Environmental DNA (eDNA)-metabarcoding-based early monitoring and warning for invasive species in aquatic ecosystems

LI Hanxi 1,2 HUANG Xuena 1 LI Shiguo 1,2 ZHAN Aibin 1,2

(1.Key Laboratory of Environmental Biotechnology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085)
(2.College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049)

【Abstract】Biological invasion is a major threat to multiple ecosystems across the globe, causing severe damage to ecological integrity, loss of biodiversity, economic and social development and even human health. With the rapid development in aquaculture, shipping and aquarium and ornamental trades in the past several decades, China has become one of the countries most influenced by invasive species. Studies have clearly shown that the development and application of robust early monitoring and warning is one of the most effective ways to prevent and possibly control invasive species in aquatic ecosystems. Compared with terrestrial ecosystems, there remain several technical difficulties for developing early monitoring and warning in aquatic habitats. The technical challenges are mainly due to several features of aquatic biological communities such as high biodiversity and complex structure, a large number of microscopic species, extremely low population density and lack of available taxonomic keys for species identification. With the rapid development of high-throughput sequencing techniques, the environmental DNA (eDNA)-metabarcoding has become the top priority method for developing the early monitoring and warning programs in aquatic ecosystems. In this review, we aim to synthesize the research progress on eDNA-metabarcoding and its application to early monitoring and warning of invasive species in aquatic ecosystems. In addition, we briefly discuss the technological advantages of eDNA-metabarcoding for the early monitoring and warning programs. Finally, we propose research perspectives for solutions to technical issues for false positive and false negative errors in the eDNA-metabarcoding process.

【Keywords】 biological invasion; DNA metabarcoding; biodiversity; aquatic ecosystems; early monitoring and warning; type I error; type II error;

【Funds】 National Natural Science Foundation of China (31622011)

Download this article

(Translated by ZHAO B)


    [1]. (1) MA Zhuxin (2016) Distribution of invasive crayfish Procambarus clarkii in Yuanyang terrace revealed by eDNA. Master Thesis, Yunnan University, Kunming (in Chinese with English abstract).

    [2]. (1) ZHANG Wanwan (2017) Study on biodiversity monitoring of phytoplankton community based on DNA barcoding technology. Master Thesis, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China (in Chinese with English abstract).


    Avó AP, Daniell TJ, Neilson R, Oliveira S, Branco J, Adão H (2017) DNA barcoding and morphological identification of benthic nematodes assemblages of estuarine intertidal sediments: Advances in molecular tools for biodiversity assessment. Frontiers in Marine Science, 4, 66.

    Bellemain E, Carlsen T, Brochmann C, Coissac E, Taberlet P, Kauserud H (2010) ITS as an environmental DNA barcode for fungi: An in silico approach reveals potential PCR biases. BMC Microbiology, 10, 189.

    Brannock PM, Ortmann AC, Moss AG, Halanych KM (2016) Metabarcoding reveals environmental factors influencing spatiotemporal variation in pelagic microeukaryotes. Molecular Ecology, 25, 3593–3604.

    Bråte J, Logares R, Berney C, Ree DK, Klaveness D, Jakobsen KS, Tabrizi KS (2010) Freshwater Perkinsea and marinefreshwater colonizations revealed by pyrosequencing and phylogeny of environmental rDNA. The ISME Journal, 4, 1144–1153.

    Briski E, Cristescu ME, Bailey SA, MacIsaac HJ (2011) Use of DNA barcoding to detect invertebrate invasive species from diapausing eggs. Biological Invasions, 13, 1325–1340.

    Boessenkool S, Epp LS, Haile J, Bellemain E (2012) Blocking human contaminant DNA during PCR allows amplification of rare mammal species from sedimentary ancient DNA. Molecular Ecology, 21, 1806–1815.

    Bourlat SJ, Borja A, Gilbert J, Taylor MI, Davies N, Weisberg SB, Griffith JF, Lettieri J, Field D, Benzie J, Glpckner FO, Rodríguez-Ezpeleta N, Faith DP, Bean TP, Obst M (2013) Genomics in marine monitoring: New opportunities for assessing marine health status. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 74, 19–31.

    Bucklin A, Ortman BD, Jennings RM, Nigro LM, Sweetman CJ, Copley NJ, Suttonb T, Wiebec PH (2010) A “Rosetta Stone” for metazoan zooplankton: DNA barcode analysis of species diversity of the Sargasso Sea (Northwest Atlantic Ocean). Deep-Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 57, 2234–2247.

