new discussion on how to deal with these crises brought about by these changes. Based on an analytic framework of the relationship between the theory of state autonomy and the state’s decision making behavior, this paper attempts to analyze the behavioral logic of the two countries on the Korean Peninsula in terms of the choice of foreign policy, pointing out that the main factors influencing the decision-making process of DPRK and ROK are domestic politics and the strategy of great powers. And this paper proposes two policy recommendations, one of which is rejuvenation of the economy of DPRK and the other a change for ROK from the “balancer” to “coordinator.” A prosperous and peaceful future of the Korean Peninsula and Northeast Asia can be ensured only by weakening the policy orientation of “power politics” and emphasizing and focusing on governance and economic growth in policy formulations and implementations.

【Keywords】 Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK); Republic of Korea (ROK); state autonomy; DPRK nuclear issue; economic DPRK; coordinator;

【DOI】

【Funds】 Key Project of National Social Science Foundation of China (13AZZ014)

Download this article

    References

    [1] Shao, Y. 地缘环境的挑战与应战. Shanghai: Shanghai Guji Press, 2 (2005).

    [2] Myung Hyun Cho, Korea and the Major Power: An Analysis of Power Structures in East Asia, Seoul: The Research Center for Peace and Unification of Korea, 1989, p. v. quoted from Chen, F. & Wang, J. Asia-Pacific Major Powers and Korean Peninsula (亚太大国与朝鲜半岛). Beijing: Peking University Press, 19 (2002).

    [3] Han, X. The Security Structure of Korean Peninsula (朝鲜半岛的安全结构). Beijing: China Social Sciences Press, 127 (2009).

    [4] Liu, X. & Xing, S. Northeast Asia Forum (东北亚论坛), (3) (2013).

    [5] Wang, L. Contemporary International Relations (现代国际关系), (1) (2009).

    [6] Cheng, X. Foreign Affairs Review (外交评论), (4) (2016); Qiu, F. Historical Research on DPRK and ROK (朝鲜韩国历史研究), (15) (2014).

    [7] Wang, S. & Ling, S. Northeast Asia Forum (东北亚论坛), (3) (2016).

    [8] Xu, N. & Huang, F. Northeast Asia Forum (东北亚论坛), (5) (2014); Yang, Y. Foreign AffairsReview (外交评论), (4) (2015).

    [9] Fan, J. The Chinese Journal of American Studies (美国研究), (4) (2014); Guo, Y. Russian, East European & Central Asian Studies (俄罗斯东欧中亚研究), (2) (2013); Wang, X. & Wang, Y. Contemporary Korea (当代韩国), (2) (2015); Cui, G. Asia-Pacific Security and Maritime Affairs (亚非纵横), (5) (2014).

    [10] [America] Evans, Rueschemeyer, Skocpol, et al. Bringing the State Back In (找回国家). Fang, L., Mo, Y., Huang, Q., et al. (trans.) Shanghai: SDX Joint Publishing Company, 10 (2009).

    [11] Zhu, L. The Journal of Yunnan Administration College (云南行政学院学报), (6) (2003).

    [12] Guo, J. The Journal of Shanghai Administration Institute (上海行政学院学报), (3) (2013).

    [13] Chen, Y. 超国家治理—国际关系转型研究. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House, 171 (2009).

    [14] [America] Hans J. Morgenthau, Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (国家间政治——寻求权力与和平的斗争). Xu, X., Hao, W., Li, B., et al. (trans.) Beijing: Chinese People’s Public Security University Press, 231–232 (1990).

    [15] [Japan] Kim Kwang-ok, 三国人性格. Beijing: China Friendship Publishing Company, 46–47 (2010).

    [16] Jin, X. Journal of Yanbian University (Social Sciences) (延边大学学报(社会科学版)), (5) (2015).

    [17] [America] James N. Rosenau, Governance without Government (没有政府的治理). Zhang, S. & Liu, X. (trans.) Nanchang: Jiangxi People’s Publishing House, 67 (2001).

    [18] Over 50% Public Opinion in ROK Support Park Geun-hye for THAAD Deployment, http://www.jiemian.com/paper/797461.html

    [19] [ROK] Jo Seong-yeol, International Studies (国际问题研究), 109-155 (2003), quoted from Han, X. TheSecurity Structure of Korean Peninsula (朝鲜半岛的安全结构). Beijing: China Social Sciences Press, 126 (2009).

    [20] Liu, X. Northeast Asia Forum (东北亚论坛), (4) (2010).

    [21] http://news.xinhuanet.com/banyt/2005-06/08/content_3059618.htm

    [22] [America] Brzezinski, The Grand Chessboard (大棋局). China Institute of International Studies (trans.), Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House, 35 (2007).

    [23] Ding, G. Contemporary International Relations (现代国际关系), (10) (2011).

    [24] Ling, S. Contemporary Korea (当代韩国), (1) (2015).

This Article

ISSN:1003-7411

CN: 22-1180/C

Vol 26, No. 01, Pages 90-99+128

January 2017

Downloads:4

Share
Article Outline

Abstract

  • 1 Situation on Korean Peninsula and academic thinking
  • 2 State autonomy and state decision-making behavior
  • 3 The logic of diplomatic behavior of the two countries on the Korean Peninsula in the view of state autonomy
  • 4 Solution to the DPRK’s nuclear issue in the view of state autonomy
  • References