土地流转农户生计转型中生计资本整合特征及效益

张仕超1,2 郑栋升1 蒋佳佳1

(1.重庆师范大学地理与旅游学院, 重庆 401331)
(2.三峡库区地表过程与环境遥感重点实验室, 重庆 401331)

【摘要】为了揭示土地流转下异质性农户的生计资本整合特征, 该文基于267户流转农户调查数据, 将农户划分为稳定型纯农户、非农化纯农户、稳定型兼业户、非农化兼业户和稳定型弃农户, 在此基础上, 分析了异质性农户生计资本差异, 并采用雷达图、生计资本扰动指数与生计资本增长指数, 剖析了异质性农户生计资本整合的方向、强度及效益。结果表明:1) 土地流转前, 非农化纯农户和非农化兼业户在人力资本、生活资本、金融资本和社会资本上占优势, 稳定型纯农户和稳定型兼业户在自然资本和生产资本上占优势;2) 土地流转后, 非农化纯农户和非农化兼业户侧重整合人力资本、金融资本和社会资本, 而稳定型纯农户和稳定型兼业户侧重整合生产资本, 稳定型弃农户整合方向不明显。3) 生计资本扰动指数非农化纯农户 (0.169) >非农化兼业户 (0.144) >稳定型纯农户 (0.124) >稳定型兼业户 (0.105) >稳定型弃农户 (0.098) , 生计资本整合强度非农化农户高于稳定型农户;4) 生计资本增长指数非农化兼业户 (0.135) >非农化纯农户 (0.120) >稳定型兼业户 (0.094) >稳定型弃农户 (0.093) >稳定型纯农户 (0.088) , 生计资本整合效益非农化农户亦显著优于稳定型农户。研究结果将有助于加深对农户生计资本整合与土地流转互动机制的认识, 以期为促进土地顺畅流转实现“失地/得地”农户的生计可持续化政策制定提供参考。

【关键词】 土地利用; 农村; 土地流转; 农户生计; 生计资本; 生计转型;

【DOI】

【基金资助】 国家自然科学基金资助项目 (41501104) 重庆市科委基础与前沿研究计划项目 (cstc2015jcyjA80025, cstc2016jcyjA0393)

Download this article

    References

    [1]Chen Jia, Zhang Liqiong, Yang Xinjun, et al.The impact of tourism development on changes of households'livelihood and community tourism effect:A case study based on the perspective of tourism development mode[J].Geographical Research, 2017, 36 (9) :1709-1724. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [2]Wu Kongsen, Yang Xinjun, Yin Sha.Farmers'Livelihood choice and sustainability under the influence of environmental change:A case study of Minqin Oasis community in Gansu Province[J].Economical Geography, 2016, 36 (9) :141-149. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [3]Alam, G M.Livelihood Cycle and Vulnerability of rural households to climate change and hazards in Bangladesh[J].Environmental Management, 2017, 59 (5) :777-791.

    [4]Castells-Quintana D, Lopez-Uribe M D, McDermott T K J.Adaptation to climate change:A review through a development economics lens[J].World Development, 2018, 104:183-196.

    [5]Li Cong, Liu Wei, Feng Weilin, et al.The influence of relocation policy on rural households'livelihood strategy:Based on the household survey data in South Shaanxi Province[J].China Rural Survey, 2013 (6) :31-44, 93. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [6]Ping Xiaoge, Li Chunwang, Jiang Zhigang.Household energy consumption patterns in agricultural zone, pastoral zone and agro-pastoral transitional zone in eastern part of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J].Biomass and Bioenergy, 2013, 58:1-9.

    [7]Dao Rena.Relationship between livelihood assets and livelihood strategies of rural households of farming-pastoral area:A case study on four counties in the Eastern Inner Mongolia[J].China Population, Resources and Environment, 2014, 24 (S2) :274-278. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [8]Hua Xiaobo, Yan Jianzhon, Zhang Yili.Evaluating the role of livelihood assets in suitable livelihood strategies:Protocol for anti-poverty policy in the Eastern Tibetan Plateau, China[J].Ecological Indicators, 2017, 78, 62-74.

    [9]Yan Janzhong, Wu Yingying, Zhang Yili.Livelihood diversification of peasants and nomads of eastern transect in Tibetan Plateau[J].Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2010, 20 (5) :757-770.