    Carlsen T, Aas AB, Lindner D, Vrålstad T, Chumacher T, Kauserud H (2012) Don’t make a mistake: Is tag switching an overlooked source of error in amplicon Pyrosequencing studies? Fungal Ecology, 5, 747–749.

    Chen L, Wu L, Liu Y, Xu HG (2016) Application of environmental DNA metabarcoding in ecology. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 36, 4573–4582 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Chen Y, Sun C, Zhan A (2017) Biological invasions in aquatic ecosystems in China. Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management, 10, 402–412.

    Chen YY, Gao YC, Peng H, Xiong W, Li SG, Zhan AB (2018) Community structure of benthic macroinvertebrates and water quality assessment in the Songhua River. Journal of Biosafety, 27 (2), 95–104 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Cheung MK, Au CH, Chu KH (2010) Composition and genetic diversity of picoeukaryotes in subtropical coastal waters as revealed by 454 Pyrosequencing. The ISME Journal, 4, 1053–1059.

    Darling JA, Mahon AR (2011) From molecules to management: Adopting DNA-based methods for monitoring biological invasions in aquatic environments. Environmental Research, 111, 978–988.

    Davey ML, Kauserud H, Ohlson M (2014) Forestry impacts on the hidden fungal biodiversity associated with bryophytes. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 90, 313–325.

    Deagle BE, Jarman SN, Coissac E, Pompanon F, Taberlet P (2014) DNA metabarcoding and the cytochrome C oxidase subunit I marker: Not a perfect match. Biology Letters, 10, 20140562.

    Dudgeon D, Arthington AH, Gessner MO (2006) Freshwater biodiversity: Importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biological Reviews, 81, 163–182.

    Emily AB, Frederic JJ, Zhan A, Hugh JM, Melania EC (2016) Detection of aquatic invaders using metabarcoding reveals a high number of non-indigenous species in Canadian ports. Diversity and Distributions, 22, 1045–1059.

    Egan SP, Grey E, Olds B (2015) Rapid molecular detection of invasive species in ballast and harbor water by integrating environmental DNA and light transmission sectroscopy. Environmental Science & Technology, 49, 4113–4121.

    Elbrecht V, Taberlet P, Dejean T, Valentini A, UsseglioPolatera P, Beisel JN, Coissac E, Boyer F, Leese F (2016) Testing the potential of a ribosomal 16S marker for DNA metabarcoding of insects. PeerJ, 4, e1966.

    Engelbrektson A, Kunin V, Wrighton K, Zvenigorodsky N, Chen F, Ochman H, Hugenholtz P (2010) Experimental factors affecting PCR-based estimates of microbial species richness and evenness. The ISME Journal, 4, 642–647.

    Ficetola GF, Miaud C, Pompanon F, Taberlet P (2008) Species detection using environmental DNA from water samples. Biology Letters, 4, 423–425.

    Ficetola GF, Pansu J, Bonin A, Coissac E, Giguet-Covex C, De Barba M, Gielly L, Lopes CM, Boyer F, Pompanon F, Rayé G, Taberlet P (2015) Replication levels, false presences and the estimation of the presence/absence from eDNA metabarcoding data. Molecular Ecology Resources, 15, 543–556.

    Galand PE, Casamayor EO, Kirchman DL (2009) Unique archaeal assemblages in the Arctic Ocean unveiled by massively parallel tag sequencing. The ISME Journal, 3, 860–869.

    Goldberg CS, Sepulveda A, Ray A, Baumgardt J, Waits LP (2013) Environmental DNA as a new method for early detection of New Zealand mudsnails (Potamopyrgus antipodarum). Freshwater Science, 32, 792–800.

    Hao YB, Zhang AJ, Liu JD, Gu ZM (2018) Application of environmental DNA technology in the study of fish resources. Biotechnology Bulletin, 34 (12), 56–62 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Hajibabaei M, Shokralla S, Zhou X (2011) Environmental barcoding: A next-generation sequencing approach for biomonitoring applications using river benthos. PLoS ONE, 6, e17497.

    Hambler C, Henderson PA, Speight MR (2011) Extinction rates, extinction-prone habitats, and indicator groups in Britain and at larger scales. Biological Conservation, 144, 713–721.

    Holland RA, Darwall WRT, Smith KG (2012) Conservation priorities for freshwater biodiversity: The key biodiversity area approach refined and tested for continental Africa. Biological Conservation, 148, 167–179.

