Side-by-side Chinese-English

北京植物物候的季节动态特征——以北京植物园为例

邢小艺1,2 郝培尧1,2 李冠衡1,2 李慧1,2 董丽1,2

(1.北京林业大学园林学院, 北京 100083)
(2.城乡生态环境北京实验室, 北京 100083)

【摘要】季节性是北京植物景观的典型特征, 而个体物候是植物景观季节动态的基础。该研究基于北京植物园内120种落叶树种的周年物候数据, 对北京植物景观的物候季节动态进行分析。物候观测以中国物候观测法为标准, 采用a、b、c三级物候代码进行物候记录;数据分析以二十四节气中的候 (5日) 为基本时间变量, 基于频率分布型法探究北京物候季节划分及其物候构成动态, 基于SPSS 20.0频数分布统计等探究各类物候现象发生期及持续期的时间分布特征等。物候季节划分及物候构成特征结果为:6–19候为春, 物候期发生频数占全年总量的54.03%, 以发芽、展叶、开花为主要物候特征, 后期有少数树种结果;20–45候为夏, 物候量占全年的12.95%, 此期全部观测树种完成展叶, 春花树种进入结果期, 并有较少夏花开放及秋色叶出现;46–59候为秋, 物候量占全年的27.19%, 以秋色叶及落叶物候为主并伴有较少结果和开花物候发生;60候至次年春季起始前为冬, 其中60–72候物候量仅占全年的0.6%, 全为落叶物候。各类物候期的时间分布特征如下:展叶物候期分布于3–23候, 华北珍珠梅 (Sorbaria kirilowii) 、旱柳 (Salix matsudana) 等展叶最早, 展叶期平均持续3.27候。秋色物候期分布于40–63候, 49–56候为最佳观赏期, 蒙椴 (Tilia mongolica) 、山杏 (Armeniaca sibirica) 等最早显秋色;秋色期平均持续8.2候, 卫矛 (Euonymus alatus) 、接骨木 (Sambucus williamsii) 等秋色期较长。叶幕期平均持续44.2候, 糯米条 (Abelia chinensis) 、旱柳、棣棠 (Kerria japonica) 等叶幕期最长。花物候期分布于1–53候, 始花期为1–41候, 盛花期平均发生于始花后1.81候, 8–23候为集中观赏期, 蜡梅 (Chimonanthus praecox) 、迎春 (Jasminum nudiflorum) 、榆 (Ulmus pumila) 、毛白杨 (Populus tomentosa) 等开花最早, 木香薷 (Elsholtzia stauntoni) 开花最晚;花期平均持续6.7候, 华北珍珠梅、木槿 (Hibiscus syriacus) 、紫薇 (Lagerstroemia indica) 等夏秋开花树种花期最长。果物候期分布于8–59候, 榆、郁香忍冬 (Lonicera fragrantissima) 等果实成熟最早;持果期平均持续29.0候, 果实宿存树种及黑果荚蒾 (Viburnum melanocarpum) 、‘金叶’风箱果 (Physocarpus opulifolius‘Luteus’) 等具有较长的果实观赏期。与20世纪80年代同类研究结果对比分析, 北京2017年的物候季节与30年前相比, 入春提早1候, 夏季延长4候, 入秋延后3候, 秋季缩短2候, 且不同季节持续期长短的差距加大。

【关键词】 植物物候;季节划分;物候动态特征;

【DOI】

Seasonal dynamic of plant phenophases in Beijing—A case study in Beijing Botanical Garden

XING Xiao-Yi1,2 HAO Pei-Yao1,2 LI Guan-Heng1,2 LI Hui1,2 DONG Li1,2

(1.School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China 100083)
(2.Beijing Laboratory of Urban and Rural Ecological Environment, Beijing, China 100083)