    [10]Wang Yanxing, Pan Shiyu, Lu Tao, et al.Impact of livelihood capital on the livelihood activities of herdsmen on the eastern edge of Qinghai-Tibet plateau[J].Resources Science, 2014, 36 (10) :2157-2165. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [11]Cai Jin, Yu Yanggchun, Zhu Lifen, et al.Research on Farmers’livelihoods changes under the new rural community construction taking Tyanzi Village of Zhongxian County, Chong Qing City as an example[J].Areal Research and Development, 2015, 34 (4) :143-147, 153. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [12]Zhong Jianbing, Shao Jing'an, Yang Yuzhu.Characteristics of non-point source pollution load of crop farming undergoing the background of livelihood diversification[J].Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71 (7) :1201-1214. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [13]Bhandari B P.Rural livelihood change?Household capital, community resources and livelihood transition[J].Journal of Rural Studies.2013, 32:126-136.

    [14]Zena W S.Getting stuck, falling behind or moving forward:Rural livelihood movements and persistence in Nepal[J].Land Use Policy, 2017, 65:294-207.

    [15]Gentle P, Maraseni T.Climate change, poverty and livelihoods:Adaptation practices by rural mountain communities in Nepal[J].Environmental Science&Policy, 2012, 21:24-34.

    [16]Jagger P, Luckert M K, Bahati J, et al.Asking questions to understand rural livelihoods:comparing disaggregated vs.aggregated approaches to household livelihood questionnaires[J].World Development, 2012, 40 (9) :1810-1823.

    [17]Sarah J C, Tim W.Rural household vulnerability to climate risk in Uganda[J].Regional Environmental Change, 2017, 17 (3) :649-663.

    [18]Pamela J, Gerald S, Arthur A.Circular migration, small-scale logging, and household livelihoods in Uganda[J].Population and Environment, 2012, 34 (21) :235-256.

    [19]Kebebe E, Shibru F.Impact of alternative livelihood interventions on household welfare:Evidence from rural Ethiopia[J].Forest Policy and Economics, 2017, 75:67-72.

    [20]Tesfaye Y, Roos A, Campbell B M.Livelihood strategies and the role of forest income in participatory-managed forests of Dodola area in the bale highlands, southern Ethiopia[J].Forest Policy and Economics, 2011, 13 (4) :258-265.

    [21]Zhao Xueyan, Zhang Li, Jiang Jinde, et al.The impact of ecological compensation on the farmers'livelihood:A case study of Huanghe River water supply areas of Gannan[J].Geographical Research, 2013, 32 (3) :531-542. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [22]Keshavarza M, Maleksaeidib H, Karamic E.Livelihood vulnerability to drought:A case of rural Iran[J].International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2017, 21:223-230.

    [23]Zhang Zhongming, Qian Wenrong.Study on Farmers’willingness of land transfer under different levels of concurrent business:Based on the investigation and evidence in Zhejiang Province[J].Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2014, 35 (3) :19-24, 110. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [24]Zhong Xiaolan, Li Jiangtao, Feng Yanfen, et al.Farmland transfer willingness and behavior in the perspective of farm housed cognition in Guandong Province[J].Resources Science, 2013, 35 (10) :2082-2093. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [25]Ji Honglei, Cai Yinying.Households’land transfer behavior:a case study of 516 respondents in Wuhan suburb[J].Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2017, 26 (2) :220-226. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [26]Yan Jianzhong, Zhuo Rengui, Xie Deti, et al.Land use characters of farmers of different livelihood strategies:Cases in Three gorges reservoir area[J].Acta Geographica Sinica, 2010, 65 (11) :1401-1410. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [27]Wang Cheng, Wang Liping, Li Xiaoqing, et al.The source of forward-security of farmers’livelihood and settlement integration:Based on the survey of 477 farmers in Bailin Village west suburbs of Chongqing[J].Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011, 66 (8) :1141-1152. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [28]Zhang Lie, Wang Cheng, Du Xiangzuo, et al.Multifunction compartmentalization of rural settlement land use and its peasant household utilization difference evaluation[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of CSAE) , 2017, 33 (12) :278-285. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [29]Zhao Xueyan.Sustainable livelihoods research from the perspective of geography:The present status, questions and priority areas[J].Geographical Research, 2017, 36 (10) :1859-1872. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [30]Tang Qing.Research progress and future key trends of sustainable livelihoods[J].Advances in Earth science, 2015, 30 (7) :823-833. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [31]Li Shuai, Wei Hong, Ni Xilu.Evaluation of urban human settlement quality in Ningxia based on AHP and the entropy method[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2014, 25 (9) :2700-2708. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [32]Xin Guixin, Yang Chaoxian, Yang Qingyuan, et al.Post-evaluation of well-facilitated capital farmland construction based on entropy weight method and improved TOPSIS model[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2017, 33 (1) :238-249. (in Chinese with English abstract)

This Article

ISSN:1002-6819

CN: 11-2047/S

Vol 34, No. 12, Pages 274-281

June 2018

Downloads:0

Share
Article Outline

摘要

  • 0 引言
  • 1 数据来源
  • 2 研究方法
  • 3 结果与分析
  • 4 结论
  • 参考文献