    Jerde CL, Mahon AR, Chadderton WL, Lodge DM (2011) ‘‘Sight-unseen’’ detection of rare aquatic species using environmental DNA. Conservation Letters, 4, 150–157.

    Jiang W, Wang QJ, Deng J (2016) Protocol optimization of eDNA analysis workflow for detecting Hucho bleekeri. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 27, 2372–2378 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Ju RT, Li H, Shih CJ, Li B (2012) Progress of biological invasions research in China over the last decade. Biodiversity Science, 20, 581–611 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Kanagawa T (2003) Bias and artifacts in multitemplate polymerase chain reactions (PCR). Journal of Bioscience and Bioengieering, 96, 317–323.

    Kauserud H, Kumar S, Brysting AK, Norden J, Carlsen T (2012) High consistency between replicate 454 Pyrosequencing analyses of ectomycorrhizal plant root samples. Mycorrhiza, 22, 309–315.

    Kelly RP, Port JA, Yamahara KM, Crowder LB (2014) Using environmental DNA to census marine fishes in a large mesocosm. PLoS ONE, 9, e86175.

    Keskin E, Atar HH (2013) DNA barcoding commercially important fish species of Turkey. Molecular Ecology Resources, 13, 788–797.

    Kunin V, Engelbrektson A, Ochman H, Hugenholtz P (2010) Wrinkles in the rare biosphere: Pyrosequencing errors can lead to artificial inflation of diversity estimates. Environmental Microbiology, 12, 118–123.

    Lang DD, Tang M, Zhou X (2018) Qualitative and quantitative molecular construction of plant-pollinator network: Application and prospective. Biodiversity Science, 26, 445–456 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Leray M, Yang JY, Meyer CP, Mills SC, Agudelo N (2013) A new versatile primer set targeting a short fragment of the mitochondrial COI region for metabarcoding metazoan diversity: Application for characterizing coral reef fish gut contents. Frontiers in Zoology, 10, 34.

    Levy–Booth DJ, Campbell RG, Gulden RH, Hart MM, Powell JR (2007) Cycling of extracellular DNA in the soil environment. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 39, 2977–2991.

    Li FL, Yang JH, Yang YN, Zhang XW (2018) Using environmental DNA metabarcoding to monitor the changes and health status of aquatic ecosystems. Environmental Monitoring in China, 34 (6), 37–46 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Li Q, Wu JG, Kou XJ (2013) Applications of camera trap in wildlife population ecology. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 24, 947–955 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Lin Y, Gao Z, Zhan A (2015) Introduction and use of non-native species for aquaculture in China: Status, risks and management solutions. Reviews Aquaculture, 7, 28–58.

    Liu FM, Miu JL, Zheng Z, Wang YB (2007) Present situation, hazards and prevention and control measures of marine invasive alien species into China. Coastal Engineering, 26 (4), 49–57 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Lockwood JL, Hoopes MF, Marchetti MP (2013) Invasion Ecology, 2nd edn. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Chichester, West Sussex.

    MacKenzie DIM, Nichols JD, Lachman GB, Droege S, Royle JA, Langtimm CA (2002) Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology, 83, 2248–2255.

    Ma HJ, Stewart K, Ma LM, Ren WW, Zhao JF (2016) Environmental DNA and its application in protecting aquatic ecosystem. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 35, 516–523 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    McDonald LL (2004) Sampling rare populations. In: Sampling Rare or Elusive Species: Concepts, Designs, and Techniques for Estimating Population Parameters (ed. Thompson WL), pp. 11–42. Island Press, New York.

    Odelberg SJ, Weiss RB, Hata A, White R (1995) Template switching during DNA synthesis by Therms aquaticus DNA polymerase. Nucleic Acids Research, 23, 2049–2057.

    Pagenkopp LKM, Fleischer RC, Carney KJ, Holzer KK, Ruiz GM (2016) Amplicon-based Pyrosequencing reveals high diversity of protistan parasites in ships’ ballast water: Implications for biogeography and infectious diseases. Microbiology Ecology, 71, 530–542.

    Pietramellara G (2009) Extracellular DNA in soil and sediment: Fate and ecological relevance. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 45, 219–235.

    Polz MF, Cavanaugh CM (1998) Bias in template-to-product ratios in multi-template PCR. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 64, 3724–3730.

    Prosser JI (2010) Replicate or lie. Environmental Microbiology, 12, 1806–1810.