【Abstract】 Aims Seasonality is the typical characteristic of plant landscape in Beijing, including seasonal dynamics of plant phenology. We analyzed the seasonal changes in phenology of 120 deciduous trees in Beijing Botanical Garden, with additional efforts on an innovative methodology in studying plant phenology. Methods Based on the standards of the Chinese Phenological Observation Method, three-level Phenological Code (a, b, and c) was used to recode the phenology data. Our data analysis was performed with “pentad” (5-day period) in 24 Solar Terms. The analytical methods include a frequency distribution method were employed to explore the division of phenophases and their dynamic constitution. The frequency distribution statistics in SPSS 20.0 were applied to explore the temporal dynamics in occurrence time and duration for different types of phenophases. Important findings The division of phenological seasons and their phenological constitution: the 6th–19th pentad for Spring, with 54.03% of the whole phenophases that are featured with sprouting, leaf spreading and flowering; the 20th–45th pentad for Summer, with 12.95% of phenophases that include complete leaf spreading for all trees, intensive fruiting, few flowering, and autumn-leaf scenery in late summer; 46th–59th pentad for Autumn, with 27.19% of the phenophases that are characterized with leaf discoloration and defoliation, some fruiting, and very few flowering; and the 60th pentad for Winter, with 0.6% of phenophases that are all constituted with defoliation. The temporal distribution patterns of different kinds of phenophases are as follows. The leaf development phenophases span from the 3rd to 23rd pentad and averagely last for 3.27 pentads, with Sorbaria kirilowii as one of the earliest leaf-unfolding species. The leaf coloration phenophases happen between the 40th and 63rd pentad, with Tilia mongolica and Armeniaca sibirica as the earliest species to show fall-color leaf. The autumn-leaf duration lasts for 8.2 pentads in average, with Euonymus alatus and Sambucus williamsii as the typical species that show longer leaf duration. The leaf period averagely lasts for 44.2 pentads, with Abelia chinensis, Salix matsudana, and Kerria japonica holding the longest leaf time. The flowering phenophases happen during the 1st–53rd pentad, with the 8th–23rd pentad as the best ornamental period, and three species (Chimonanthus praecox, Jasminum nudiflorum, and Ulmus pumila) as the earliest blooming species and Elsholtzia stauntoni as the last one to bloom. The flowering period lasts for 6.7 pentads in average, with Sorbaria kirilowii, Hibiscus syriacus, and Lagerstroemia indica showing the longest flowering time. The fruiting phenophases happen between the 8th and 59th pentad, with U. pumila and Lonicera fragrantissima as the earliest species for fruit maturation. The fruiting duration averagely lasts for 29.0 pentads, and those species that do not lose fruits during the winter and some other species with longer fruit holding period though falling fruits completely in winter such as Viburnum melanocarpum and Physocarpus opulifolius ‘Luteus’ have longer ornamental time of fruit scenery. Compared with a counterpart research in the 1980s, this study revealed that the spring in 2017 came earlier by a pentad than that 30 years ago while autumn came later by 3 pentads. Additionally, the autumn duration shortened by 2 pentads while the summer duration prolonged by 4 pentads, resulting in larger differences in the duration among the four seasons.

【Keywords】 plant phenology; seasonal division; phenological dynamics;

【DOI】

Download this article
    References

    Chen XQ, Cao ZP (1999). Frequency distribution pattern of plant phenophases and its application to season determination. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 19 (1), 21–27 (in Chinese).

    Chen XQ, Zhang WQ, Ren SL, Lang WG, Liang BY, Liu GH (2017). Temporal coherence of phenological and climatic rhythmicity in Beijing. International Journal of Biometeorology, 61, 1733–1748.

    Cornelius C, Petermeier H, Estrella N (2011). A comparison of methods to estimate seasonal phenological development from BBCH scale recording. International Journal of Biometeorology, 55, 867–877.

    Ge QS, Dai JH, Zheng JY, Bai J, Zhong SY, Wang HJ, Wang WC (2011). Advances in first bloom dates and increased occurrences of yearly second blooms in eastern China since the 1960s: Further phenological evidence of climate warming. Ecological Research, 26, 713–723.

    Liang L, Schwartz MD (2014). Testing a growth efficiency hypothesis with continental-scale phenological variations of common and cloned plants. International Journal of Biometeorology, 58, 1789–1797.

    Meier U (2001). Growth Stages of Mono- and Dicotyledonous Plants—BBCH Monograph. 2nd edn. Federal Biological Research Center for Agriculture and Forestry, Berlin.

    Schwartz MD (2013). Phenology: An Integrative Environmental Science. Springer, New York.

    Schwartz MD, Ahas R, Aasa A (2006). Onset of spring starting earlier across the northern hemisphere. Global Change Biology, 12, 343–351.

    Shutova E, Wielgolaski FE, Karles SR, Makarova O, Berlina N, Filimonova T, Haraldsson E, Aspholm PE, FløL, Høgda KA (2006). Growing seasons of Nordic mountain birch in northernmost Europe as indicated by long-term field studies and analyses of satellite images. International Journal of Biometeorology, 51, 155–166.

    Wan MW, Liu XZ (1979). Chinese Phenological Observation Method. Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese).

    Wu D, Zhao LY (2014). The discussion on landscape phenology of landscape plants. Journal of Agriculture, 4 (11), 66–68 (in Chinese).

    Xu H, Wang XM (2004). Phenological characteristics of the main trees and their effects on the landscape features in Lianhuashan Park, Shenzhen. Journal of South China Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition), 25 (2), 80–84 (in Chinese).

    Yang GD, Chen XQ (1995). The Phenological Calendar and Its Application in Beijing Area. Capital Normal University Press, Beijing (in Chinese).

    Yang GD, Chen XQ (2000). Classification of phenophase combination of wood plants—A case study of cultivated plants in the Beijing Botanical Garden. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 36 (2), 39–46 (in Chinese).

    Yao YZ (1991). Garden Plants and Their Landscape. Agriculture Press, Beijing (in Chinese).

    Zhao XL, Shi CY, He B, Ran WR, Cai YL (2013). Spring phenological characteristics and phenophase classification of landscape greening tree species in Chongming Island of Shanghai. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 32, 2275–2280 (in Chinese).

    Zhong SY, Ge QS, Zheng JY (2012). Changes of main phenophases of natural calendar and phenological seasons in Beijing for the last 30 years. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 36, 1217–1225 (in Chinese).

    Zhu KZ, Wan MW (1963). Phenology. Science Popularization Press, Beijing (in Chinese).

This Article

ISSN:1005-264X

CN:11-3397/Q

Vol 42, No. 09, Pages 906-916

September 2018

Downloads:0

Share
Article Outline

Abstract

  • 1 Study area and methods
  • 2 Results
  • 3 Discussion
  • References