    Pysek P, Richardson DM (2010) Invasive species, environmental change and management, and health. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35, 25–55.

    Rees HC, Maddison BC, Middleditch DJ (2014) The detection of aquatic animal species using environmental DNA: A review of e DNA as a survey tool in ecology. Journal of Applied Ecology, 51, 1450–1459.

    Saunders GW (2005) Applying DNA barcoding to red macroalgae: A preliminary appraisal holds promise for future applications. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 360, 1879–1888.

    Schmieder R, Edwards R (2011) Fast identification and removal of sequence contamination from genomic and metagenomic datasets. PLoS ONE, 6, e17288.

    Shan XJ, Li M, Wang WJ (2018) Application of environmental DNA technology in aquatic ecosystem. Progress in Fishery Sciences, 39 (3), 23–29 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Shi XL, Lepère C, Scanlan DJ, Vaulot D (2011) Plastid 16S rRNA gene diversity among eukaryotic picophytoplankton sorted by flow cytometry from the South Pacific Ocean. PLoS ONE, 6, e18979.

    Sogin ML, Morrison HG, Huber JA, Welch DM, Huse SM, Neal PR, Arrieta JM, Herndl GJ (2006) Microbial diversity in the deep sea and the underexplored “rare biosphere”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 103, 12115–12120.

    Song JW, Small MJ, Casman EA (2017) Making sense of the noise: The effect of hydrology on silver carp eDNA detection in the Chicago area waterway system. Science of the Total Environment, 605, 713–720.

    Sun C, Zhao Y, Li H, Dong Y, Mac Isaac HJ, Zhan A (2015) Unreliable quantitation of species abundance based on highthroughput sequencing data of zooplankton communities. Aquatic Biology, 24, 9–15.

    Suzuki MT, Giovannoni SJ (1996) Bias caused by template annealing in the amplification of mixtures of 16S rRNA genes by PCR. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 62, 625–630.

    Taberlet P, Coissac E, Hajibabaei M (2012) Environmental DNA. Molecular Ecology, 21, 1789–1793.

    Takahara T, Minamoto T, Yamanaka H, Doi H, Kawabata Z (2012) Estimation of fish biomass using environmental DNA. PLoS ONE, 7, e35868.

    Tang CQ, Leasi F, Obertegger U, Kieneke A, Barraclough TG, Fontaneto D (2012) The widely used small subunit 18S rDNA molecule greatly underestimates true diversity in biodiversity surveys of the meiofauna. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 109, 16208–16212.

    Tang M, Yi TS, Wang X, Tan MH, Zhou X (2013) The application of metabarcoding technology in identification of plant species diversity. Plant Diversity and Resources, 35, 769–773 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Tedersoo L, Nilsson RH, Abarenkov K, Jairus T, Sadam A, Saar I (2010) 454 Pyrosequencing and Sanger sequencing of tropical mycorrhizal fungi provide similar results but reveal substantial methodological biases. New Phytologist, 188, 291–301.

    Thomsen PF, Møller PR, Sigsgaard EE, Knudsen SW, Jørgensen OA, Willerslev E (2016) Environmental DNA from seawater samples correlate with trawl catches of Subarctic, deepwater fishes. PLoS ONE, 11, e0165252.

    Tréguier A, Paillisson J, Dejean T (2014) Environmental DNA surveillance for invertebrate species: Advantages and technical limitations to detect invasive crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) in freshwater ponds. Journal of Applied Ecology, 51, 871–879.

    Valentini A, Taberlet P, Miaud C, Civade R, Herder J, Thomsen PF, Bellemain E, Besnard A, Coissac E, Boyer F, Gaboriaud C, Jean P, Poulet N, Roset N, Copp GH, Geniez P, Pont D, Argillier C, Baudoin JM, Peroux T, Crivelli AJ, Olivier A, Acqueberge M, Le Brun M, Møller PR, Willerslev E, Dejean T (2016) Next-generation monitoring of aquatic biodiversity using environmental DNA metabarcoding. Molecular Ecology, 25, 929–942.

    Veach AM, Dodds WK, Jumpponen A (2015) Woody plant encroachment, and its removal, impact bacterial and fungal communities across stream and terrestrial habitats in a tallgrass prairie ecosystem. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 91, fiv109.

    Wan FH, Guo JY, Zhang F (2009) Research on Biological Invasions in China. Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese).

    Wan YQ, Guo WB, Wu J, Li L, Xu HG (2017) Site occupancy model: Principles and research progress. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 33, 673–679 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Wang ZH, Chen JF, Yang YF (2010) Control and management of harmful algal bloom species introduced by ballast water. Marine Environmental Science, 29, 920–922 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Weber AAT, Pawlowski J (2013) Can abundance of protists be inferred from sequence data: A case study of foraminifera. PLoS ONE, 8, e56739.

    Wu B, Zhao Q, Liu HM, Liu ZH, Sun XJ, Sun C, Zhou LQ, Yang AG (2018) Comparative analysis of different DNA barcoding methods for Veneroida classification and identification. Journal of Fishery Sciences of China, 25, 880–890 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Wu YS, Tang YK, Li JL, Liu K, Li HX, Wang Q, Yu JH, Xu P (2019) The application of environmental DNA in the monitoring of the Yangtze finless porpoise, Neophocaena phocaenoides asaeorientalis. Journal of Fishery Sciences of China, 26 (1), 126–134 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Xiong W, Li H, Zhan A (2016) Early detection of invasive species in marine ecosystems using high-throughput sequencing: Technical challenges and possible solutions. Marine Biology, 163, 139.

    Xu N, Chang JB (2016) Preliminary study on fish species detection in the middle and lower Yangtze River using environmental DNA. Journal of Hydroecology, 37 (5), 49–55 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Yang JH (2017) Adaptive Strategies of Clonal Plants Growing in Heterogeneous Environments. PhD dissertation, Nanjing University, Nanjing (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Yoon TH, Kang HE, Kang CK, Lee SH, Ahn DH, Park H, Kim HW (2016) Development of a cost-effective metabarcoding strategy for analysis of the marine phytoplankton community. Peer J, 4, e2.

    Zaiko A, Martinez JL, Schmidtpetersen J (2015a) Metabarcoding approach for the ballast water surveillance—An advantageous solution or an awkward challenge? Marine Pollution Bulletin, 92, 25–34.

    Zaiko A, Samuiloviene A, Ardura A, Garcia-Vazquez E (2015b) Metabarcoding approach for nonindigenous species surveillance in marine coastal waters. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 100, 53–59.

    Zhan A, Hulák M, Sylvester F, Huang X, Adebayo AA, Abbott CL, Adamowicz SJ, Heath DD, Cristescu ME, Maclsaac HJ (2013) High sensitivity of 454 Pyrosequencing for detection of rare species in aquatic communities. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4, 558–565.

    Zhan A, Bailey SA, Heath DD, Maclsaac HJ (2014a) Performance comparison of genetic markers for high-throughput sequencing-based biodiversity assessment in complex communities. Molecular Ecology Resources, 14, 1049–1059.

    Zhan A, Xiong W, He S, Maclsaac HJ (2014b) Influence of artifact removal on rare species recovery in natural complex communities using high-throughput sequencing. PLoS ONE, 9, e96928.

    Zhan A, He EA, Brown FJJ, Chain TW, Therriault CL, Abbott DD, Heath ME, Maclsaac Cristescu HJ (2014c) Reproducibility of Pyrosequencing data for biodiversity assessment in complex communities. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 5, 881–890.

    Zhan A, Maclsaac HJ (2015) Rare biosphere exploration using high-throughput sequencing: Research progress and perspectives. Conservation Genetics, 16, 513–522.

    Zhan A, Ni P, Xiong W, Chen Y, Lin Y, Huang X (2017) Biological invasions in aquatic ecosystems in China. Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management, 10, 402–412.

    Zhou J, Wu L, Deng Y, Zhi X, Jiang Y, Tu Q, Xie J, Van Nostrand JD, He Z, Yang Y (2011) Reproducibility and quantitation of amplicon sequencing-based detection. The ISME Journal, 5, 1303–1313.

    Zhou X, Li Y, Liu S, Yang Q, Su X, Zhou L, Tang M, Fu R, Li J, Huang Q (2013) Ultradeep sequencing enables highfidelity recovery of biodiversity for bulk arthropod samples without PCR amplification. GigaScience, 2 (1), 4.

This Article


CN: 11-3247/Q

Vol 27, No. 05, Pages 491-504

May 2019


Article Outline


  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 eDNA-metabarcoding technology
  • 3 Application of eDNA-metabarcoding technology in early monitoring and warning of aquatic invasive species
  • 4 Problems and optimization schemes of eDNA-metabarcoding technology
  • 5 Prospects
  • Footnote